Figure 1
(a) Sequence of events in Experiments 1 and 2 in one example trial. Participants gave two successive responses, R1 and R2, both to the prime and to the probe. This is an example of a R1 repetition and R2 change trial in the non-grouped condition. The stimuli and effects are not drawn to scale. (b) Effect positions depending on effect grouping condition and Experiment. (c) Response-response binding effects in response times across Experiments 1 and 2 as a function of effect grouping (grouped vs. non-grouped). Binding effects were calculated as R1 repetition minus R1 change RTs for R2 change trials, subtracted from R1 repetition minus R1 change RTs for R2 repetition trials [(R1cR2r – R1rR2r) – (R1cR2c – R1rR2c)] (d) Distribution of difference in mean response-response binding effects between effect grouping conditions (calculated as [grouped]–[non-grouped] for each participant) for Experiment 1 and 2. Solid lines indicate medians; dashed lines indicate means.
Table 1
Mean response times (in milliseconds) and mean error rates (in percentages) for probe responses R2, as a function of effect grouping, R1 relation and R2 relation between prime and probe.
| GROUPED EFFECTS | NON-GROUPED EFFECTS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 REPETITION | R2 CHANGE | R2 REPETITION | R2 CHANGE | |
| R1 change | 692 (9.1) | 628 (2.4) | 708 (9.6) | 650 (5.4) |
| R1 repetition | 668 (7.9) | 672 (8.2) | 690 (8.2) | 676 (5.6) |
Table 2
Mean response times (in milliseconds) and mean error rates (in percentages) for probe responses R2, as a function of effect grouping, as well as R1 relation and R2 relation between prime and probe.
| GROUPED EFFECTS | NON-GROUPED EFFECTS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 REPETITION | R2 CHANGE | R2 REPETITION | R2 CHANGE | |
| R1 change | 677 (7.4) | 619 (2.1) | 675 (8.5) | 622 (3.9) |
| R1 repetition | 664 (6.0) | 653 (4.5) | 654 (6.3) | 646 (6.5) |