References
- Albarracín, D., & Handley, I. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 983–998. DOI: 10.1037/a0023245
- Barrera, O., Guriev, S., Henry, E., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2020). Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics, 182,
104123 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104123 - Betsch, C., Schmid, P., Heinemeier, D., Korn, L., Holtmann, C., & Böhm, R. (2018). Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS ONE, 13(12). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208601
- Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
- Boudana, S. (2016). Impartiality is not fair: Toward an alternative approach to the evaluation of content bias in news stories. Journalism, 17(5), 600–618. DOI: 10.1177/1464884915571295
- Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
- Clarke, C. E. (2008). A question of balance: The autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American elite press. Science Communication, 30(1), 77–107. DOI: 10.1177/1075547008320262
- Clarke, C. E., Dixon, G. N., Holton, A., & McKeever, B. W. (2015). Including “Evidentiary Balance” in News Media Coverage of Vaccine Risk. Health Communication, 30(5), 461–472. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.867006
- Clarke, C. E., McKeever, B. W., Holton, A., & Dixon, G. N. (2015). The Influence of Weight-of-Evidence Messages on (Vaccine) Attitudes: A Sequential Mediation Model. Journal of Health Communication, 20(11), 1302–1309. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1023959
- Cohen, J. (1977).
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences . Academic Press. DOI: 10.2307/2529115 - Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315–346. DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
- Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS ONE, 12(5),
e0175799 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 - Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., … Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
- Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (Un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129–151. DOI: 10.1177/1075547004270234
- Dearing, J. W. (1995). Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing. Public Understanding of Science, 4(4), 341–361. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/4/4/002
- Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009, October 16).
Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn139 - Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Education Research, 28(2), 352–359. Retrieved from
https://academic.oup.com/her/article-abstract/28/2/352/595490 . DOI: 10.1093/her/cys110 - Dunwoody, S. (2005). Weight-of-Evidence Reporting: What Is It? Why Use It? Nieman Reports, 59(4), 89–91. Retrieved from
https://niemanreports.org/articles/weight-of-evidence-reporting-what-is-it-why-use-it/ - Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 39–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002
- Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1987). Information utility and the multiple source effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Retrieved from
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-15547-001 . DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.260 - Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2017). Attitude roots and jiu jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. American Psychologist, 72(5), 459–473. DOI: 10.1037/a0040437
- Koehler, D. (2016). Can Journalistic “False Balance” Distort Public Perception of Consensus in Expert Opinion? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 22(1), 24–38. Retrieved from
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-00600-001 . DOI: 10.1037/xap0000073 - Kohl, P. A., Kim, S. Y., Peng, Y., Akin, H., Koh, E. J., Howell, A., & Dunwoody, S. (2016). The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science. Public Understanding of Science, 25(8), 976–991. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515615087
- Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PL100201
- Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2012). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 399–404. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1720
- Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated Rejection of Science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217–222. DOI: 10.1177/0963721416654436
- Livingstone, S. M., & Lunt, P. K. (1994). Talk on television: audience participation and public debate (1st ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203131916
- McDonald, R. I., & Crandall, C. S. (2015). ScienceDirectSocial norms and social influence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 1–5. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154615000558 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.006 - McGuire, W. J. (1961a). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 326–332. DOI: 10.1037/h0048344
- McGuire, W. J. (1961b). The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion. Sociometry, 24(2), 184. DOI: 10.2307/2786067
- McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of Forewarning in Developing Resistance to Persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(1), 24. DOI: 10.1086/267068
- Mooney, B. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2005). Undoing Darwin. Columbia Journalism Review, 44(3), 30–39. Retrieved from
http://www.academia.edu/download/30499477/cjr_september_october_2005_-_undoing_darwin.pdf - Mummolo, J., & Peterson, E. (2019). Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 517–529. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055418000837
- Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. J. (2019). Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behavior, 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
- Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (in press). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention. Psychological Science.
- Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., & Westerling, A. L. (2019). Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3502. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09959-4
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986).
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion . In Communication and Persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 - Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Retrieved from
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1981-32766-001 . DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.81 - Pew Research Center. (2009). Scientific Achievements Less Prominent Than a Decade Ago: Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. Retrieved from
https://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-5-evolution-climate-change-and-other-issues/ - Pew Research Center. (2015). Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society. Retrieved from
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/ - Quinn, J. M., & Wood, W. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analysis syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119–138. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.119
- Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1)(12). Retrieved from
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-019-0279-9 . DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9 - Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (1997). Viewing television talk shows. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 14(1), 106–115. DOI: 10.1080/08824099709388651
- Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2019). Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nature Human Behaviour. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4
- Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M., & Betsch, C. (2019). Material and Data: Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Science Denialism in Public Discussions. Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SEFQU.
- Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170. DOI: 10.1177/146488490100200201
- van der Linden, S., Clarke, C. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1207. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4
- Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423–441. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
- Wood, W. (2000). Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 539–570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
- World Health Organization. (2016). Best practice guidance: How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Retrieved from
http://www.euro.who.int/de/health-topics/disease-prevention/vaccines-and-immunization/publications/2016/best-practice-guidance-how-to-respond-to-vocal-vaccine-deniers-in-public-2016 - Zizzo, D. J. (2010). Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 13(1), 75–98. DOI: 10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z