References
- 1Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological Processing as We Know It: An Analytical Review of Morphological Effects in Visual Word Identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232
- 2Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.001
- 3Antzaka, A., Acha, J., Carreiras, M., & Lallier, M. (2020). The deployment of young readers’ visual attention across orthographic strings: the influence of stems and suffixes. Scientific Studies of Reading. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1747470
- 4Baayen, H. R., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.807
- 5Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 6Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 937–942. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0120-y
- 7Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2014). Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1054–1061. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0752-9
- 8Beyersmann, E., Grainger, J., Casalis, S., & Ziegler, J. (2015). Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 115–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.001
- 9Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2015). Differences in the Processing of Prefixes and Suffixes Revealed by a Letter-Search Task. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(5), 360–373. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1057824
- 10Borleffs, E., Maassen, B. A. M., Lyytinen, H., & Zwarts, F. (2017). Measuring orthographic transparency and morphological-syllabic complexity in alphabetic orthographies: a narrative review. Reading & Writing, 30, 1617–1638. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-017-9741-5
- 11Brand, M., Giroux, I., Puijalon, C., & Rey, A. (2007). Syllable onsets are perceptual reading units. Memory & Cognition, 35, 966–973. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193469
- 12Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108(1), 243–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010
- 13Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How Early Does Morpholexical Reading Develop in Readers of a Shallow Orthography? Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 568–586. DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2548
- 14Casalis, S., Dusautoir, M., Colé, P., & Ducrot, S. (2009). Morphological effects in children word reading: A priming study in fourth graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 761–766. DOI: 10.1348/026151008X389575
- 15Casalis, S., Quémart, P., & Duncan, L. G. (2015). How language affects children’s use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: evidence from a cross-language study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00452
- 16Chambers, C. (2017). The Seven deadly Sins of Psychology: A manifesto for Reforming the Culture of Scientific Practice. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400884940
- 17Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
- 18Commissaire, E., & Casalis, S. (2018). The use and nature of grapheme coding during sub-lexical processing and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1324–1339. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318294
- 19Crepaldi, D., Hemsworth, L., Davis, C. J., & Rastle, K. (2015). Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(1), 113–128. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713
- 20Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., & Davis, C. J. (2010). Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 312–321. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.3.312
- 21Crepaldi, Keuleers, Mandera, & Brysbaert. (2013).
- 22Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
- 23Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
- 24Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1980). Missing -ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word’ endings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 247–262. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90212-1
- 25Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614551642
- 26Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E. (2017). Edge-Aligned Embedded Word Activation Initiates Morpho-orthographic Segmentation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 285–317. DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.009
- 27Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 45. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
- 28Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S. (2016). Masked morphological priming in German- speaking adults and children: Evidence from response time distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00929
- 29Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S. (2020). Morphological priming in children: Disentangling the effects of school-grade and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(6), 484–499. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1729768
- 30Hasenäcker, J., Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Investigating Developmental Trajectories of Morphemes as Reading Units in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000353
- 31Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333–344. DOI: 10.3758/BF03213975
- 32Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Medicine, 2(8),
e124 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 - 33Ktori, M., & Pitchford, N. J. (2008). Effect of orthographic transparency on letter position encoding: a comparison of Greek and English monoscriptal and biscriptal readers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 258–281. DOI: 10.1080/01690960701536797
- 34Ktori, M., & Pitchford, N. J. (2009). Development of letter position processing: Effects of age and orthographic transparency. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 180–198. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01394.x
- 35Lenth, R. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-square means. R package version 1.4.2.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans - 36Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(03), 513–532. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716411000191
- 37Massol, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M., & Grainger, J. (2013). Evidence for letter-specific position coding mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 8(7):
e68460 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068460 - 38McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
- 39Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112,
104092 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092 - 40Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Engelmann, F., & Suckow, K. (2018). Exploratory and Confirmatory Analyses in Sentence Processing: A Case Study of Number Interference in German. Cognitive Science, 42, 1075–1100. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12589
- 41Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation–verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89(5), 573–594. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.573
- 42Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- 43Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478–496. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.008
- 44Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Duncan, L. G. (2012). Exploring the Role of Bases and Suffixes When Reading Familiar and Unfamiliar Words: Evidence From French Young Readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(5), 424–442. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2011.584333
- 45Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. DOI: 10.1080/01690960802069730
- 46Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280. DOI: 10.1037/h0027768
- 47Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00078-5
- 48Schmalz, X., Mulatti, C., & Job, R. (2020). Letter position coding: effects of legal and illegal bigrams in masked transposed-letter priming. OSF Preprint.
https://osf.io/534js/ - 49Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
- 50Stevens, M., & Brysbaert, M. (2016).
When do we have enough power in language research? Evidence from priming studies . Unpublished manuscript, Ghent University. Available at:http://crr.ugent.be/papers/When%20do%20we%20have%20enough%20power%20in%20language%20research.pdf - 51Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
- 52Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(70)90005-8