References
- 1Atkinson, R. C., Herrmann, D. J., & Wescourt, K. T. (1974).
Search processes in recognition memory . In: Solso, R. L. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium, 101–146. Potomac: Erlbaum. - 2Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In: Kornblum, S. (ed.), Fourth international symposium on attention and performance, 583–611. New York:
Academic Press . - 3Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14325–14329. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105
- 4Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339–1348. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1339
- 5Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1–21. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193807
- 6Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-process accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 6.1–6.24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
- 7Göthe, K., & Oberauer, K. (2008). The integration of familiarity and recollection information in short-term recognition: Modeling speed-accuracy trade-off functions. Psychological Research, 72, 289–303. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0111-9
- 8Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2016). Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings. Cognition, 150, 92–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003
- 9Green, C., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Attentional limits in memory retrieval – revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1083–1098. DOI: 10.1037/a0023095
- 10Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001
- 11Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
- 12Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
- 13MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- 14Magen, H. (2017). The role of central attention in retrieval from visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 423–430. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1111-9
- 15Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
- 16McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.346
- 17Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3
- 18Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90008-7
- 19Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). BayesFactor (Version 0.9.12.2). Retrieved from:
http://cran.at.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html . - 20Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193–251. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0767
- 21Nelson, J. K., Reuter-Lorenz, P., Sylvester, C.-Y. C., Jonides, J., & Smith, E. E. (2003). Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11171–11175. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1334125100
- 22Neumann, O. (1984).
Automatic processing: a review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory . In: Prinz, W., & Sanders, A. F. (eds.), Cognition and motor processes, 255–293. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_17 - 23Nino, R. S., & Rickard, T. C. (2003). Practice effects on two memory retrievals from a single cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 373–388. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.373
- 24Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(4), 948–957. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.4.948
- 25Oberauer, K. (2003). Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 469–483. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00080-9
- 26Oberauer, K. (2008). How to say no: Single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 439–459. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.439
- 27Oberauer, K. (2016). Test of a dual-process model of short-term recognition using the PRP paradigm. Retrieved from:
https://osf.io/gpmbh/ . - 28Oberauer, K. (2017). Test of a dual-process model of short-term recognition using the PRP paradigm, Part II. Retrieved from:
https://osf.io/gpmbh/ . - 29Öztekin, I., & McElree, B. (2010). Relationship between measures of working memory capacity and the time course of short-term memory retrieval and interference resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 383–397. DOI: 10.1037/a0018029
- 30Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
- 31R_Core_Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.3). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from URL:
http://www.R-project.org . - 32Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 11–163. DOI: 10.2307/271063
- 33Rickard, T. C., & Bajic, D. (2004). Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access? Cognitive Psychology, 48, 243–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.07.002
- 34Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review, 111, 588–616. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.588
- 35Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
- 36Shepherdson, P., Oberauer, K., & Souza, A. S. (2017). Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: a diffusion model account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000448
- 37Strobach, T., Schubert, T., Pashler, H., & Rickard, T. C. (2014). The specificity of learned parallelism in dual-memory retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 42, 552–569. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0382-x
- 38Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
- 39Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Jonston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268–1283. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1268
- 40Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025–1054. DOI: 10.1037/a0020874
- 41Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1341–1354. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341
- 42Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864