Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evidence Against Effects of Cultural Group and Prior Knowledge on Feature Binding in Working Memory Cover

Evidence Against Effects of Cultural Group and Prior Knowledge on Feature Binding in Working Memory

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. 1Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135(2), 298313. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.298
  2. 2Asch, S. E., Ceraso, J., & Heimer, W. (1960). Perceptual conditions of association. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(3), 148. DOI: 10.1037/h0093755
  3. 3Bartsch, L. M., Loaiza, V. M., & Oberauer, K. (2019). Does limited working memory capacity underlie age differences in associative long-term memory? Psychology and Aging, 34(2), 268281. psyh. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000317
  4. 4Bartsch, L. M., & Shepherdson, P. (2020). Freeing capacity in WM through the use of LTM representations. https://psyarxiv.com/hj4rv/. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/hj4rv
  5. 5Ceraso, J. (1985). Unit Formation in Perception and Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 179210). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60527-7
  6. 6Ceraso, J. (1990). Perceptual organization affects both the learning and integration of object properties. In The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 113125). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  7. 7Cowan, N. (1999). An Embedded-Processes Model of Working Memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 62101). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
  8. 8Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 1262912633. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102
  9. 9Ecker, U. K. H., Maybery, M., & Zimmer, H. D. (2013). Binding of intrinsic and extrinsic features in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(1), 218234. DOI: 10.1037/a0028732
  10. 10Ecker, U. K. H., Zimmer, H. D., & Groh-Bordin, C. (2007a). Color and context: An ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 14831501. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193618
  11. 11Ecker, U. K. H., Zimmer, H. D., & Groh-Bordin, C. (2007b). The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Research, 1185, 221230. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.047
  12. 12Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Higher Education from Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/data-analysis-using-regression-and-multilevel-hierarchical-models/32A29531C7FD730C3A68951A17C9D983. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511790942
  13. 13Groh-Bordin, C., Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2006). Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. NeuroImage, 32(4), 18791890. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.215
  14. 14Heck, D. W., Arnold, N. R., & Arnold, D. (2018). TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0869-7
  15. 15Johns, E. E., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2002). What information underlies correct rejections in short-term recognition memory? Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 4659. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195264
  16. 16Klauer, K. C. (2010). Hierarchical Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Latent-Trait Approach. Psychometrika, 75(1), 7098. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-009-9141-0
  17. 17Li, A. Y., Liang, J. C., Lee, A. C. H., & Barense, M. D. (2020). The validated circular shape space: Quantifying the visual similarity of shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(5), 949966. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000693
  18. 18Loaiza, V. M., & Srokova, S. (2020). Semantic Relatedness Corrects the Age-Related Binding Deficit in Working Memory and Episodic Memory. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(9), 18411849. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz055
  19. 19Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), Article 6657. DOI: 10.1038/36846
  20. 20Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922934. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922
  21. 21Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Batchelder, W. H., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). Bayesian Estimation of Multinomial Processing Tree Models with Heterogeneity in Participants and Items. Psychometrika, 80(1), 205235. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9374-9
  22. 22Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467473. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004
  23. 23Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291310. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
  24. 24Oberauer, K., Awh, E., & Sutterer, D. W. (2017). The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 122. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000302
  25. 25Parra, M. A., Abrahams, S., Logie, R. H., & Sala, S. D. (2009). Age and binding within-dimension features in visual short-term memory. Neuroscience Letters, 449(1), 15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.069
  26. 26Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  27. 27Sutterer, D. W., & Awh, E. (2016). Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 831841. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0937-x
  28. 28Treisman, A., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance: Vol. VI (pp. 333361). DOI: 10.4324/9781003309734-20
  29. 29Troyer, A. K., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 54(3), 161171. DOI: 10.1037/h0087338
  30. 30Wilton, R. N. (1989). The structure of memory: Evidence concerning the recall of surface and background colour of shapes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41(3-A), 579598. DOI: 10.1080/14640748908402383
  31. 31Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: Neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 10661079. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.390 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 17, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2024
Published on: Jul 23, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Hiu Wah Cheung, Nicolas Geeraert, Vanessa M. Loaiza, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.