References
- 1Armstrong, B. C., Tokowicz, N., & Plaut, D. C. (2012). eDom: Norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1015–1027. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0199-8
- 2Armstrong, B. C., Zugarramurdi, C., Cabana, Á., Valle Lisboa, J., & Plaut, D. C. (2016). Relative meaning frequencies for 578 homonyms in two Spanish dialects: A cross-linguistic extension of the English eDom norms. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 950–962. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0639-3
- 3Berman, R., & Nir, B. (2010). The lexicon in writing–speech-differentiation. Written Language & Literacy, 13(2), 183–205. DOI: 10.1075/wll.13.2.01ber
- 4Betts, H. N. (2013). The influence of recent experience on semantic ambiguity resolution [Unpublished BSc dissertation]. University College London.
- 5Betts, H. N., Gilbert, R. A., Cai, Z. G., Okedara, Z. B., & Rodd, J. M. (2018). Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(7), 1130–1150. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000507
- 6Cai, Z. G., Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M., Gaskell, M. G., Farrar, Adler, S., & Rodd, J. M. (2017). Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 98, 73–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.003
- 7Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001).
The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements . In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 27–43). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. Retrieved fromhttp://psycnet.apa.orgbooks/10459/002 . DOI: 10.1037/10459-002 - 8Eligio, R. B., & Kaschak, M. P. (2020). Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words. PLOS ONE, 15(12),
e0243512 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243512 - 9Gaskell, M. G., Cairney, S. A., & Rodd, J. M. (2019). Contextual priming of word meanings is stabilized over sleep. Cognition, 182, 109–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.007
- 10Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Rodd, J. M. (2018). Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(10). DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000532
- 11Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Rodd, J. M. (2021). The relationship between sentence comprehension and lexical-semantic retuning. Journal of Memory and Language, 116,
104188 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104188 - 12Hayes, D. P. (1988). Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 572–585. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90027-7
- 13Maciejewski, G., & Klepousniotou, E. (2016). Relative Meaning Frequencies for 100 Homonyms: British eDom Norms. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 4(1). DOI: 10.5334/jopd.28
- 14Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2017). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
- 15Rodd, J. M. (2020). Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 411–427. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619885860
- 16Rodd, J. M., Cai, Z. G., Betts, H. N., Hanby, B., Hutchinson, C., & Adler, A. (2016). The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 16–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.006
- 17Rodd, J. M., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
- 18Rodd, J. M., Lopez Cutrin, B., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.08.002
- 19Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645–659. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4
- 20Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (2000). Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 49–82. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210725
- 21Twilley, L. C., Dixon, P., Taylor, D., & Clark, K. (1994). University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 111–126. DOI: 10.3758/BF03202766
- 22Vitello, S., & Rodd, J. M. (2015). Resolving Semantic Ambiguities in Sentences: Cognitive Processes and Brain Mechanisms. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(10), 391–405. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12160
- 23Wiley, J., George, T., & Rayner, K. (2018). Baseball fans don’t like lumpy batters: Influence of domain knowledge on the access of subordinate meanings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 93–102. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1251470