References
- Chao, H. F. (2009). Revisiting the prime-probe contextual similarity effect on negative priming: The impact of cue variability. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 484–500. DOI: 10.1080/09541440802049051
- Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 177–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Eben, C., Koch, I., Jolicoeur, P., & Nolden, S. (2020). The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1835–1846. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01909-y
- Ernst, D., Becker, S., & Horstmann, G. (2020). Novelty competes with saliency for attention. Vision Research, 168, 42–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.01.004
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Fox, E., & De Fockert, J. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 107–113. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209464
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Moller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2017). How perception guides action: Figure-ground segmentation modulates integration of context features into SR episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1720–1729. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000403
- Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The negative priming paradigm: An update and implications for selective attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1577–1597. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0841-4
- Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
- Giesen, C. G., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2927. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 1067–1082. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1067
- Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11(4), 483–521. DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000400
- Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files – object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175–219. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
- Knapp, B. R., & Batchelder, W. H. (2004). Representing parametric order constraints in multi-trial applications of multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48(4), 215–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2004.03.002
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 932–943. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.932
- Mayr, S., Möller, M., & Buchner, A. (2018). Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(8), 1918–1931. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1574-z
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014). Attention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 76(4), 959–978. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9
- Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2016). The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 464–479. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000158
- Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 42–54. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
- Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1291–3105. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1291
- Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming – steady-state or decay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 18(3), 565–576. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.565
- NIOSH. (2016). NIOSH Sound Level Meter (version 1.2.2) [Mobile app]. In Apple App Store.
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/niosh-sound-level-meter/id1096545820 - Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 613–623. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.613
- Parmentier, F. B. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.005
- Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195-203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie. (2016). Berufsethische Richtlinien. Retrieved from
https://www.dgps.de/fileadmin/documents/Empfehlungen/berufsethische_richtlinien_dgps.pdf - Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022). Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes. Attention Perception & Psychophysics (in press). DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5
- Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 1148–1148. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1148
- Seymour, K., Clifford, C. W., Logothetis, N. K., & Bartels, A. (2009). The coding of color, motion, and their conjunction in the human visual cortex. Current Biology, 19(3), 177–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.050
- Schmidt, J. R., De Houwer, J., & Rothermund, K. (2016). The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 82–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.004
- Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The role of location in the organization of bindings within short-term episodic traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(5), 512–524. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000729
- Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 203-220. DOI: 10.3758/Bf03196157
- Stecker, G. C., Harrington, I. A., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (2005). Location coding by opponent neural populations in the auditory cortex. PLoS Biololgy, 3(3),
e78 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030078 - Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect – inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37(4), 571–590. DOI: 10.1080/14640748508400920
- Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6(2), 171–178. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(96)80070-5
- Uncapher, M. R., Hutchinson, J. B., & Wagner, A. D. (2011). Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(35), 12613–12628. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0152-11.2011
- Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. DOI: 10.1037/a0029333
- Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(4), 442–452. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442
- Wong, K. F. E. (2000). Dissociative prime-probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1411–1422. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1411