References
- Bogon, J., Thomaschke, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Binding time: Evidence for integration of temporal stimulus features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1290–1296. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1330-9
- Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1265–1270. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000673
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action-effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action-effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000022
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Fournier, L. R., & Gallimore, J. M. (2013). What makes an event: Temporal integration of stimuli or actions? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1293–1305. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0461-x
- Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2012). The horserace between distractors and targets: Retrieval-based probe responding depends on distractor–target asynchrony. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 582–590. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2012.666852
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be…Included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1209–1227. DOI: 10.1037/a0023915
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2017). How perception guides action: Figure-ground segmentation modulates integration of context features into S-R episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1720–1729. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000403
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). Affective matching moderates S-R binding. Cognition & Emotion, 25(2), 342–350. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.482765
- Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55(4), 270–279. DOI: 10.1007/BF00419687
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–78; discussion 878–937. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. NY: Holt. DOI: 10.1037/10538-000
- Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387–394. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.387
- Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 57(1), 87–106. DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000143
- Laub, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2018). Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1474–1488. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1526-7
- Mayr, S., Möller, M., & Buchner, A. (2018). Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(8), 1918–1931. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1574-z
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(4), 959–978. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019a). Binding processes in the control of nonroutine action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(9), 1135–1145. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000665
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019b). From simple to complex actions: Response-response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 174–183. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000483
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019c). Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(1), 325–331. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1493-y
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019d). Response-response binding across effector-set switches. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1974–1979. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01669-8
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2021). Response-response bindings do not decay for 6 seconds after integration: A case for bindings’ relevance in hierarchical action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(4), 508–517. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000897
- Moeller, B., Rothermund, K., & Frings, C. (2012). Integrating the irrelevant sound. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 258–264. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000151
- Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Pfister, R. (2019). Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control. Psychological Review, 126(1), 153–161. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000140
- Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/09541449208406240
- Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. DOI: 10.1080/713752551
- Schmalbrock, P., Kiesel, A., & Frings, C. (2022). What Belongs Together Retrieves Together – The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), Article 28. DOI: 10.5334/joc.217
- Schöpper, L.-M., Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The official soundtrack to “Five shades of grey”: Generalization in multimodal distractor-based retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(7), 3479–3489. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02057-4
- Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
- Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0154-5
- Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis (Vol. 2). Reading, MA.
- van Dam, W. O., & Hommel, B. (2010). How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1184–1192. DOI: 10.1037/a0019955
- Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. DOI: 10.1037/a0029333
- Zmigrod, S., Spapé, M., & Hommel, B. (2009). Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action. Psychological Research, 73(5), 674–684. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0163-5