References
- 1Anstis, S. M., & Cavanagh, P. (1983).
A minimum motion method for judging equiluminance . In J. D. Mollon & L. T. Sharpe (Eds.), Color vision: Physiology and psychophysics (pp. 156–166). New York: Academic Press. - 2Baker, C. I., Olson, C. R., & Behrmann, M. (2004). Role of attention and perceptual grouping in visual statistical learning. Psychological Science, 15(7), 460–466. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00702.x
- 3Britton, M. K., & Anderson, B. A. (2020). Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(3), 324–334. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000718
- 4Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 1–38. DOI: 10.5334/joc.72
- 5Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive psychology, 36(1), 28–71. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
- 6Conway, C. M. (2020). How does the brain learn environmental structure? Ten core principles for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 279–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.032
- 7Curcio, C. A., Sloan, K. R., Kalina, R. E., & Hendrickson, A. E. (1990). Human photoreceptor topography. Journal of comparative neurology, 292(4), 497–523. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902920402
- 8Duncan, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention. Cortex, 131, 54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.006
- 9Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(1), 86–95. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01672-z
- 10Ferrante, O., Patacca, A., di Caro, V., della Libera, C., Santandrea, E., & Chelazzi, L. (2018). Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering. Cortex, 102, 67–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027
- 11Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458–467. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.458
- 12Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2019). Statistical learning research: A critical review and possible new directions. Psychological Bulletin, 145(12), 1128–1153. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000210
- 13Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13(6), 520–525. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00491
- 14Golan, A., & Lamy, D. (2022). Is Statistical Learning of a Salient Distractor’s Color Implicit, Inflexible and Distinct From Inter-Trial Priming? Journal of cognition, 5(1). DOI: 10.5334/joc.243
- 15Golan, A., & Lamy, D. (2023). Attentional guidance by target-location probability cueing is largely inflexible, long-lasting, and distinct from inter-trial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001220
- 16Hall, M. G., Mattingley, J. B., & Dux, P. E. (2015). Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 1112–1123. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000069
- 17Horváth, K., Török, C., Pesthy, O., Nemeth, D., & Janacsek, K. (2020). Divided attention does not affect the acquisition and consolidation of transitional probabilities. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79232-y
- 18Jiang, Y. (2018). Habitual versus goal-driven attention. Cortex, 102, 107–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018
- 19Jiang, Y., Swallow, K. M., Won, B. Y., Cistera, J. D., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2014). Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(1), 50–66. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7
- 20Li, Q., Joo, S. J., Yeatman, J. D., & Reinecke, K. (2020). Controlling for participants’ viewing distance in large-scale, psychophysical online experiments using a virtual chinrest. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57204-1
- 21Liesefeld, H. R., Lamy, D., Gaspelin, N., Geng, J. J., Kerzel, D., Schall, J. D., … & Wolfe, J. (2024). Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1–28. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3
- 22Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & cognition, 22(6), 657–672. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209251
- 23Musz, E., Weber, M. J., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2015). Visual statistical learning is not reliably modulated by selective attention to isolated events. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 78–96. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0757-5
- 24Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
- 25Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70(1), 27–52. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00075-4
- 26Stilwell, B. T., Bahle, B., & Vecera, S. P. (2019). Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(3), 419–433. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000613
- 27Thaler, L., Schütz, A. C., Goodale, M. A., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2013). What is the best fixation target? The effect of target shape on stability of fixational eye movements. Vision research, 76, 31–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.012
- 28Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(1), 83–90. DOI: 10.3758/BF03211619
- 29Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606. DOI: 10.3758/BF03211656
- 30Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978).
Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems . In J. Castellan & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory. Vol. 3. (pp. 200–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. - 31Turatto, M., Bonetti, F., Pascucci, D., & Chelazzi, L. (2018). Desensitizing the attention system to distraction while idling: A new latent learning phenomenon in the visual attention domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1827. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000503
- 32Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 552–564. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.552
- 33van Moorselaar, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2021). Statistical distractor learning modulates perceptual sensitivity. Journal of Vision, 21(12), 3. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.12.3
- 34Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018a). How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(4), 860–870. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z
- 35Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018b). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(7), 1763–1774. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3
- 36Wang, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2018c). Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 13. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000472
- 37Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121–134. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.121
- 38Yu, R. Q., & Zhao, J. (2015). The persistence of the attentional bias to regularities in a changing environment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2217–2228. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0930-5
- 39Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013). Attention is Spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612460407