
Figure 1
Illustration of the erroneous probe response with the previously executed prime response in ignored repetition trials.
Note: Targets and correct responses are in black, distractors and incorrect responses are in grey.

Figure 2
Example of the trial procedure. Primes are shown for the ignored repetition (upper) and control (lower) conditions with an identical probe.
Note: The contextual stimuli are not presented in the figure. The response interval was 100–3000 ms.

Figure 3
The multinomial processing tree model in the ignored repetition and the control conditions.
Note: The figure was taken from Qiu et al. (2022).

Figure 4
Descriptive findings in reaction times and error rates.
Note: A) Reaction times as a function of Trial Type, Context Relation and Context Variability; B) Error rates as a function of Trial Type, Context Relation and Context Variability. The error bars depict the standard errors of the means.

Figure 5
Probability estimates for the model parameters representing the probability of prime-response retrieval (prr) as a function of Trial Type, Context Relation and Context Variability.
Note: The error bars depict the standard errors of the parameter estimates. Annotation shows significant comparisons indicating configural and binary binding of the context. The symbols “**” and “*” indicate p < .01 and p < .05, respectively.
