Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interindividual Differences in Cognitive Variability Are Ubiquitous and Distinct From Mean Performance in a Battery of Eleven Tasks Cover

Interindividual Differences in Cognitive Variability Are Ubiquitous and Distinct From Mean Performance in a Battery of Eleven Tasks

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

joc-7-1-371-g1.png
Figure 1

Shows three of the eleven cognitive tasks used a) visuospatial working memory crush, b) Number pals, and c) a 2D Mental Rotation task. For illustration purposes we randomly sampled one subject from the bottom 10% of the WM Crush variability distribution (in blue), and one subject from the top 10% (in red). The same subjects were then plotted for b) number pals and c) 2D Mental Rotation. We then plotted their logged response times by trial number, limiting the x-axis to the sample mean trial number of that task. Next, density plots show the distribution of our measures of cognitive variability factor scores extracted from dynamic SEM and the relative position of the two subjects (blue & red). Cognitive variability is modeled using a log-linear model, to preclude negative values. Note, however, that the logarithm of the variance can be negative as seen in the x-axis of the density plot.

joc-7-1-371-g2.png
Figure 2

Illustrates interindividual variability measures (n = 2,608) in response time from Dynamic SEM across 11 cognitive tasks. Panel a) shows a Pearson r correlation plot with only significant (Holm’s multiple comparison correction) associations colored, while panel b) shows the loadings (SI Table 4) for the first three factors in an exploratory factor analysis. The first factor (‘Working Memory’) captured 22% of the variance, the second (‘Mathematical Reasoning’) accounted for 9%, while the last (‘Tangram’) accounted for 6% of the variance. Panel c) shows the correlations between these three factors while d) illustrates the relationship of each variability factor with a single factor of mean level (i.e., Mean Performance).

Table 1

Task Overview – number of trials and response time (RT) descriptives.

TASKTOTAL TRIALSMEDIAN TRIALS PER CHILDRT MEDIANRT IQRRT MINRT MAX
WM_3dgrid (3DGrid)20373878.127502.751502.504088.012344.00
WM_circle (circle)15587859.777604.501406.624125.013004.00
WM_crush (crush)24351193.377356.751547.504100.010830.00
WM_grid (grid)430708165.157868.001319.003798.015205.00
WM_moving (move)8564033.347508.001471.504149.012348.50
WM_numbers (num)9830037.948017.001405.005754.023362.50
Number pals (npals)2398463919.663659.50640.251846.08139.00
Numberline (nline)1833909703.196102.502201.382617.015905.00
Non-verbal reasoning (nvr)548101210.166780.751655.254088.012344.00
Rotation (rot)1032751395.993420.751118.384125.013004.00
Tangram (tan)17312866.387502.751502.504100.010830.00
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.371 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2024
Accepted on: May 6, 2024
Published on: May 21, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Nicholas Judd, Michael Aristodemou, Torkel Klingberg, Rogier Kievit, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.