Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Manipulability Effect in Object Naming Cover

The Manipulability Effect in Object Naming

Open Access
|May 2018

References

  1. 1Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(39), 1521415218. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805867105
  2. 2Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59(4), 390412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  3. 3Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50(3), 560585. DOI: 10.1080/783663595
  4. 4Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 148. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  5. 5Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 26(2), 211252. Series B.
  6. 6Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS one, 5(5), e10773. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
  7. 7Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12(4), 478484. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
  8. 8Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35(1), 116124. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195503
  9. 9Goslin, J., Galluzzi, C., & Romani, C. (2014). PhonItalia: a phonological lexicon for Italian. Behavior research methods, 46(3), 872886. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0400-8
  10. 10Guérard, K., Lagacé, S., & Brodeur, M. B. (2015). Four types of manipulability ratings and naming latencies for a set of 560 photographs of objects. Behavior research methods, 47(2), 443470. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0488-5
  11. 11Harrell, F. R., Jr. (2017). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.0-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
  12. 12Harris, I. M., Murray, A. M., Hayward, W. G., O’callaghan, C., & Andrews, S. (2012). Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1228. DOI: 10.1037/a0029035
  13. 13Hothorn, T., Buehlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A., & Van Der Laan, M. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistics, 7(3), 355373. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011
  14. 14Matheson, H. E., White, N., & McMullen, P. A. (2014). Testing the embodied account of object naming: A concurrent motor task affects naming artifacts and animals. Acta psychologica, 145, 3343. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.012
  15. 15Protopapas, A. (2007). Check Vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859862. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192979
  16. 16R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
  17. 17Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111163. DOI: 10.2307/271063
  18. 18Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 3358. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001
  19. 19Salmon, J. P., Matheson, H. E., & McMullen, P. A. (2014). Slow categorization but fast naming for photographs of manipulable objects. Visual Cognition, 22(2), 141172. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.887042
  20. 20Scaltritti, M., Arfe, B., Torrance, M., & Peressotti, F. (2016). Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements. Cognition, 156, 1629. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006
  21. 21Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics. 6(2), 461464. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
  22. 22Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174215. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
  23. 23Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  24. 24Witt, J. K., Kemmerer, D., Linkenauger, S. A., & Culham, J. (2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21(9), 12151219. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610378307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.30 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 27, 2018
Published on: May 25, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Anna Lorenzoni, Francesca Peressotti, Eduardo Navarrete, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.