Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reply to Theeuwes: Fast Feature-based Top-down Effects, but Saliency May be Slow Cover

Reply to Theeuwes: Fast Feature-based Top-down Effects, but Saliency May be Slow

Open Access
|May 2018

Figures & Tables

joc-1-1-23-g1.png
Figure 1

(A) The proportion and latencies of first eye movements to distractors that matched a word-cue announcing the target colour (Cued), mismatched the word cue but had a possible target colour (Non-cued) and distractors with a non-target colour (Unrelated). There were no differences in the timing of the 8% fastest saccades (12 bins), but a higher proportion of eye movements to the distractor that had the upcoming target colour. (B) Analysing the data in the same way as in Mulckhuyse et al., showed the typical results pattern of longer latencies for the earliest 20% of saccades to the cued distractor than to the non-matching or unrelated distractor (due to the fact that the distribution of the cued distractor has a longer tail; see Becker et al., 2017, Exp. 2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.23 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 6, 2018
|
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2018
|
Published on: May 14, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Stefanie I. Becker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.