Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions

Philipp Schmid; Marius Schwarzer; Cornelia Betsch

doi:10.5334/joc.125

Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions

Journal of Cognition

Volume 3 (2020): Issue 1

By: Philipp Schmid , Marius Schwarzer and Cornelia Betsch

Open Access

|Oct 2020

Authors

Philipp Schmid

philipp.schmid@uni-erfurt.de

CEREB – Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt; Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt

Marius Schwarzer

marius.schwarzer@uni-erfurt.de

Department of Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt

Cornelia Betsch

cornelia.betsch@uni-erfurt.de

CEREB – Center of Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt; Department of Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.125 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Submitted on: Dec 10, 2019

Accepted on: Sep 8, 2020

Published on: Oct 1, 2020

Published by: Ubiquity Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

false-balance effect,

science denialism,

forewarning,

multiple-source effect,

rebuttal,

weight of evidence,

vaccination

© 2020 Philipp Schmid, Marius Schwarzer, Cornelia Betsch, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 3 (2020): Issue 1 Next article