Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Cover

Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition?

By: Jeffrey Rouder and  Julia M. Haaf  
Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. Aitkin, M. (1991). Posterior Bayes factors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(1), 111142. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2345730. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01812.x
  2. Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18(8), 706712. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
  3. Blumenthal, T. D., & Berg, W. K. (1986). Stimulus rise time, intensity, and bandwidth effects on acoustic startle amplitude and probability. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 635641. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00682.x
  4. Bosker, H. R. (2018). Putting laurel and yanny in context. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(6), EL503EL508. DOI: 10.1121/1.5070144
  5. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
  6. Coren, S. (1993). The left-hander syndrome: The causes and consequences of left-handedness. New York: The Free Press.
  7. Davis, M. (2006). Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle. American Psychologist, 61(8), 741. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.741
  8. Davis-Stober, C. P., & Brown, N. (2011). A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), 800813.
  9. Davis-Stober, C. P., Dana, J., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). Estimation accuracy in the psychological sciences. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0207239. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207239
  10. Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1977). Stein’s paradox in statistics. Scientific American, 236, 119127. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0577-119
  11. Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F. M., & Lee, T.-M. (1992). Bayesian analysis of constrained parameter and truncated data problems using Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(418), 523532. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290286. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10475235
  12. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd edition). London: Chapman; Hall. DOI: 10.1201/9780429258480
  13. Haaf, J. M., Klaassen, F., & Rouder, J. N. (2019). Capturing ordinal theoretical constraint in psychological science. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/a4xu9/. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/a4xu9
  14. Haaf, J. M., & Rouder, J. N. (2017). Developing constraint in Bayesian mixed models. Psychological Methods, 22(4), 779798. DOI: 10.1037/met0000156
  15. Haaf, J. M., & Rouder, J. N. (2019). Some do and some don’t? Accounting for variability of individual difference structures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26, 772789. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1522-x
  16. Hoijtink, H., Klugkist, I., & Boelen, P. (2008). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4
  17. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 283293. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.283
  18. Klugkist, I., & Hoijtink, H. (2007). The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(12), 63676379. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.01.024
  19. Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 477. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.477
  20. Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573603. DOI: 10.1037/a0029146
  21. MacLeod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
  22. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
  23. Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2014). Initial judgment task and delay of the final validity-rating task moderate the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 23, 7484. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.002
  24. Neisser. (1967). Cognitive psychology (Classic Edition). Psychology Press/Meredith Publishing Company.
  25. Regenwetter, M., Grofman, B., Popova, A., Messner, W., Davis-Stober, C. P., & Cavagnaro, D. R. (2008). Behavioural social choice: A status report. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1518), 833843. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0259
  26. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275289. DOI: 10.1037/h0027768
  27. Resnik, M. D. (1987). Choices: An introduction to decision theory. U of Minnesota Press.
  28. Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450
  29. Rouder, J., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(2), 452467. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
  30. Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., Davis-Stober, C. P., & Hilgard, J. (2019a). Beyond overall effects: A Bayesian approach to finding constraints in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods. DOI: 10.1037/met0000216
  31. Rouder, J. N., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2019b). Why most studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks are bound to fail. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/3cjr5/download?format=pdf. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5
  32. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). The interplay between subjectivity, statistical practice, and psychological science. Collabra, 2, 6. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.28
  33. Rouder, J. N., Yue, Y., Speckman, P. L., Pratte, M. S., & Province, J. M. (2010). Gradual growth vs. Shape invariance in perceptual decision making. Psychological Review, 117, 12671274. DOI: 10.1037/a0020793
  34. Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99118. DOI: 10.1037/h0036117
  35. Schnuerch, M., Nadarevic, L., & Rouder, J. N. (2020). The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect.
  36. Silvapulle, M. J., & Sen, P. K. (2011). Constrained statistical inference: Order, inequality, and shape constraints (Vol. 912). John Wiley & Sons.
  37. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 583639. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
  38. Thiele, J. E., Haaf, J. M., & Rouder, J. N. (2017). Bayesian analysis for systems factorial technology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 4054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.002
  39. Vanpaemel, W. (2010). Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the Bayes factor. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 491498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.07.003
  40. Vanpaemel, W., & Lee, M. D. (2012). Using priors to formalize theory: Optimal attention and the generalized context model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 10471056. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0300-4
  41. Von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2015). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246258. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000120
  42. Wallisch, P. (2017). Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain: “The dress”. Journal of Vision, 17(4), 55. DOI: 10.1167/17.4.5
  43. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441517. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.131 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2019
|
Accepted on: Sep 23, 2020
|
Published on: Aug 27, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Jeffrey Rouder, Julia M. Haaf, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.