Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reaching Out for Food: How Food Incentives Modulate Peripersonal Space Perception Cover

Reaching Out for Food: How Food Incentives Modulate Peripersonal Space Perception

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

joc-4-1-148-g1.png
Figure 1

Experimental procedure. A) Participants extended their right arm (blindfolded) to establish their peripersonal space. B) They were reminded to keep this posture in mind when making their reachability judgments. C) Stimuli from different categories were presented at seven distinct positions; position four was aligned with the maximum extension of the right hand. D) Yes or no responses were performed by the left hand while the right hand remained stationary next to the keyboard below the table.

Table 1

Stimulus characteristics taken from Blechert et al.’s (2014) database.

FOOD CATEGORIESTOTAL CALORIESVALENCE RATINGSOBJECT SIZEBRIGHTNESSCONTRASTCOMPLEXITY
High Calorie/High Valence490.5256.51.32537.5256.61.087
High Calorie/Neutral Valence490.2641.04.32636.4850.82.082
Low Calorie/High Valence71.4762.95.31134.2949.13.077
Low Calorie/Neutral Valence95.5243.74.31129.4353.77.088

[i] Note: Total calorie values expressed in Kcal, valence ratings from 1 (very low) to 100 (very high), object size (the proportion of non-white pixels relative to total number of pixels), brightness (the luminance of all non-white pixels of the grey-scale image and the white background), contrast (the SD of luminance across all non-white pixels of the gray-scale image), and complexity (for definition please see Blechert et al., 2014).

joc-4-1-148-g2.png
Figure 2

Mean scores of the perception of subjective reachability limit for each food category (calorie and valence) as a function of hungry and satiated. 0 (zero) indicates the true value of the maximal extension of the arm. Positive values indicate that the limits of reachability were further out, that is, peripersonal space was increased. Standard error (SE) shown as vertical lines.

joc-4-1-148-g3.png
Figure 3

Topography of maximal amplitudes of the P1 component between 116 and 140 ms in hungry and satiated conditions. Marked are the electrodes of the P1 ROI (70,74,75,82,83).

joc-4-1-148-g4.png
Figure 4

Topography of maximal amplitudes of the Late Positive Component between 300 and 548 ms in hungry and satiated conditions; marked are the electrodes used for data analysis (59-60-62-65-66-67-70-71-72-75-76-77-83-84-85-90-91).

joc-4-1-148-g5.png
Figure 5

Mean subjective reachability limits for each food category (calorie and valence) as a function of hungry and satiated. Conventions as in Figure 2.

joc-4-1-148-g6.png
Figure 6

ERP waveforms, pooled within the P1 ROI, in hungry and satiated condition in far and near space. Marked is the interval of the P1 amplitude analysis.

joc-4-1-148-g7.png
Figure 7

Mean amplitude of LPC in hungry and satiated condition in far and near space. Pooled ERPs electrodes from the parieto-occipital area (59-60-62-65-66-67-70-71-72-75-76-77-83-84-85-90-91). Marked is the interval of the LPC amplitude analysis.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.148 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jan 12, 2021
|
Published on: Mar 10, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Matias Bertonatti, Mathias Weymar, Werner Sommer, Martin H. Fischer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.