Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unconscious Processing Contaminates Objective Measures of Conscious Perception: Evidence From the Liminal Prime Paradigm Cover

Unconscious Processing Contaminates Objective Measures of Conscious Perception: Evidence From the Liminal Prime Paradigm

Open Access
|Oct 2024

Figures & Tables

joc-7-1-402-g1.png
Figure 1

Sequence of events on each trial. On target-categorization trials participants first determined whether the target word represented an animal smaller or larger than a shoebox. Then, they rated the prime’s visibility on a 4-level scale. Prime-categorization trials were similar, except that participants categorized the prime instead of the target animal name. Stimuli are not drawn to scale.

joc-7-1-402-g2.png
Figure 2

Mean response priming on RTs (in milliseconds) as a function of prime’s visibility rating and response speed (50% fastest vs. 50% slowest). Error bars indicate standard errors.

Table 1

Distribution of the prime-visibility ratings for each trial type.

0-VISIBILITY1-VISIBILITY2-VISIBILITY3-VISIBILITY
Target-Categorization trials46%14%12%28%
Prime-Categorization trials34%16%13%37%
Catch trials85%8%3%4%
Table 2

Estimated marginal mean RTs (in milliseconds) and mean accuracy (in percentage) on target-categorization trials, as a function of response congruence (congruent and incongruent), prime visibility (0, 1, 2, and 3) and response speed (50% fastest and 50% slowest). Standard errors are presented in parentheses.

FAST RTs (ms)SLOW RTs (ms)ACCURACY (%)
3-visibility
    Incongruent571 (7.32)751 (12.0)86.9 (1.25)
    Congruent543 (6.93)721 (11.6)93.2 (0.92)
    Response priming28***27***6.3***
2-visibility
    Incongruent564 (8.14)720 (12.3)92.9 (1.07)
    Congruent546 (8.36)697 (13.1)96.2 (0.88)
    Response priming18**23*3.3**
1-visibility
    Incongruent544 (5.55)698 (10.5)93.8 (0.99)
    Congruent547 (7.21)698 (12.1)94.3 (1.18)
    Response priming–300.5
0-visibility
    Incongruent524 (6.55)667 (10.1)89.3 (1.05)
    Congruent514 (8.34)669 (10.6)89.6 (0.89)
    Response priming10**–20.3

[i] *= p < .05, **= p < .01, ***= p < .001.

joc-7-1-402-g3.png
Figure 3

Mean accuracy (in percentage) on prime-categorization trials as a function of prime-visibility ratings. Error bars indicate standard errors.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.402 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2024
|
Accepted on: Sep 18, 2024
|
Published on: Oct 1, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Nitzan Micher, Diana Mazenko, Dominique Lamy, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.