Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Two Challenges to “Embodied Cognition” Research And How to Overcome Them Cover

Two Challenges to “Embodied Cognition” Research And How to Overcome Them

By: Rolf A. Zwaan  
Open Access
|Feb 2021

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
  2. Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. Journal of investigative medicine: the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 60(5), 768775. DOI: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d
  3. Field, S. M., Hoekstra, R., Bringmann, L., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2019). When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3? Collabra: Psychology, 5, 46. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.218
  4. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424436. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
  5. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 55865. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196313
  6. Isager, P. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Bahník, Š., Brandt, M., DeSoto, K. A., Giner-Sorolla, R., Krueger, J., et al. (2020). Deciding What to Replicate: A Formal Definition of ‘Replication Value’ and a Decision Model for Replication Study Selection. MetaArXiv, September 2, 2020. DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/2gurz
  7. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2, 196. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
  8. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Landy, J. F., Jia, M. (L.), Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Ebersole, C. R., Gronau, Q. F., Ly, A., van den Bergh, D., Marsman, M., Derks, K., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Proctor, A., Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Brady, W. J., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146(5), 451479. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000220
  10. Monshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., Ijzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 501515. DOI: 10.1177/2515245918797607
  11. Morey, R. D., et al. (in press). A Pre-registered, Multi-lab Non-replication of the Action-sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
  12. Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness initiative: Incentivising open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 150547. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150547
  13. Munafò, M. R., Chambers, C. D., Collins, A. M., Fortunato, L., & Macleod, M. R. (2020). Research Culture and Reproducibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 9193. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002
  14. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349: aac4716. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716
  15. Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six Challenges for Embodiment Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593599. DOI: 10.1177/0963721419866441
  16. Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531536. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612463401
  17. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 188194. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0
  18. Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., et al. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 33756. DOI: 10.1177/2515245917747646
  19. Simons, D. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 7680. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613514755
  20. Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 11231128. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617708630
  21. Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 5971. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613514450
  22. Wilson, M. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625636. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196322
  23. Yarkoni, T. (in press). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685
  24. Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229234. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008
  25. Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X17001972
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.151 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 3, 2020
|
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2021
|
Published on: Feb 16, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Rolf A. Zwaan, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.