References
- 1Bayer, M., & Schacht, A. (2014). Event-related brain responses to emotional words, pictures, and faces–a cross-domain comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1106. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01106
- 2Beall, P. M., & Herbert, A. M. (2008). The face wins: Stronger automatic processing of affect in facial expressions than words in a modified Stroop task. Cognition and Emotion, 22(8), 1613–1642. 10.1080/02699930801940370
- 3Bruno, N. M., Embon, I., Rivera, M. N. D., Giménez, L., D’Amelio, T. A., Batán, S. T., … & Andreau, J. M. (2020). Faster might not be better: Pictures may not elicit a stronger unconscious priming effect than words when modulated by semantic similarity. Consciousness and Cognition, 81, 102932. 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102932
- 4Coll, S. Y., Glauser, A., & Grandjean, D. (2019). Timing is crucial for the integration of angry facial expressions with motor responses: Investigation of subliminal and supraliminal emotion–action bindings. Emotion, 19(3), 543–557. 10.1037/emo0000457
- 5Coll, S. Y., & Grandjean, D. (2016). Visuomotor integration of relevant and irrelevant angry and fearful facial expressions. Acta Psychologica, 170, 226–238. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.001
- 6Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2011). The Geneva affective picture database (GAPED): a new 730-picture database focusing on valence and normative significance. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 468–477. 10.3758/s13428-011-0064-1
- 7De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D. (1994). Differences in the affective processing of words and pictures. Cognition & Emotion, 8(1), 1–20. 10.1080/02699939408408925
- 8De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2002). Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16(5), 643–666. 10.1080/02699930143000419
- 9De Houwer, J., & Randell, T. (2002). Attention to primes modulates affective priming of pronunciation responses. Experimental Psychology, 49(3), 163–170. 10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.163
- 10Doallo, S., Holguín, S. R., & Cadaveira, F. (2006). Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 17(17), 1797–1801. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000246325.51191.39
- 11Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–239. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
- 12Feng, C., Gu, R., Li, T., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Luo, W., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2021). Separate neural networks of implicit emotional processing between pictures and words: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 331–344. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.041
- 13Fischer, R., & Schubert, T. (2008). Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 55(3), 203–211. 10.1027/1618-3169.55.3.203
- 14Flaisch, T., Imhof, M., Schmälzle, R., Wentz, K. U., Ibach, B., & Schupp, H. T. (2015). Implicit and explicit attention to pictures and words: An fMRI-study of concurrent emotional stimulus processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 136573. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01861
- 15Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., … & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- 16Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. 10.1080/17470210600955645
- 17Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 555–562. 10.1038/nn1224
- 18Gupta, R., Hur, Y. J., & Lavie, N. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16(3), 328–337. 10.1037/emo0000112
- 19Hartikainen, K. M., Ogawa, K. H., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Transient interference of right hemispheric function due to automatic emotional processing. Neuropsychologia, 38(12), 1576–1580. 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00072-5
- 20Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus–response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- 21Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8(6), 515–533. 10.1080/02699939408408957
- 22Hinojosa, J. A., Carretié, L., Valcárcel, M. A., Méndez-Bértolo, C., & Pozo, M. A. (2009). Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(2), 173–189. 10.3758/CABN.9.2.173
- 23Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. 10.1080/713756773
- 24Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- 25Kanwisher, N., Stanley, D., & Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. Neuroreport, 10(1), 183–187. 10.1097/00001756-199901180-00035
- 26Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 110–126. 10.3758/CABN.6.2.110
- 27Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing—An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 75–83. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.004
- 28Kunde, W., Augst, S., & Kleinsorge, T. (2012). Adaptation to (non) valent task disturbance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 644–660. 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8
- 29Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1(39–58), 3.
- 30Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Ez: Easy Analysis and Visualisation of Factorial Experiments. R Package Version 4.4.0.
- 31Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- 32Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 959–978. 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
- 33Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2005). Unintentional processing of motivational valence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 1043–1063. 10.1080/02724980443000467
- 34Oriet, C., Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2005). Symbolic distance affects two processing loci in the number comparison task. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 913–926. 10.3758/BF03193085
- 35Pecchinenda, A., & Heil, M. (2007). Role of working memory load on selective attention to affectively valent information. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 898–909. 10.1080/09541440601095388
- 36Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002a). Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 31–45. 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8
- 37Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002b). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(17), 11458–11463. 10.1073/pnas.172403899
- 38R Core Team. (2023).
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. - 39Rellecke, J., Palazova, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). On the automaticity of emotion processing in words and faces: event-related brain potentials evidence from a superficial task. Brain and Cognition, 77(1), 23–32. 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.001
- 40Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Emotions in word and face processing: early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69(3), 538–550. 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.11.005
- 41Schöpper, L. M., & Frings, C. (2022). Inhibition of return (IOR) meets stimulus-response (SR) binding: Manually responding to central arrow targets is driven by SR binding, not IOR. Visual Cognition, 30(10), 641–658. 10.1080/13506285.2023.2169802
- 42Schöpper, L. M., Hilchey, M. D., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2020). Detection versus discrimination: The limits of binding accounts in action control. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2085–2097. 10.3758/s13414-019-01911-4
- 43Schöpper, L. M., Jerusalem, A., Lötzke, L., & Frings, C. (2023). Bound to a spider without its web: Task-type modulates the retrieval of affective information in subsequent responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 85(8), 2655–2672. 10.3758/s13414-023-02791-5
- 44Schöpper, L. M., Küpper, V., & Frings, C. (2023). Attentional biases toward spiders do not modulate retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 135–144. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000584
- 45Schöpper, L. M., Lappe, M., & Frings, C. (2022). Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(7), 2219–2235. 10.3758/s13414-022-02538-8
- 46Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31–51. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9
- 47Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2018). The influence of visual noise in the binding of irrelevant features to responses. Visual Cognition, 26(10), 780–791. 10.1080/13506285.2018.1553812
- 48Singh, T., Moeller, B., Koch, I., & Frings, C. (2018). May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1143–1156. 10.3758/s13414-018-1498-7
- 49Singh, T., & Schubert, T. (2021). The Influence of Cognitive Load on Distractor-Response Bindings. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696353. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696353
- 50Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D. (2009). Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1), 37–54. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
- 51Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (2002). On the nature of the affective priming effect: Affective priming of naming responses. Social cognition, 20(3), 227–256. 10.1521/soco.20.3.227.21106
- 52Sutton, T. M., & Lutz, C. (2019). Attentional capture for emotional words and images: The importance of valence and arousal. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 73(1), 47–54. 10.1037/cep0000154
- 53Treisman, A. (1999). Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence. Neuron, 24(1), 105–125. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80826-0
- 54Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 131–160). Reading, MA: Addison-wesley.
- 55Wiens, S., & Syrjänen, E. (2013). Directed attention reduces processing of emotional distracters irrespective of valence and arousal level. Biological Psychology, 94(1), 44–54. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.05.001
- 56Williams, J. A. (1966). Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: implications for decision models. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 665. 10.1037/h0023101