Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A New Corpus of Lexical Substitution and Word Blend Errors: Probing the Semantic Structure of Lemma Access Failures Cover

A New Corpus of Lexical Substitution and Word Blend Errors: Probing the Semantic Structure of Lemma Access Failures

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. 1Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–734. DOI: 10.1080/01690960802597250
  2. 2Alderete, J. (2019). Simon Fraser University Speech Error Database – English Beta, [www.sfu.ca/people/alderete/sfused] Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University (Distributor).
  3. 3Alderete, J., & Davies, M. (2019). Investigating perceptual biases, data reliability, and data discovery in a methodology for collecting speech errors from audio recordings. Language and Speech, 62, 281–317. DOI: 10.1177/0023830918765012
  4. 4Alderete, J., & Tupper, P. (2018). Phonological regularity, perceptual biases, and the role of grammar in speech error analysis. WIREs Cognitive Science, 9, e1466. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1466
  5. 5Arnaud, P. J. L. (1999). Target-error resemblance in French word substitution speech errors and the mental lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 269287. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716499002052
  6. 6Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production. Grammatical encoding. M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945984). Academic Press.
  7. 7Butterworth, B. (1982). Speech errors: Old data in search of new theories. A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 73108). Mounton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110828306.73
  8. 8Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 728). Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110828306.7
  9. 9Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283321. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
  10. 10Dell, G. S., Kelley, A. C., Hwang, S., & Bian, Y. (2021). The adaptable speaker: A theory of implicit learning in language production. Psychological Review, 128, 446487. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000275
  11. 11Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801838. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
  12. 12Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505520.
  13. 13Ferber, R. (1995). Reliability and validity of slip-of-the-tongue corpora: A methodological note. Linguistics, 33, 11691190. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1995.33.6.1169
  14. 14Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. I. Speech and talk (pp. 177220). Academic Press.
  15. 15Garrett, M. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 1976). Academic Press.
  16. 16Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2001). What makes a good neighbor? Evidence from malapropisms. Brain and Language, 79, 141143.
  17. 17Harley, T. A., & MacAndrew, S. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitution speech errors. Journal of Psychological Research, 30(4), 395418. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010421724343
  18. 18Hotopf, W. H. N. (1980). Semantic similarity as a factor in whole-word slips of the tongue. V. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 97109). Academic Press.
  19. 19Jaeger, J. J. (2005). Kids’ slips. What young children’s slips of the tongue reveal about language development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: 10.4324/9781410611550
  20. 20Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
  21. 21Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 175. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
  22. 22Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460499. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
  23. 23Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martine, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121133. DOI: 10.1037/t56477-000
  24. 24Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107142. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
  25. 25Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
  26. 26Stemberger, J. P. (1982/1985). The lexicon in a model of language production. Garland.
  27. 27Stemberger, J. P. (1993). Spontaneous and evoked slips of the tongue. G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C.-W. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies. An international handbook (pp. 5365). Walter de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110113242.1.53
  28. 28Vinson, D., Andrews, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Giving words meaning: Why better models of semantics are needed in language production research. M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 134151). Oxford University Press.
  29. 29Wan, I.-P., & Ting, J. (2019). Semantic relationships in Mandarin speech errors. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 17, 3366.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.278 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 2, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 14, 2023
Published on: May 18, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 John Alderete, Melissa Baese-Berk, Adrian Brasoveanu, Jess H. K. Law, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.