Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Modulate Perspective Taking in Listeners Cover

Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Modulate Perspective Taking in Listeners

Journal of Cognition
Volume 6 (2023): Issue 1
By: Jia E. Loy and  Vera Demberg  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. 1Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Selected papers of hirotugu akaike (pp. 199–213). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
    Back to article
  2. 2Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2017). An approach for determining the number of clusters in a model-based cluster analysis. Entropy, 19(9), 452. DOI: 10.3390/e19090452
    Back to article
  3. 3Apperly, I. A., & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological review, 116(4), 953. DOI: 10.1037/a0016923
    Back to article
  4. 4Apšvalka, D., Ferreira, C. S., Schmitz, T. W., Rowe, J. B., & Anderson, M. C. (2022). Dynamic targeting enables domain-general inhibitory control over action and thought by the prefrontal cortex. Nature communications, 13(1), 274. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27926-w
    Back to article
  5. 5Arnold, G., Spence, C., & Auvray, M. (2016). Taking someone else’s spatial perspective: Natural stance or effortful decentring? Cognition, 148, 27–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.006
    Back to article
  6. 6Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the autism spectrum quotient (aq). Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 451–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.022
    Back to article
  7. 7Banfield, J. D., & Raftery, A. E. (1993). Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 803–821. DOI: 10.2307/2532201
    Back to article
  8. 8Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (aq): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 31(1), 5–17. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005653411471
    Back to article
  9. 9Bartoń, K. (2023). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (R package version 1.47.5).
    Back to article
  10. 10Beller, S., Bohlen, J., Hüther, L., & Bender, A. (2016). Perspective taking in referring to objects behind versus in front of an observer: Frames of reference, intraindividual consistency, and response latencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(7), 1384–1408. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1083593
    Back to article
  11. 11Biernacki, C., & Govaert, G. (1997). Using the classification likelihood to choose the number of clusters. Computing Science and Statistics, 451–457.
    Back to article
  12. 12Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS one, 5(5), e106953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
    Back to article
  13. 13Brookman-Byrne, A., Mareschal, D., Tolmie, A. K., & Dumontheil, I. (2018). Inhibitory control and counterintuitive science and maths reasoning in adolescence. PLoS One, 13(6), e0198973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198973
    Back to article
  14. 14Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 893–900. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.893
    Back to article
  15. 15Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J. E. (2011). Talking in another person’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialogue & Discourse, 2(1), 11–33. DOI: 10.5087/dad.2011.102
    Back to article
  16. 16Cavanaugh, J. E. (1999). A large-sample model selection criterion based on Kullback’s symmetric divergence. Statistics & Probability Letters, 42(4), 333–343. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7152(98)00200-4
    Back to article
  17. 17Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    Back to article
  18. 18Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
    Back to article
  19. 19Clements-Stephens, A. M., Vasiljevic, K., Murray, A. J., & Shelton, A. L. (2013). The role of potential agents in making spatial perspective taking social. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 497. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00497
    Back to article
  20. 20de Boer, M. M., Quené, H., & Heeren, W. F. (2022). Long-term within-speaker consistency of filled pauses in native and non-native speech. JASA Express Letters, 2(3), 035201. DOI: 10.1121/10.0009598
    Back to article
  21. 21Diamond, A., & Taylor, C. (1996). Development of an aspect of executive control: Development of the abilities to remember what I said and to “Do as I say, not as I do”. Developmental psychobiology, 29(4), 315–334. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199605)29:4<;315::AID-DEV2>3.0.CO;2-T
    Back to article
  22. 22Duran, N. D., Dale, R., & Kreuz, R. J. (2011). Listeners invest in an assumed other’s perspective despite cognitive cost. Cognition, 121(1), 22–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.009
    Back to article
  23. 23Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., & Carlo, G. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6), 993. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.993
    Back to article
  24. 24Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
    Back to article
  25. 25Erle, T. M., & Topolinski, S. (2015). Spatial and empathic perspective-taking correlate on a dispositional level. Social Cognition, 33(3), 187–210. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2015.33.3.187
    Back to article
  26. 26Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009). Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. In International conference on universal access in human-computer interaction (pp. 39–48). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5
    Back to article
  27. 27Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. Developmental psychology, 17(1), 99. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
    Back to article
  28. 28Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.63
    Back to article
  29. 29Freed, E. M., Hamilton, S. T., & Long, D. L. (2017). Comprehension in proficient readers: The nature of individual variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 97, 135–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.008
    Back to article
  30. 30Frick, A., & Baumeler, D. (2017). The relation between spatial perspective taking and inhibitory control in 6-year-old children. Psychological research, 81(4), 730–739. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0785-y
    Back to article
  31. 31Friedman, A., Kohler, B., Gunalp, P., Boone, A. P., & Hegarty, M. (2020). A computerized spatial orientation test. Behavior research methods, 52(2), 799–812. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01277-3
    Back to article
  32. 32Galati, A., Dale, R., & Duran, N. D. (2019). Social and configural effects on the cognitive dynamics of perspective-taking. Journal of Memory and Language, 104, 1–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.007
    Back to article
  33. 33Galati, A., Weisberg, S., Newcombe, N., & Avraamides, M. (2015). Individual differences in spatial ability influence the effect of gesturing on navigation and spatial memory. Proceedings of Gesture and Speech in Interaction-4th edition (GESPIN 4), 119–124.
    Back to article
  34. 34Gardner, M., Brazier, M., Edmonds, C. J., & Gronholm, P. (2013). Strategy modulates spatial perspective-taking: evidence for dissociable disembodied and embodied routes. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 457. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00457
    Back to article
  35. 35Hamilton, A. F. d. C., Brindley, R., & Frith, U. (2009). Visual perspective taking impairment in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Cognition, 113(1), 37–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.007
    Back to article
  36. 36Harris, L. J., & Strommen, E. A. (1972). The role of front-back features in children’s front, back, and beside placements of objects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 18(3), 259–271.
    Back to article
  37. 37Hasshim, N., & Parris, B. A. (2021). The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(10), 1657–1668. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211032548
    Back to article
  38. 38Hayashi, Y. (2018). The power of a “Maverick” in collaborative problem solving: An experimental investigation of individual perspective-taking within a group. Cognitive science, 42, 69–104. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12587
    Back to article
  39. 39Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior research methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
    Back to article
  40. 40Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
    Back to article
  41. 41Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2019). Great expectations? Relation of previous experiences with social robots in real life or in the media and expectancies based on qualitative and quantitative assessment. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 939. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00939
    Back to article
  42. 42Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59(1), 91–117. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)81418-1
    Back to article
  43. 43Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C. C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem. Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 277–299. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90015-7
    Back to article
  44. 44Inagaki, H., Meguro, K., Shimada, M., Ishizaki, J., Okuzumi, H., & Yamadori, A. (2002). Discrepancy between mental rotation and perspective-taking abilities in normal aging assessed by Piaget’s three-mountain task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(1), 18–25. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.24.1.18.969
    Back to article
  45. 45Job, X., Kirsch, L., Inard, S., Arnold, G., & Auvray, M. (2021). Spatial perspective taking is related to social intelligence and attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 109726. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109726
    Back to article
  46. 46Kapantzoglou, M., Restrepo, M. A., Gray, S., & Thompson, M. S. (2015). Language ability groups in bilingual children: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(5), 1549–1562. DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0290
    Back to article
  47. 47Kessler, K., & Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of visuo-spatial perspective taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 213. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00213
    Back to article
  48. 48Kessler, K., & Wang, H. (2012). Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 12(2–3), 133–158. DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2011.634533
    Back to article
  49. 49Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745–756. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200477
    Back to article
  50. 50Kuijper, S. J., Hartman, C. A., & Hendriks, P. (2021). Children’s pronoun interpretation problems are related to theory of mind and inhibition, but not working memory. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 1999. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610401
    Back to article
  51. 51Loy, J., & Demberg, V. (2022). Partner effects and individual differences on perspective taking. In Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 44, pp. 86–92).
    Back to article
  52. 52Mainwaring, S. D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M., & Schiano, D. J. (2003). Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial cognition and computation, 3(1), 3–42. DOI: 10.1207/S15427633SCC0301_2
    Back to article
  53. 53May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive psychology, 48(2), 163–206. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00127-0
    Back to article
  54. 54Menchaca-Brandan, M. A., Liu, A. M., Oman, C. M., & Natapoff, A. (2007). Influence of perspective-taking and mental rotation abilities in space teleoperation. In Proceedings of the acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 271–278). DOI: 10.1145/1228716.1228753
    Back to article
  55. 55Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & psychophysics, 68, 327–337. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193680
    Back to article
  56. 56Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Level 1 perspective-taking at 24 months of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 603–613. DOI: 10.1348/026151005X55370
    Back to article
  57. 57Money, J., Alexander, D., & Walker, H. (1965). A standardized road-map test of direction sense. Johns Hopkins Press.
    Back to article
  58. 58Muto, H. (2021). Correlational evidence for the role of spatial perspective-taking ability in the mental rotation of human-like objects. Experimental Psychology, 68(1), 41–48. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000505
    Back to article
  59. 59Muto, H., Matsushita, S., & Morikawa, K. (2018). Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 337. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000464
    Back to article
  60. 60Muto, H., Matsushita, S., & Morikawa, K. (2019). Object’s symmetry alters spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 191, 103987. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.024
    Back to article
  61. 61Newcombe, N., & Huttenlocher, J. (1992). Children’s early ability to solve perspective-taking problems. Developmental psychology, 28(4), 635–643. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.635
    Back to article
  62. 62Paulus, C. (2009). Der saarbrücker persönlichkeitsfragebogen spf (iri) zur messung von empathie. Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
    Back to article
  63. 63Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The coordination of perspectives. In The child’s conception of space (Vol. 8, pp. 209–246). Norton and Company New York.
    Back to article
  64. 64Puntiroli, M., Moussaoui, L. S., & Bezençon, V. (2022). Are consumers consistent in their sustainable behaviours? a longitudinal study on consistency and spillover. Journal of Business Research, 144, 322–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.075
    Back to article
  65. 65Qureshi, A. W., Apperly, I. A., & Samson, D. (2010). Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition, 117(2), 230–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.003
    Back to article
  66. 66R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
    Back to article
  67. 67Rosenberg, J. M., Beymer, P. N., Anderson, D. J., Van Lissa, C. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2018). tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 978. Retrieved from https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.00978. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00978
    Back to article
  68. 68Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Kathirgamanathan, U., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Seeing it my way: a case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. Brain, 128(5), 1102–1111. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh464
    Back to article
  69. 69Schinazi, V. R., Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2013). Hippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans. Hippocampus, 23(6), 515–528. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22111
    Back to article
  70. 70Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition, 47(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90060-9
    Back to article
  71. 71Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 461–464. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
    Back to article
  72. 72Shelton, A. L., Clements-Stephens, A. M., Lam, W. Y., Pak, D. M., & Murray, A. J. (2012). Should social savvy equal good spatial skills? The interaction of social skills with spatial perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 199. DOI: 10.1037/a0024617
    Back to article
  73. 73Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive psychology, 43(4), 274–310. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0758
    Back to article
  74. 74Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Spatial memory and perspective taking. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 416–426. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195835
    Back to article
  75. 75Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
    Back to article
  76. 76Silvera, D., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 42(4), 313–319. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00242
    Back to article
  77. 77Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. International journal of social robotics, 6(2), 229–247. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0
    Back to article
  78. 78Stewart, M. E., & Austin, E. J. (2009). The structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from a student sample in Scotland. Personality and individual differences, 47(3), 224–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.004
    Back to article
  79. 79Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643. DOI: 10.1037/h0054651
    Back to article
  80. 80Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013a). Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 129(2), 426–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.008
    Back to article
  81. 81Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013b). The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 698. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00698
    Back to article
  82. 82Surtees, A., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults. Child development, 83(2), 452–460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01730.x
    Back to article
  83. 83Surtees, A., Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Direct and indirect measures of level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 75–86. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02063.x
    Back to article
  84. 84Tomasello, M. (2009). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard university press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjsf4jc
    Back to article
  85. 85Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
    Back to article
  86. 86Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and motor skills, 47(2), 599–604. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
    Back to article
  87. 87Wang, M.-C., Deng, Q., Bi, X., Ye, H., & Yang, W. (2017). Performance of the entropy as an index of classification accuracy in latent profile analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 1473–1482. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01473
    Back to article
  88. 88Wang, R. F. (2005). Beyond imagination: Perspective change problems revisited. Psicólogica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 26(1), 25–38.
    Back to article
  89. 89Ward, S. L., Newcombe, N., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Turn left at the church, or three miles north: A study of direction giving and sex differences. Environment and Behavior, 18(2), 192–213. DOI: 10.1177/0013916586182003
    Back to article
  90. 90Wardlow, L. (2013). Individual differences in speakers’ perspective taking: The roles of executive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 766–772. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0396-1
    Back to article
  91. 91Weisberg, S. M., Schinazi, V. R., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2014). Variations in cognitive maps: Understanding individual differences in navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 669. DOI: 10.1037/a0035261
    Back to article
  92. 92Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: a guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. DOI: 10.1177/0095798420930932
    Back to article
  93. 93Wilke, F., Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2019). Flexibility in adopting relative frames of reference in dorsal and lateral settings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(10), 2393–2407. DOI: 10.1177/1747021819841310
    Back to article
  94. 94Wolf, S. M. (1973). Difficulties in right-left discrimination in a normal population. Archives of neurology, 29(2), 128–129. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1973.00490260072017
    Back to article
  95. 95Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 151. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.151
    Back to article
  96. 96Xiao, C., Xu, L., Sui, Y., & Zhou, R. (2021). Do people regard robots as human-like social partners? Evidence from perspective-taking in spatial descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4039. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244
    Back to article
  97. 97Yadollahi, E., Couto, M., Dillenbourg, P., & Paiva, A. (2022). Do children adapt their perspective to a robot when they fail to complete a task. In Interaction design and children (pp. 341–351). DOI: 10.1145/3501712.3529719
    Back to article
  98. 98Yeh, Y.-Y., Wang, C.-C., Cheng, S.-k., & Chiu, C.-D. (2021). Dissociation of posture remapping and cognitive load in level-2 perspective-taking. Cognition, 214, 104733. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104733
    Back to article
  99. 99Zhang, T., Sha, W., Zheng, X., Ouyang, H., & Li, H. (2009). Inhibiting one’s own knowledge in false belief reasoning: an ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 467(3), 194–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.009
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.321 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 21, 2023
Published on: Sep 1, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
individual differences;,
perspective taking,
interaction,
spatial orientation

© 2023 Jia E. Loy, Vera Demberg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 6 (2023): Issue 1