References
- 1Aravena, S., Snellings, P., Tijms, J., & van der Molen, M. W. (2013). A lab-controlled simulation of a letter–speech sound binding deficit in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(4), 691–707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.03.009
- 2Aravena, S., Tijms, J., Snellings, P., & van der Molen, M. W. (2017). Predicting Individual Differences in Reading and Spelling Skill With Artificial Script–Based Letter–Speech Sound Training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 0022219417715407. DOI: 10.1177/0022219417715407
- 3Bishop, C. H. (1964). Transfer effects of word and letter training in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 3(3), 215. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(64)80044-X
- 4Bitan, T., & Karni, A. (2003). Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 323–337. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00301-4
- 5Byrne, B. (1984). On teaching articulatory phonetics via an orthography. Memory & Cognition, 12(2), 181–189. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198432
- 6Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90003-E
- 7Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. DOI: 10.1177/1529100618772271
- 8Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and reading in 4th–10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 884. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000026
- 9García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. DOI: 10.3102/0034654313499616
- 10Hulme, C., Goetz, K., Gooch, D., Adams, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2007). Paired-associate learning, phoneme awareness, and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(2), 150–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.09.002
- 11Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150
- 12Law, J. M., De Vos, A., Vanderauwera, J., Wouters, J., Ghesquière, P., & Vandermosten, M. (2018). Grapheme-Phoneme Learning in an unknown orthography: A study in typical reading and dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01393
- 13Litt, R. A., de Jong, P. F., van Bergen, E., & Nation, K. (2013). Dissociating crossmodal and verbal demands in paired associate learning (PAL): What drives the PAL–reading relationship? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 137–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.012
- 14Litt, R. A., Wang, H.-C., Sailah, J., Badcock, N. A., & Castles, A. (2018). Paired associate learning deficits in poor readers: The contribution of phonological input and output processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1747021818762669. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818762669
- 15Litt, R. A., & Nation, K. (2014). The nature and specificity of paired associate learning deficits in children with dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 71–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.005
- 16Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015).
JASP (Version 0.7)[computer software] . Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Jasp project. - 17Maurer, U., Blau, V. C., Yoncheva, Y. N., & McCandliss, B. D. (2010). Development of visual expertise for reading: rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script. Developmental neuropsychology, 35(4), 404–422. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.480916
- 18Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2010). SLRT-II: Lese- und Rechtschreibtest; Weiterentwicklyng des Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtests (SLRT): Huber.
- 19Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2014). Package “BayesFactor”. Retrieved from
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/BayesFactor.pdf - 20Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
- 21Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly (pp. 29–53). DOI: 10.2307/747832
- 22Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 520–529. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520
- 23Schmalz, X., Moll, K., Mulatti, C., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Is statistical learning related to reading ability, and if so, why? Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), 64–76. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1482304
- 24Schmalz, X., Mulatti, C., Moll, K., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2019). Effects of complexity and unpredictability on the learning of an artificial orthography. In-principle accepted Stage 1 Registered Report at Cortex.
https://osf.io/k4sg9/ - 25Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
- 26Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616658637
- 27Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
- 28Taylor, J. S. H., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2017). Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(6), 826. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000301
- 29Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(1), 60–76. DOI: 10.1037/a0020126
- 30Van den Broeck, W., & Geudens, A. (2012). Old and new ways to study characteristics of reading disability: The case of the nonword-reading deficit. Cognitive Psychology, 65(3), 414–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.06.003
- 31Vidal, C., Content, A., & Chetail, F. (2017). BACS: The Brussels Artificial Character Sets for studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 2093–2112. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8
- 32Wang, H. C., Wass, M., & Castles, A. (2016). Paired-Associate Learning Ability Accounts for Unique Variance in Orthographic Learning. Scientific Studies of Reading (pp. 471–482). DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2016.1231686
- 33Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied psycholinguistics, 14(1), 1–33. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716400010122
- 34Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 502–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
- 35Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
- 36Yoncheva, Y. N., Blau, V. C., Maurer, U., & McCandliss, B. D. (2010). Attentional focus during learning impacts N170 ERP responses to an artificial script. Developmental neuropsychology, 35(4), 423–445. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.480918