References
- 1Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- 2Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2020). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6–40. DOI: 10.1177/0265532220927487
- 3Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- 4Baddeley, A., Emslie, H., & Smith, I. N. (1992).
The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing test . Thames Valley Test Company. - 5Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- 6Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 7Baylor, C., Hula, W., Donovan, N. J., Doyle, P. J., Kendall, D., & Yorkston, K. (2011). An Introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Models for Speech-Language Pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(3), 243–259. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0079)
- 8Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M., & Wilks, A. R. (1988). The New S Language. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
- 9Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 27(1), 101–118. DOI: 10.1177/0265532209340194
- 10Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498
- 11Blott, L. M., Gowenlock, A. E., Kievit, R., Nation, K., & Rodd, J. M. (2023). Studying Individual Differences in Language Comprehension: The Challenges of Item-Level Variability and Well-Matched Control Conditions. Journal of Cognition. DOI: 10.5334/joc.317
- 12Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test (Forms G and H). Chicago, IL: Riverside.
- 13Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
- 14Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555
- 15de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
- 16Drown, L., Giovannone, N., Pisoni, D. B., & Theodore, R. M. (2023a). Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: brief assessments. Linguistics Vanguard, 9(1), 99–111. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2022-0116
- 17Drown, L., Giovannone, N., Pisoni, D. B., & Theodore, R. M. (2023b). Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: long-form assessments. Linguistics Vanguard, 9(1), 113–124. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2022-0115
- 18Dunn, D. M. (2019). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fifth Edition (PPVT-5). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
- 19Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. DOI: 10.1037/t15145-000
- 20Edwards, M. C. (2009). An Introduction to Item Response Theory Using the Need for Cognition Scale. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 507–529. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00194.x
- 21George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429056765
- 22Gyllstad, H., Vilkaitė, L., & Schmitt, N. (2015). Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: Issues with guessing and sampling rates. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(2), 278–306. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00617
- 23Harel, D., Goudelias, D., Cheng, H.-S., Baese-Berk, M. M., Theodore, R. M., & Levi, S. V. (2024). Examining the Relationship Between Multiple Tests of Receptive Vocabulary. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67(2), 595–605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26569-0
- 24Hoffman, P. (2018). An individual differences approach to semantic cognition: Divergent effects of age on representation, retrieval and selection. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8145. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26569-0
- 25Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665–1692. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560
- 26Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. DOI: 10.1007/BF02288391
- 27Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
- 28Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878. Retrieved from
https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt162.pdf - 29Liu, H., & Chaouch-Orozco, A. (2024). Evaluation of the Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a quick and practical proxy for language proficiency. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI: 10.1075/lab.23066.liu
- 30Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- 31Meara, P., & Buxton, B. (1987). An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4(2), 142–154. DOI: 10.1177/026553228700400202
- 32Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I. (2016). Tools for Researching Vocabulary. Bristol: Channel View Publications. DOI: 10.21832/9781783096473
- 33Miller, L. J., Myers, A., Prinzi, L., & Mittenberg, W. (2009). Changes in Intellectual Functioning Associated with Normal Aging. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 681–688. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp072
- 34Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
- 35Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 3. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7
- 36Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299–320. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299
- 37Parks, R., Ray, J., & Bland, S. (1998).
Wordsmyth English Dictionary-Thesaurus . [Electronic version]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.http://www.wordsmyth.net - 38Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., … Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- 39Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. DOI: 10.1080/10888430701530730
- 40Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002).
The lexical quality hypothesis . In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213): John Benjamin. DOI: 10.1075/swll.11.14per - 41Puig-Mayenco, E., Chaouch-Orozco, A., Liu, H., & Martín-Villena, F. (2023). The LexTALE as a measure of L2 global proficiency: A cautionary tale based on a partial replication of Lemhöfer and Broersma (2012). Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13(3), 299–314. DOI: 10.1075/lab.22048.pui
- 42R Core Team. (2020).
R: A language and environment for statistical computing . R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.https://www.R-project.org/ - 43Raven, J. C., Raven, J. E., & Court, J. H. (1989).
Mill Hill vocabulary scale . Psychological Corporation. - 44Rodd, J. M. (2024). Moving experimental psychology online: How to obtain high quality data when we can’t see our participants. Journal of Memory and Language, 134, 104472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2023.104472
- 45Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
- 46Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
- 47Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88. DOI: 10.1177/026553220101800103
- 48Shipley, W. C. (1940). A Self-Administering Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment and Deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 371–377. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1940.9917704
- 49Shipley, W. C., Gruber, C. P., Martin, T. A., & Klein, A. M. (2009). Shipley-2 manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. DOI: 10.1037/t48948-000
- 50Signorell, A. (2021). DescTools: Tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.44.
https://andrisignorell.github.io/DescTools/ . - 51Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(1), 181–203. DOI: 10.1017/S027226312000025X
- 52Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64–81. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64
- 53van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
- 54Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332–339. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332
- 55Vermeiren, H., Vandendaele, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2023). Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 55(3), 1036–1068. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01856-x
- 56Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fifth Edition (CELF-5). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
- 57Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370. Retrieved from
https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm - 58Yeatman, J. D., Tang, K. A., Donnelly, P. M., Yablonski, M., Ramamurthy, M., Karipidis, I. I., … Domingue, B. W. (2021). Rapid online assessment of reading ability. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6396. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85907-x