References
- Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access for handwritten words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 906–923. DOI: 10.1037/a0019258
- Benyhe, A., & Csibri, P. (2021). Can rotated words be processed automatically? Evidence from rotated repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1163–1171. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01147-4
- Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
- Blythe, H. I., Juhasz, B. J., Tbaily, L. W., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2019). Reading sentences of words with rotated letters: An eye movement study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1790–1804. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818810381
- Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: a tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1, 1–20. DOI: 10.5334/joc.10
- Bürkner, P.-C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395. DOI: 10.32614/RJ-2018-017
- Chen, C., Abbasi, N. ul H., Song, S., Chen, J., & Li, H. (2016). The Limited Impact of Exposure Duration on Holistic Word Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 646. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00646
- Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Response to Carreiras et al: The role of visual similarity, feedforward, feedback and lateral pathways in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(11), 456–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.009
- Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
- Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
- Fernández-López, M., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2023). Letter rotations: through the magnifying glass and What evidence found there. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 38(2), 127–138. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2093390
- Fernández-López, M., Mirault, J., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2021). How resilient is reading to letter rotations? A parafoveal preview investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(12), 2029–2042. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000999
- Fiset, D., Blais, C., Arguin, M., Tadros, K., Éthier-Majcher, C., Bub, D., & Gosselin, F. (2009). The spatio-temporal dynamics of visual letter recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(1), 23–35. DOI: 10.1080/02643290802421160
- Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 335–359. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
- Grainger, J. (2022).
Word Recognition I: Visual and Orthographic Processing . In M. J. Snowling, C. Hulme, & K. Nation (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook, Second Edition (60–78). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781119705116.ch3 - Grainger, J., & Dufau, S. (2012).
The front end of visual word recognition . In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 159–184). Psychology Press. - Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: on the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3, 128–156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
- Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 381–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006
- Hannagan, T., Ktori, M., Chanceaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a Turing Test Reveals about Human Cognition. PLoS ONE, 7(3),
e32121 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032121 - Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. MIT Press.
- Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
- Kim, A. E., & Straková, J. (2012). Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stage visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1468, 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.008
- Lanthier, S. N., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2009). Not all visual features are created equal: Early processing in letter and word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 67–73. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.67
- Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2021). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Package ‘emmeans’.
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.htm - Madec, S., Rey, A., Dufau, S., Klein, M., & Grainger, J. (2012). The Time Course of Visual Letter Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(7), 1645–1655. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00178
- Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2018). Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 44, 699–706. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000477
- Molinaro, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., Marín-Gutiérrez, A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). From numbers to letters: Feedback regularization in visual word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1343–1355. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.037
- Peirce, J. W., & MacAskill, M. R. (2018).
Building experiments in PsychoPy . Sage. - Perea, M. (2012). Revisiting Huey: On the importance of the upper part of words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 1148–1153. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0304-0
- Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 237–241. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.237
- Perea, M., Gil-López, C., Beléndez, V., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1631–1647. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091016
- Perea, M., Marcet, A., Labusch, M., Baciero, A., & Fernández-López, M. (2023). Computational models, educational implications, and methodological innovations: The realm of visual word recognition. Psicológica, 44(2),
e15259 . DOI: 10.20350/digitalCSIC/15259 - Perea, M., Marcet, A., Lozano, M., & Gomez, P. (2018). Is masked priming modulated by memory load? A test of the automaticity of masked identity priming in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 46, 1127–1135. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0825-5
- Petit, J.-P., & Grainger, J. (2002). Masked partial priming of letter perception. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 337–353. DOI: 10.1080/13506280042000207
- Qiao, E., Vinckier, F., Szwed, M., Naccache, L., Valabrègue, R., & Dehaene, S., et al. (2010). Unconsciously deciphering handwriting: Subliminal invariance for handwritten words in the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 49, 1786–1799. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.034
- R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org . - Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
- Rey, A., Courrieu, P., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009a). Item performance in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 600–608. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.600
- Rey, A., Dufau, S., Massol, S., & Grainger, J. (2009b) Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level event-related potentials, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 7–22. DOI: 10.1080/09541440802176300
- Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1019–1025. DOI: 10.1038/14819
- Robotham, R. J., & Starrfelt, R. (2017). Face and word recognition can be selectively affected by brain injury or developmental disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01547
- Rolls, E. T. (2000). Functions of the primate temporal lobe cortical visual areas in invariant visual object and face recognition. Neuron, 27(2), 205–218. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00030-1
- Rosa, E., Perea, M., & Enneson, P. (2016). The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique. Acta Psychologica, 169, 133–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016
- Schwarz, W., & Miller, J. (2012). Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 555–574. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0254-6
- Szwed, M., Cohen, L., Qiao, E., & Dehaene, S. (2009). The role of invariant line junctions in object and visual word recognition. Vision Research, 49(7), 718–725. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.003
- Ventura, P. (2014). Let’s face it: Reading acquisition, face and word processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 787. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00787
- Ventura, P., Fernandes, T., Pereira, A., Guerreiro, J. C., Farinha-Fernandes, A., Delgado, J., Ferreira, M. F., Faustino, B., Raposo, I., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2020). Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2739–2750. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-01988-2
- Ventura, P., Pereira, A., Xufre, E., Pereira, M., Ribeiro, S., Ferreira, I., Madeira, M., Martins, A., & Domingues, M. (2019). Holistic word context does not influence holistic processing of artificial objects in an interleaved composite task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(6), 1767–1780. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01812-6
- Vergara-Martínez, M., Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Perea, M., Gil-López, C., & Carreiras, M. (2021). The time course of processing handwritten words: An ERP investigation. Neuropsychologia, 159, 107924. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107924
- Vinckier, F., Qiao, E., Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The impact of letter spacing on reading: A test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Journal of Vision, 11(6), 8. DOI: 10.1167/11.6.8
- Wilson, K. D., & Taylor, J. M. (2009). Letters, not words, are processed holistically. Perception, 38(10), 1572–1574. DOI: 10.1068/p6514