Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Time-Course of the Last-Presented Benefit in Working Memory: Shifts in the Content of the Focus of Attention Cover

The Time-Course of the Last-Presented Benefit in Working Memory: Shifts in the Content of the Focus of Attention

Open Access
|Jan 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overview of studies using an item-recognition task, together with the duration of Item presentation and of Delay, and whether or not a last-presented benefit was observed. Studies are listed from the shortest (0 ms) to longest (4800 ms) Delay duration.

AUTHORITEM PRESENTATIONDELAYLAST-PRESENTED BENEFIT
Morin, DeRosa, & Stultz, 1967500 ms0 msYes
Monsell, 1978400 ms100 msYes
Vergauwe & Langerock, 2017250 ms150 msYes
McElree & Dosher, 1989500 ms300 msYes
Nee & Jonides, 2008500 ms300 msYes
Corballis, 1967150 ms450 msYes
Burrows & Okada, 1971500 ms500 msYes
Donskin & Nosofsky, 2012500 ms600 msYes
Monsell, 1978400 ms600 msYes
Clifton & Birenbaum, 19701500 ms800 msYes
Corballis, 1967300 ms900 msYes
Vergauwe & Langerock, 2017250 ms1150 msNo
Donskin & Nosofsky, 20121000 ms2000 msNo
Burrows & Okada, 19711200 ms2400 msYes
Clifton & Birenbaum, 19701500 ms2800 msNo
Clifton & Birenbaum, 19701500 ms4800 msNo

[i] Note: Studies included in the table were item-recognition tasks with sequential item presentation, sub-span memory lists, simple verbal materials, single probes and healthy young adults as participants. Duration delay runs from the offset of the last memory item to the presentation of the probe and thus includes the sum of empty delays, and potential sensory masks or warning images for the test images.

joc-5-1-199-g1.png
Figure 1

Illustration of the events on a single trial in Experiments 1 and 2.

joc-5-1-199-g2.png
Figure 2

Mean response times in ms for probes matching the last-presented item (“last”) vs. probes matching other list items (“not-last”) in Experiments 1 and 2, together with the evidence in the data (Bayes factors) for (in green) or against (in red) the last-presented benefit in each delay condition. Note that the bars showing data from Experiment 1 have a blue border, while bars showing data from Experiment 2 have an orange border. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.199 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 25, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 27, 2021
Published on: Jan 7, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Beatrice Valentini, Kim Uittenhove, Evie Vergauwe, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.