References
- 1Al-Bayatti, M., & Jones, B. E. (2003). Statistical study of the differences in candidates’ results between first and second attempts in some GCE AS units. BERA.
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003197.htm - 2Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-Based Regulation of Study-Time Allocation: When Agendas Override Item-Based Monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432–447. DOI: 10.1037/a0015928
- 3Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193014
- 4Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (1998). Academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 329–346. DOI: 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80126-5
- 5Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(November 2012), 417–444. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
- 6Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.002
- 7Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
- 8Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436. DOI: 10.1163/156856897X00357
- 9Burr, S., Morrison, J. M., & Salih, V. M. (2018). When another assessment attempt is bad for progress. MedEdPublish, 7(3), 1–11. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000147.1
- 10Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
- 11Centre for Education Research and Policy. (2012a). Should the best mark count when resitting at A-level? 3644723, 1–3.
- 12Centre for Education Research and Policy. (2012b). What is the impact of resitting at A-level? 3644723, 3–5.
- 13Cull, W. L., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1994). The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners? Memory & Cognition, 22, 249–257. DOI: 10.3758/BF03208896
- 14Davidson, W. B., Beck, H. P., & Milligan, M. (2009). The college persistence questionnaire: Development and validation of an instrument that predicts student attrition. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 373–390. DOI: 10.1353/csd.0.0079
- 15Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13, 597–607. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597
- 16Elikai, F., & Schuhmann, P. W. (2010). An examination of the impact of grading policies on students’achievement. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 677–693. DOI: 10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.677
- 17Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- 18Feather, N. T. (1959). Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty. Psychological Review, 66, 150–164. DOI: 10.1037/h0045692
- 19Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. DOI: 10.1257/089533005775196732
- 20Grabe, M. (1994). Motivational deficiencies when multiple examinations are allowed. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 45–52. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1005
- 21Irwin, J. R., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Hypothetical and real consequences in experimental auctions for insurance against low probability risks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 107–116. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.3960050203
- 22Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 638–652. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8
- 23Johnson, B. G., & Beck, H. P. (1988). Strict and Lenient Grading Scales: How Do They Affect the Performance of College Students with High and Low SAT Scores? Teaching of Psychology, 15(3), 127–131. DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top1503_4
- 24Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
- 25Kickert, R., Meeuwisse, M., Arends, L. R., Prinzie, P., & Stegers-Jager, K. M. (2020). Assessment policies and academic progress: differences in performance and selection for progress. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1845607
- 26Kickert, R., Meeuwisse, M., Stegers-Jager, K. M., Koppenol-Gonzalez, G. V., Arends, L. R., & Prinzie, P. (2019). Assessment policies and academic performance within a single course: the role of motivation and self-regulation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1177–1190. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1580674
- 27Kickert, R., Stegers-Jager, K. M., Meeuwisse, M., Prinzie, P., & Arends, L. R. (2018). The role of the assessment policy in the relation between learning and performance. Medical Education, 52, 324–335. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13487
- 28Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., Pelli, D. G., Broussard, C., Wolf, T., & Niehorster, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, S14. DOI: 10.1068/v070821
- 29Kooreman, P. (2013a). Corrigendum to “Rational students and resit exams” [Econom. Lett. 118 (1) (2013) 213–215]. Economics Letters, 121, 141–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.07.005
- 30Kooreman, P. (2013b). Rational students and resit exams. Economics Letters, 118, 213–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.015
- 31Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187–194. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187
- 32Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265–299. DOI: 10.3102/00346543060002265
- 33Lafferty, T., & Higbee, K. L. (1974). Realism and risk taking. Psychological Reports, 34, 827–829. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3.827
- 34Levin, I. P., Chapman, D. P., & Johnson, R. D. (1988). Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 29–41. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.3960010105
- 35Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Wild, A., Knight, P., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1–16. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v088.i02
- 36Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 203–208. DOI: 10.3758/BF03204766
- 37Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760–768. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.760
- 38Mak, M. H. C., & Twitchell, H. (2020). Evidence for preferential attachment: Words that are more well connected in semantic networks are better at acquiring new links in paired-associate learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 1059–1069. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01773-0
- 39Mathôt, S. (2017). Bayes like a Baws: Interpreting Bayesian Repeated Measures in JASP.
https://www.cogsci.nl/blog/interpreting-bayesian-repeated-measures-in-jasp - 40MathWorks, T. (2017). MATLAB (R2017b). In The MathWorks Inc.
- 41McManus, I. C. (1992). Does performance improve when candidates resit a postgraduate examination? Medical Education, 26, 157–162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00142.x
- 42Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
- 43Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174–179. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.174
- 44Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A Region of Proximal Learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463–477. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001
- 45Michaelis, J., & Schwanebeck, B. (2016). Examination rules and student effort. Economics Letters, 145, 65–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.019
- 46Nijenkamp, R., Nieuwenstein, M. R., De Jong, R., & Lorist, M. M. (2016). Do resit exams promote lower investments of study time? Theory and data from a laboratory study. PLoS ONE, 11(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161708
- 47Nijenkamp, R., Nieuwenstein, M. R., De Jong, R., & Lorist, M. M. (2018). Controlling the Resit Effect by Means of Investment Depreciation. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.5334/joc.40
- 48Non, A., & Tempelaar, D. (2016). Time preferences, study effort, and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 54, 36–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.06.003
- 49Pell, G., Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. (2009). The trouble with resits …. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 243–251. DOI: 10.1080/02602930801955994
- 50Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision. DOI: 10.1163/156856897X00366
- 51Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of Self-regulated Learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. DOI: 10.1080/00313830120074206
- 52Ricketts, C. (2010). A new look at resits: are they simply a second chance? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 351–356. DOI: 10.1080/02602931003763954
- 53Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
- 54Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
- 55Schmidt, H. G., Baars, G. J. A., Hermus, P., van der Molen, H. T., Arnold, I. J. M., & Smeets, G. (2021). Changes in examination practices reduce procrastination in university students. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2021.1875857
- 56Scott, E. P. (2012). Short-term gain at long-term cost? How resit policy can affect student learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(4), 431–449. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.714741
- 57Slovic, P. (1969). Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 434. DOI: 10.1037/h0027489
- 58Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2009). Simultaneous decisions at study: Time allocation, ordering, and spacing. Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 237–248. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-009-9049-1
- 59Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and Control Strategies in Study-Time Allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(1), 204–221. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
- 60Son, L. K., & Sethi, R. (2006). Metacognitive control and optimal learning. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 759–774. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_74
- 61Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000096
- 62Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024
- 63Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
- 64Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
- 65Undorf, M., & Ackerman, R. (2017). The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(6), 2003–2011. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1261-4
- 66Van Den Hurk, M. (2006). The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(2), 155–169. DOI: 10.1177/1469787406064752
- 67Wang, A. Y. (1983). Individual Differences in Learning Speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 300–311. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.2.300
- 68Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011). Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291–298. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406923
- 69Wilbrink, B. (1980).
Beleid bij tentamens en examens . In I. A. Vroeijenstijn (Ed.), Kwaliteitsverbetering hoger onderwijs. Vierde nationaal congres onderzoek van het wetenschappelijk onderwijs (pp. 380–409). Stichting Nationaal Congres. - 70Xu, S., Pan, Y., Wang, Y., Spaeth, A. M., Qu, Z., & Rao, H. (2016). Real and hypothetical monetary rewards modulate risk taking in the brain. Scientific Reports, 6. DOI: 10.1038/srep29520
- 71Yocarini, I. E., Bouwmeester, S., Smeets, G., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Systematic Comparison of Decision Accuracy of Complex Compensatory Decision Rules Combining Multiple Tests in a Higher Education Context. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(3), 24–39. DOI: 10.1111/emip.12186
- 72Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2