The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions

Markus Kiefer; Thomas Kammer

doi:10.5334/joc.381

Abstract

Within the realm of consciousness research, different methods of measuring the content of visual awareness are used: On the one hand, subjective measures require a report of sensory experiences related to a stimulus. On the other hand, objective measures rely on the observer’s performance to accurately detect or discriminate the stimulus. The most appropriate measure of awareness is currently debated. To contribute to this debate, we review findings on the relation between subjective and objective measures of awareness. Although subjective measures sometimes lag behind objective measures, a substantial number of studies demonstrates a convergence of measures. Based on the reviewed studies, we identify five aspects relevant for achieving a convergence of measures. Future research could then identify and empirically test the boundary conditions, under which a convergence or divergence of subjective and measures of awareness is observed.

References

Albrecht, T., & Mattler, U. (2012). Individual differences in subjective experience and objective performance in metacontrast masking. Journal of Vision, 12(5). DOI: 10.1167/12.5.5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Asplund, C. L., Fougnie, D., Zughni, S., Martin, J. W., & Marois, R. (2014). The attentional blink reveals the probabilistic nature of discrete conscious perception. Psychological Science, 25(3), 824–831. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613513810
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–287. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00038188
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, N. (2011). Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(12), 567–575. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Block, N. (2014). Rich conscious perception outside focal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 445–447. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Öğmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198530671.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Graaf, T. A., Goebel, R., & Sack, A. T. (2012). Feedforward and quick recurrent processes in early visual cortex revealed by TMS? Neuroimage, 61(3), 651–659. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Del Cul, A., Dehaene, S., Reyes, P., Bravo, E., & Slachevsky, A. (2009). Causal role of prefrontal cortex in the threshold for access to consciousness. Brain, 132, 2531–2540. DOI: 10.1093/Brain/Awp111
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Di Gregorio, F., Trajkovic, J., Roperti, C., Marcantoni, E., Di Luzio, P., Avenanti, A., … Romei, V. (2022). Tuning alpha rhythms to shape conscious visual perception. Current Biology, 32(5), 988–99. e986. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Di Luzio, P., Tarasi, L., Silvanto, J., Avenanti, A., & Romei, V. (2022). Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks. PLoS Biology, 20(8), e3001750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001750
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness – a methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review, 67(5), 279–300. DOI: 10.1037/H0041622
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garric, C., Sebaa, A., Caetta, F., Perez, C., Sauatovsky, J., Sergent, C., & Chokron, S. (2019). Dissociation between objective and subjective perceptual experiences in a population of hemianopic patients: A new form of blindsight? Cortex, 117, 299–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jimenez, M., Hinojosa, J. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2020). Visual awareness and the levels of processing hypothesis: A critical review. Consciousness and Cognition, 85. DOI: 10.1016/J.Concog.2020.103022
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jimenez, M., Prieto, A., Gómez, P., Hinojosa, J. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2023). Masked priming under the Bayesian microscope: Exploring the integration of local elements into global shape through Bayesian model comparison. Consciousness and Cognition, 115, 103568. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103568
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jimenez, M., Prieto, A., Hinojosa, J. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2024). Consciousness under the spotlight: The problem of measuring subjective experience. Unpublished preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/r4nz3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jimenez, M., Villalba-Garcia, C., Luna, D., Hinojosa, J. A., & Montoro, P. R. (2019). The nature of visual awareness at stimulus energy and feature levels: A backward masking study. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 81(6), 1926–1943. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01732-5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70(6, Pt.1), 404–425. DOI: 10.1037/h0026731
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., Ansorge, U., Haynes, J. D., Hamker, F., Mattler, U., Verleger, R., & Niedeggen, M. (2011). Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of conscious and unconscious visual perception: From a plethora of phenomena to general principles. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 55–67. DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0090-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., Fruehauf, V., & Kammer, T. (2023a). Subjective and objective measures of visual awareness converge. Plos One, 18(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292438
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., Harpaintner, M., Rohr, M., & Wentura, D. (2023b). Assessing subjective prime awareness on a trial-by-trial basis interferes with masked semantic priming effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(2), 269–283. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001228
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiefer, M., & Kammer, T. (2017). The emergence of visual awareness: Temporal dynamics in relation to task and mask type. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 315. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00315
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kingdom, F. A., & Prins, N. (2016). Psychophysics. A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407156-8.00001-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koch, C., & Preuschoff, K. (2007). Betting the house on consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 10(2), 140–141. DOI: 10.1038/Nn0207-140
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koivisto, M., & Neuvonen, S. (2020). Masked blindsight in normal observers: Measuring subjective and objective responses to two features of each stimulus. Consciousness and Cognition, 81, 102929. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102929
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koster, N., Mattler, U., & Albrecht, T. (2020). Visual experience forms a multidimensional pattern that is not reducible to a single measure: Evidence from metacontrast masking. Journal of Vision, 20(3). DOI: 10.1167/jovi.20.3.2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lähteenmäki, M., Hyönä, J., Koivisto, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2015). Affective processing requires awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 339–365. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000040
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lamy, D., Alon, L., Carmel, T., & Shalev, N. (2015). The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating. Psychological Science, 26(1), 48–57. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614556777
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lamy, D., Carmel, T., & Peremen, Z. (2017). Prior conscious experience enhances conscious perception but does not affect response priming. Cognition, 160, 62–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, Q., Hill, Z., & He, B. J. (2014). Spatiotemporal dissociation of brain activity underlying subjective awareness, objective performance and confidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(12), 4382–4395. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1820-13.2014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martens, U., Ansorge, U., & Kiefer, M. (2011). Controlling the unconscious: Attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuo-motor processes differentially. Psychological Science, 22(2), 282–291. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610397056
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mashour, G. A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J. P., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious processing and the global neuronal workspace hypothesis. Neuron, 105(5), 776–798. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mazor, M., Dijkstra, N., & Fleming, S. M. (2022). Dissociating the neural correlates of subjective visibility from those of decision confidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(12), 2562–2569. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1220-21.2022
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review/LXXXIII, 4, 435–450. DOI: 10.2307/2183914
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Noy, N., Bickel, S., Zion-Golumbic, E., Harel, M., Golan, T., Davidesco, I., … Malach, R. (2015). Ignition’s glow: Ultra-fast spread of global cortical activity accompanying local “ignitions” in visual cortex during conscious visual perception. Consciousnes and Cognition, 35, 206–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Overgaard, M. (2018). Phenomenal consciousness and cognitive access. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 373(1755). DOI: 10.1098/Rstb.2017.0353
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Overgaard, M., & Mogensen, J. (2016). An integrative view on consciousness and introspection. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 8, 129–141. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-016-0303-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Overgaard, M., Rote, J., Mouridsen, K., & Ramsoy, T. Z. (2006). Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(4), 700–708. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Overgaard, M., & Sandberg, K. (2021). The Perceptual Awareness Scale – recent controversies and debates. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 7(1). DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab044
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Persuh, M. (2018). Measuring perceptual consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02320
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, M. A. K., & Lau, H. (2015). Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli. Elife, 4. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09651
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pincham, H. L., Bowman, H., & Szucs, D. (2016). The experiential blink: Mapping the cost of working memory encoding onto conscious perception in the attentional blink. Cortex, 81, 35–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pöppel, E., Held, R., & Frost, D. (1973). Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature, 243(5405), 295–296. DOI: 10.1038/243295a0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pournaghdali, A., Schwartz, B. L., Hays, J., & Soto, F. A. (2023). Sensitivity vs. awareness curve: A novel model-based analysis to uncover the processes underlying nonconscious perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 553–563. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02180-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramsøy, T. Z., & Overgaard, M. (2004). Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 1–23. DOI: 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rausch, M., Muller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2015). Metacognitive sensitivity of subjective reports of decisional confidence and visual experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 192–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rausch, M., & Zehetleitner, M. (2016). Visibility is not equivalent to confidence in a low contrast orientation discrimination task. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2016.00591
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.3.849
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see – the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sahraie, A., Trevethan, C. T., MacLeod, M. J., Murray, A. D., Olson, J. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (2006). Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103(40), 14971–14976. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0607073103
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sandberg, K., Bibby, B. M., Timmermans, B., Cleeremans, A., & Overgaard, M. (2011). Measuring consciousness: Task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1659–1675. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sandberg, K., Timmermans, B., Overgaard, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other? Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1069–1078. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt, T. (2015). Invisible stimuli, implicit tresholds: Why invisibility judgments cannot be interpreted in isolation. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 31–41. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0169-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt, T., & Biafora, M. (2024). A theory of visibility measures in the dissociation paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(1), 65–88. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02332-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: Three types of dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(3), 489–504. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193692
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sergent, C., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 5(11), 720–728. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00748.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seth, A. K. (2008). Post-decision wagering measures metacognitive content, not sensory consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 981–983. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: Relating behavioural and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 314–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Snodgrass, M., & Shevrin, H. (2006). Unconscious inhibition and facilitation at the objective detection threshold: Replicable and qualitatively different unconscious perceptual effects. Cognition, 101(1), 43–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.06.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Song, C., & Yao, H. (2016). Unconscious processing of invisible visual stimuli. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 38917. DOI: 10.1038/srep38917
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(11), 1–29. DOI: 10.1037/h0093759
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szczepanowski, R., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Fear perception: Can objective and subjective awareness measures be dissociated? Journal of Vision, 7(4). DOI: 10.1167/7.4.10
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Trajkovic, J., Di Gregorio, F., Avenanti, A., Thut, G., & Romei, V. (2023). Two Oscillatory Correlates of Attention Control in the Alpha-Band with Distinct Consequences on Perceptual Gain and Metacognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 43(19), 3548–3556. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1827-22.2023
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100(10), 6275–6280. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0931489100
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weiskrantz, L. (1997). Consciousness lost and found. A neuropsychological exploration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8), 1293–1313. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194544
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wierzchoń, M., Anzulewicz, A., Hobot, J., Paulewicz, B., & Sackur, J. (2019). In search of the optimal measure of awareness: Discrete or continuous? Consciousness and Cognition, 75. DOI: 10.1016/J.Concog.2019.102798
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Windey, B., & Cleeremans, A. (2015). Consciousness as a graded and an all-or-none phenomenon: A conceptual analysis. Consciousness and cognition, 35, 185–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Windey, B., Gevers, W., & Cleeremans, A. (2013). Subjective visibility depends on level of processing. Cognition, 129(2), 404–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zehetleitner, M., & Rausch, M. (2013). Being confident without seeing: What subjective measures of visual consciousness are about. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1406–1426. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0505-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions

Abstract

Paradigm

My account