Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Two Attentional Processes Subserving Working Memory Differentiate Gifted and Mainstream Students Cover

Two Attentional Processes Subserving Working Memory Differentiate Gifted and Mainstream Students

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Mean Performance Scores as a Function of Grade and Academic Stream.

VARIABLEGRADE 4GRADE 8
MAINSTREAM M (SD)GIFTED M (SD)MAINSTREAM M (SD)GIFTED M (SD)
Age9.86 (0.38)9.78 (0.30)13.80 (0.26)13.61 (0.33)
N-back
    0-back prop. correct0.91 (0.08)0.91 (0.08)0.94 (0.07)0.94 (0.06)
    1-back prop. correct0.72 (0.15)0.81 (0.20)0.78 (0.14)0.83 (0.08)
    2-back prop. correct0.47 (0.15)0.50 (0.15)0.49 (0.21)0.72 (0.21)
SOPT mean span4.36 (0.82)4.46 (0.86)4.91 (1.00)5.06 (0.82)
    6 stimuli3.65 (0.87)3.80 (0.90)4.09 (0.73)4.16 (0.64)
    8 stimuli4.44 (1.29)4.56 (1.35)4.86 (1.29)5.14 (1.23)
    10 stimuli5.00 (1.37)5.01 (1.63)5.79 (1.92)5.89 (1.51)
U-SOPT mean span2.61 (1.09)3.08 (1.02)3.98 (1.22)3.98 (1.18)
    6 stimuli2.14 (1.02)2.65 (1.10)3.27 (1.15)3.37 (1.17)
    8 stimuli3.09 (1.55)3.50 (1.46)4.68 (1.41)4.60 (1.68)
FIT M-score4.36 (1.18)5.43 (1.40)6.14 (1.56)6.89 (0.94)
DFT M-score4.59 (0.73)5.18 (0.77)5.36 (0.85)6.16 (1.30)
CNT efficiency0.41 (0.25)0.44 (0.18)0.48 (0.22)0.73 (0.21)
    Trial 14.84 (1.03)5.23 (0.91)6.65 (0.78)6.75 (1.02)
    Trial 24.24 (1.08)4.27 (0.94)5.50 (1.06)5.97 (1.00)
    Trial 31.70 (0.60)1.74 (0.54)1.92 (0.66)2.71 (0.67)
    Trial 41.08 (0.65)1.18 (0.45)1.36 (0.69)2.01 (0.55)
Antisaccade prop. correct0.68 (0.15)0.74 (0.14)0.79 (0.18)0.89 (0.08)

[i] Note: 0-back = 0-back level of the n-back Task; 1-back = 1-back level of the n-back Task; 2-back = 2-back level of the n-back Task; SOPT = Self-Ordered Pointing Task; U-SOPT = Updating Self-Ordered Pointing Task; FIT = Figural Intersections Task; DFT = Direction Following Task; CNT = Contingency Naming Task.

Table 2

Correlations between Tasks as a Function of Academic Stream, with Age Partialled.

12345678
1.FIT M-Score.37*.92**.37*.54**.35*.40**.27
2.DFT M-score.14.71**.29.40**.41**.42**.30
3.Mean M-score.81**.70**.41**.58**.45**.48**.33*
4.2-back prop. correct.15.21.23.36*.08.38*.46**
5.SOPT span score.21-.04.13.15.38*.41**.16
6.U-SOPT span score.21.20.27.19.27.32*.10
7.CNT total efficiency.23.09.22.02.08.29*.33*
8.Antisaccade prop. correct.21-.13.08.28.23-.02.10

[i] Note: Correlations coefficients for mainstream sample (n = 44) are presented above the diagonal, and coefficients for gifted sample (n = 47) are presented below the diagonal. FIT = Figural Intersections Test; DFT = Direction Following Test; Mean M-score = average of FIT and DFT; 2-back = 2-back level of the n-back Task; SOPT = Self-Ordered Pointing Task; U-SOPT = Updating Self-Ordered Pointing Task; CNT = Contingency Naming Task. *p < .05. **p < .01.

joc-7-1-370-g1.png
Figure 1

N-back mean proportion correct target identifications, as a function of grade, academic stream, and n-back condition. Error bars represent standard errors.

joc-7-1-370-g2.png
Figure 2

Contingency Naming Task (CNT) efficiency score, as a function of grade and CNT trial. Error bars represent standard errors.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.370 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2024
|
Accepted on: May 6, 2024
|
Published on: May 23, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Janice Johnson, Steven J. Howard, Juan Pascual-Leone, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.