References
- 1Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50–68. DOI: 10.1037/a0014411
- 2Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369
- 3Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
- 4Clark, E. V. (1978).
Awareness of Language: Some Evidence from what Children Say and Do . In The child’s conception of language (pp. 17–43). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-67155-5_2 - 5Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Prevention and correction in post-error performance: an ounce of prevention, a pound of cure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 692–709. DOI: 10.1037/a0030014
- 6de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1–12. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
- 7Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: a Contribution to Experimental Psychology (original work published in 1885). New York: Dover. DOI: 10.1037/10011-000
- 8Ficarella, S. C., Rochet, N., & Burle, B. (2019). Becoming aware of subliminal responses: An EEG/EMG study on partial error detection and correction in humans. Cortex, 120, 443–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.007
- 9Gauvin, H. S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). Towards a new model of verbal monitoring. Journal of Cognition, 3(1). DOI: 10.5334/joc.81
- 10Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural Control of Speech. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10471.001.0001
- 11Gureckis, T. M., Martin, J., McDonnell, J., Rich, A. S., Markant, D., Coenen, A., … Chan, P. (2016). psiTurk: An open-source framework for conducting replicable behavioral experiments online. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 829–842. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0642-8
- 12Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–45. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3158
- 13Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4
- 14Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38–75. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
- 15Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2015). Auditory feedback Is used for self-comprehension: When we hear ourselves saying something other than what we said, we believe we said what we hear. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1978–80. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615599341
- 16Liu, X., Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Do you know where your fingers have been? Explicit knowledge of the spatial layout of the keyboard in skilled typists. Memory & Cognition, 38(4), 474–84. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.474
- 17Logan, F. A. (1999). Errors in Copy Typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1760–1773. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1760
- 18Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- 19Logan, G. D. (2018). Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, 125(4), 453–485. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000100
- 20Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2010). Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists. Science, 330(6004), 683–6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1190483
- 21Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2011). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: the case for skilled typewriting. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 1–27. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00001-2
- 22Makowski, D. (2018). The psycho Package: an Efficient and Publishing-Oriented Workflow for Psychological Science. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(22), 470. DOI: 10.21105/joss.00470
- 23Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
- 24Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P., & Kok, A. (2001). Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. Psychophysiology, 38(5), 752–760. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3850752
- 25Nooteboom, S. G., & Quené, H. (2020). Repairing speech errors: Competition as a source of repairs. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104069. November 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104069
- 26Nooteboom, S. G., & Quené, H. (2019). Temporal aspects of self-monitoring for speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 43–59. January 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.11.002
- 27Nozari, N. (2020). A comprehension- or a production-based monitor? Response to Roelofs (2019). Journal of Cognition 3(1). DOI: 10.5334/joc.102
- 28Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63(1), 1–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
- 29Nozari, N., & Hepner, C. R. (2019). To select or to wait? The importance of criterion setting in debates of competitive lexical selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 36(5–6), 193–207. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2018.1476335
- 30Nozari, N., Martin, C. D., & McCloskey, N. (2019). Is repairing speech errors an automatic or a controlled process? Insights from the relationship between error and repair probabilities in English and Spanish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1230–1245. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1637007
- 31Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (2009). A model linking immediate serial recall, the Hebb repetition effect and the learning of phonological word forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3737–3753. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0173
- 32Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2018). “Twisting fingers”: The case for interactivity in typed language production. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(4), 1449–1457. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1452-7
- 33Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2020). Electrophysiological Correlates of Monitoring in Typing with and without Visual Feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(4), 603–620. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01500
- 34Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2021). The role of visual feedback in detecting and correcting typing errors: A signal detection approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 117, 104193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104193
- 35Pinet, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(6), 1898–1906. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1044-3
- 36Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a Skilled Typist : A Study of Skilled Cognitive-Motor Performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.
- 37Servant, M., White, C., Montagnini, A., & Burle, B. (2015). Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 35(28), 10371–85. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-15.2015
- 38Snyder, K. M., Ashitaka, Y., Shimada, H., Ulrich, J. E., & Logan, G. D. (2014). What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(1), 162–71. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0548-4
- 39Wessel, J. R. (2012). Error awareness and the error-related negativity: evaluating the first decade of evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–16. April. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00088
- 40Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple Paired Forward and Inverse Models for Motor Control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317–1329. Retrieved from citeulike-article-id:1216100. DOI: 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5
- 41Yamaguchi, M., Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2013). Speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled typewriting: decomposing the contributions of hierarchical control loops. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 678–99. DOI: 10.1037/a0030512