
Figure 1
(A) The proportion and latencies of first eye movements to distractors that matched a word-cue announcing the target colour (Cued), mismatched the word cue but had a possible target colour (Non-cued) and distractors with a non-target colour (Unrelated). There were no differences in the timing of the 8% fastest saccades (12 bins), but a higher proportion of eye movements to the distractor that had the upcoming target colour. (B) Analysing the data in the same way as in Mulckhuyse et al., showed the typical results pattern of longer latencies for the earliest 20% of saccades to the cued distractor than to the non-matching or unrelated distractor (due to the fact that the distribution of the cued distractor has a longer tail; see Becker et al., 2017, Exp. 2).
