References
- Becker, S. I. (2010). The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 247–265. DOI: 10.1037/a0018808
- Becker, S. I., Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2009). Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search? Vision Research, 49, 1738–1756. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.001
- Becker, S. I., Lewis, A. J., & Axtens, J. E. (2017). Top-down knowledge modulates onset capture in a feedforward manner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 436–446. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1134-2
- Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326–341. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.2.326
- Benoni, H. (2018). Top-down prioritization of salient items may produce so-called stimulus-driven capture. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218
- Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cogntive Neuroscience, 20, 1423–1433. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
- Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–11. DOI: 10.1167/7.6.1
- Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16, 215–231. DOI: 10.1080/13506280701458804
- Irons, J. L., & Leber, A. B. (2016). Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 2031–2048. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1125-4
- Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999). Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron, 22, 751–761. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80734-5
- Kiss, M., Grubert, A., Petersen, A., & Eimer, M. (2012). Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 749–759. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127
- Martin, A., & Becker, S. I. (in revision). How feature relationships influence attention and eye movements: Evidence from eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
- Mulckhuyse, M., Van Zoest, W., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 225–235. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1226-3
- Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 605–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018
- TheeuwesJ. (2018). Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional. Journal of Cognition, 1(1),
29 . DOI: 10.5334/joc.13 - Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774