References
- Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 343–348. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414540169
- Berger, N., Richards, A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2019). Delayed reconfiguration of a non-emotional task set through reactivation of an emotional task set in task switching: an ageing study. Cognition and Emotion, 33, 1370–1386. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1567462
- Besner, D., & Care, S. (2003). A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 311–320. DOI: 10.1037/h0087434
- Besner, D., Risko, E. F., Stolz, J. A., White, D., Reynolds, M., O’Malley, S., & Robidoux, S. (2016). Varieties of attention: their roles in visual word identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 162–168. DOI: 10.1177/0963721416639351
- Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221–225. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209396
- Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. Neuroreport, 13, 427–431. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200203250-00013
- Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 15–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.022
- Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2007). Attentional capture by task-irrelevant fearful faces is revealed by the N2pc component. Biological Psychology, 74, 108–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.008
- Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423–33. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
- Elchlepp, H., Best, M., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2017). Shifting attention between visual dimensions as a source of the task switch cost. Psychological Science, 28, 470–481. DOI: 10.1177/0956797616686855
- Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Chambers, C. D., & Verbruggen, F. (2016). Proactive inhibitory control: a general biasing account. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 27–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.004
- Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., Mizon, G. A., & Monsell, S. (2012). A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1137–1154. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21277
- Elchlepp, H., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2015). A change of task prolongs early processes: evidence from ERPs in lexical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 299–325. DOI: 10.1037/a0038740
- Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2019). The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 955–965. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818771836
- Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
- Holmes, A., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2006). Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces. Neuroscience Letters, 394, 48–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.002
- Holmes, A., Vuilleumier, P., & Eimer, M. (2003). The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 174–184. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00268-9
- Itier, R., & Neath-Tavares, K. N. (2017). Effects of task demands on the early neural processing of fearful and happy facial expressions, Brain Research, 1663, 38–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.013
- Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497–509. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.497
- Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 464–489. DOI: 10.1037/a0019561
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching- a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 136, 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Kikumoto, A., Hubbard, J., & Mayr, U. (2016). Dynamics of task-set carry-over: evidence from eye-movement analyses. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 899–906. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0944-y
- Kinoshita, S., De Wit, B., & Norris, D. (2017). The magic of words reconsidered: investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 369–384. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000311
- Koch, I., Lawo, V., Fels, J., & Vorländer, M. (2011). Switching in the cocktail party: Exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1140–1147. DOI: 10.1037/a0022189
- Labuschagne, E. M., & Besner, D. (2015). Automaticity revisited: When print doesn’t activate semantics. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 117. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117
- Lavric, A., Clapp, A., East, A., Elchlepp, H., & Monsell, S. (2019). Is preparing for a language switch like preparing for a task switch? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 1224–1233. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000636
- Lavric, A., Mizon, G. A., & Monsell, S. (2008). Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1016–1029. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06372.x
- Lawo, V., Fels, J., Oberem, J., & Koch, I. (2014). Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: Exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2010–2024. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.898079
- Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Cornett, L., Goodin, Z., & Allen, P. A. (2008). On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 751–773. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.751
- Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (2010). Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1–16. DOI: 10.1037/a0015875
- Logan, G. D. (2005). The time it takes to switch attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 647–653. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196753
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 1142–1151. DOI: 10.1037/a0030409
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2016). The coupling between spatial attention and other components of task-set: A task-switching investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2248–2275. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1115112
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2017). Self-paced preparation for a task switch eliminates attentional inertia but not the performance switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 43, 862–873. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000347
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., Munteanu, C., & Monsell, S. (2014). Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1580–1602. DOI: 10.1037/a0036552
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research, 74, 255–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y
- MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
- Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 204–218. DOI: 10.1006/ccog.1997.0311
- Mayr, U., Kuhns, D., & Hubbard, J. (2014). Long-term memory and the control of attentional control. Cognitive Psychology, 72, 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.001
- Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
- Meiran, N. (2014).
The task-cuing paradigm: A user’s guide . In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control (pp. 45–73). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0003 - Meiran, N., & Marciano, H. (2002). Limitations in advance task preparation: Switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 30, 540–550. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194955
- Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99–115. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3510099
- Monsell, S. (2015).
Task-set control and task switching . In J. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds), The Handbook of Attention, (pp. 139–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Monsell, S. (2017).
Task set regulation . In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control, (pp. 29–49). Chichester, W. Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch2 - Monsell, S., Lavric, A., Strivens, A., & Paul, E. (2019). Can we prepare to attend to one of two simultaneous voices? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 966–982. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000650
- Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cueing paradigm measure “endogenous” task-set reconfiguration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
- Monsell, S., Taylor, T. J., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory & Cognition, 29, 137–151. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195748
- Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021–1035. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021
- Müller-Bardorff, M., Schulz, C., Peterburs, J., Bruchmann, M., Mothes-Lasch, M., Miltner, W., & Straube, T. (2016). Effects of emotional intensity under perceptual load: An event-related potentials (ERPs) study. Biological Psychology, 117, 141–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.03.006
- Neath-Tavares, K. N., & Itier, R. J. (2016). Neural processing of fearful and happy facial expressions during emotion-relevant and emotion-irrelevant tasks: a fixation-to-feature approach. Biological Psychology, 119, 122–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.013
- Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
- Neely, J. H., & Kahan, T. (2001).
Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation . In H. L. RoedigerIII , J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10394-005 - Nieuwenhuis, S., & Monsell, S. (2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 86–92. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196259
- Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.025
- Paulitzki, J. R., Risko, E. F., Oakman, J. M., & Stolz, J. A. (2008). Doing the unpleasant: How the emotional nature of a threat-relevant task affects task-switching. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 350–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.003
- Oriet, P., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1036–1049. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1036
- Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–83). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum . - Rellecke, J., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2012). Does processing of emotional facial expressions depend on intention? Time-resolved evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 90, 23–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.002
- Robidoux, S., & Besner, D. (2015). Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1709–1716. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0830-7
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225–237. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
- Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Components of attentional set-switching. Experimental Psychology, 52, 83–98. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.2.83
- Töllner, T., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2008). Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 531–542. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.531
- Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., Marcus, D. J., Westerlund, A., Casey, B. J., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
- Vachon, F., & Jolicoeur, P. (2011). Impaired semantic processing during task-set switching: Evidence from the N400 in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychophysiology, 48, 102–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01040.x
- Vachon, F., & Jolicœur, P. (2012). On the automaticity of semantic processing during task switching. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 611–626. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00149
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task Switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- Vant Wout, F., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2013). Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 1538–1551. DOI: 10.1037/a0031672
- Weidner, R., & Müller, H. J. (2009). Dimensional weighting of primary and secondary target-defining dimensions in visual search for singleton conjunction targets. Psychological Research, 73, 198–211. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0208-9
- Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291–298. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406923
- Yeung, N., Nystrom, L. E., Aronson, J. A., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). Between task competition and cognitive control in task switching. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1429–1438. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3109-05.2006