Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Landmark Sequence Learning from Real-World Route Navigation and the Impact of Navigation Aid Visualisation Style Cover

Landmark Sequence Learning from Real-World Route Navigation and the Impact of Navigation Aid Visualisation Style

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. 1Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  2. 2Bornstein, B. H., Neely, C. B., & Lecompte, D. C. (1995). Visual distinctiveness can can enhance recency effects. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 273278. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/326. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197229
  3. 3Cortis Mack, C., Cinel, C., Davies, N., Harding, M., & Ward, G. (2017). Serial position, output order, and list length effects for words presented on smartphones over very long intervals. Journal of Memory and Language, 97, 6180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.009
  4. 4Dahmani, L., & Bohbot, V. D. (2020). Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation. Scientific Reports, 10(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0
  5. 5de Sanctis, P., Solis-Escalante, T., Seeber, M., Wagner, J., Ferris, D. P., & Gramann, K. (2021). Time to move: Brain dynamics underlying natural action and cognition. In European Journal of Neuroscience, 54, 12, 80758080. John Wiley and Sons Inc. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15562
  6. 6Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2015). Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15(4), 246284. DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2015.1059432
  7. 7Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., & Renzaglia, G. J. (1983). Studies of the Long-Term Recency Effect: Support for a Contextually Guided Retrieval Hypothesis. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 2. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.2.231
  8. 8Healey, M. K., Long, N. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2019). Contiguity in episodic memory Basic properties of the contiguity effect Finding 1: Temporal contiguity in free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 699720. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3
  9. 9Hilton, C., Wiener, J., & Johnson, A. (2021). Serial memory for landmarks encountered during route navigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211020745
  10. 10Kapaj, A., Hilton, C., Lanini-Maggi, S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2023, May 17). The influence of landmark visualization style on task performance, visual attention, and spatial learning in a real-world navigation task. PsyArXiv Preprint. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/abfp7. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/abfp7
  11. 11Montello, D. R. (2009). Navigation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610448.008
  12. 12Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S., Hitch, G. J., Hurlstone, M. J., Ma, W. J., Morey, C. C., Nee, D. E., Schweppe, J., Vergauwe, E., & Ward, G. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(9), 885958. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000153
  13. 13Park, J. L., Dudchenko, P. A., & Donaldson, D. I. (2018). Navigation in real-world environments: New opportunities afforded by advances in mobile brain imaging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(September), 112. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00361
  14. 14R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  15. 15Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks: GIScience for Intelligent Services. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3
  16. 16Ruginski, I. T., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Stefanucci, J. K., & Cashdan, E. (2019). GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 1220. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001
  17. 17Schweizer, K., Herrmann, T., Janzen, G., & Katz, S. (1998). The Route Direction Effect and its Constraints. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-69342-4_2
  18. 18Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Mendelsohn, A. (2019). Real-Life Neuroscience: An Ecological Approach to Brain and Behavior Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 841859. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619856350
  19. 19Strickrodt, M., O’Malley, M., & Wiener, J. M. (2015). This place looks familiar-how navigators distinguish places with ambiguous landmark objects when learning novel routes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC), 112. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01936
  20. 20Waller, D., & Lippa, Y. (2007). Landmarks as beacons and associative cues. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 910924. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193465
  21. 21Ward, G., Tan, L., & Grenfell-Essam, R. (2010). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: The effects of list length and output order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 12071241. DOI: 10.1037/a0020122
  22. 22Wenczel, F., Hepperle, L., & von Stülpnagel, R. (2017). Gaze behavior during incidental and intentional navigation in an outdoor environment. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 17(1–2), 121142. DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2016.1226838
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.307 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 15, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2023
Published on: Jul 12, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Christopher Hilton, Armand Kapaj, Sara I. Fabrikant, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.