References
- Abner, N., Cooperrider, K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Gesture for Linguists: A Handy Primer. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(11), 437–449. DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12168
- Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 593–613. DOI: 10.1080/016909600750040571
- Alibali, M. W., Mitchell, N., & Fujimori, Y. (2011).
Gesture in the mathematics classroom: What’s the point? In N. L. Stein & S. W. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental Cognitive Science Goes to School (pp. 219–234). Routledge. - Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
- Bangerter, A. (2004). Using Pointing and Describing to Achieve Joint Focus of Attention in Dialogue. Psychological Science, 15(6), 415–419. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00694.x
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
- Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. S. (1976). Two Faces of Sign: Iconic and Abstract*. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 514–538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25514.x
- Bohn, M., & Frank, M. C. (2019). The Pervasive Role of Pragmatics in Early Language. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 223–249. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-085037
- Bohn, M., & Köymen, B. (2018). Common Ground and Development. Child Development Perspectives, 12(2), 104–108. DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12269
- Boyes-Braem, P. (1981). Features of the handshape in American Sign Language [Ph.D.]. Berkeley: University of California.
- Boyes-Braem, P. (1986).
Two aspects of pyscholinguistic research: Iconicity and temporal structure . In B. T. Tervoort (Ed.), Signs of life: Proceedings of the second european congress on sign language research (Vol. 50, pp. 65–74). Publication of the Institute for General Linguistics, University of Amsterdam. - Brennan, M. (1991).
Making borrowings work in British Sign Language . In D. Brentari (Ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: Cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, Sign (pp. 49–86). Lawrence Erlbaum. - Brennan, M. (1992).
The visual world of British Sign Language: An introduction . In D. Brien (Ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. Faber and Faber. - Brentari, D. (2012).
Phonology . In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110261325.21 - Cai, Z., & Vigliocco, G. (2018).
Word Processing . In J. T. Wixted & S. L. Thompson-Schill (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience: Vols 3. Language and Thought (4th ed.). DOI: 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn303 - Cartmill, E. a, Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(28), 11278–83. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309518110
- Caselli, N. K., & Pyers, J. E. (2019). Degree and not type of iconicity affects sign language vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000713
- Chandrasekaran, C., Trubanova, A., Stillittano, S., Caplier, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech. PLOS Computational Biology, 5(7),
e1000436 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000436 - Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 146, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004
- Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
- Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a Method of Communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000026
- Cocks, N., Byrne, S., Pritchard, M., Morgan, G., & Dipper, L. (2018). Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 584–591. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12372
- Cooperrider, K. (2016). The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures. Discourse Processes, 53(8), 632–656. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2015.1094280
- Cormier, K., Fenlon, J., & Schembri, A. (2015). Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics, 1, 684–707. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0025
- Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Donselaar, W. van. (1997). Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review: Language and Speech, 40(2). DOI: 10.1177/002383099704000203
- Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 385–400. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90033-1
- Cuxac, C. (2003). Langue et langage: Un apport critique de la langue des signes française. Langue française, 137(1), 12–31. DOI: 10.3406/lfr.2003.1054
- De Ruiter, L. E., Theakston, A. L., Brandt, S., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2018). Iconicity affects children’s comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences. Cognition, 171(March 2017), 202–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.015
- de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
- D’Entremont, B. (2000). A perceptual–attentional explanation of gaze following in 3- and 6-month-olds. Developmental Science, 3(3), 302–311. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00124
- Diessel, H. (2008). Iconicity of sequence: A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 465–490. DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2008.018
- Dingemanse, M. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 4. DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.444
- Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
- Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S., & Mitterer, H. (2016). What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language, 92(2), e117–e133. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0034
- Drijvers, L., & Özyürek, A. (2017). Visual Context Enhanced: The Joint Contribution of Iconic Gestures and Visible Speech to Degraded Speech Comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 212–222. DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0101
- Emmorey, K. (2014). Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130301. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0301
- Emmorey, K., & Herzig, M. (2003).
Categorical Versus Gradient Properties of Classifier Constructions in ASL . In K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (pp. 221–246). Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9781410607447 - Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S. (2013). How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–67. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12048
- Fontana, S. (2008). Mouth actions as gesture in sign language [Text].
https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1075/gest.8.1.08fon - Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and Iconicity: Historical Change in American Sign Language. Language, 51(3), 696–719. DOI: 10.2307/412894
- Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. DOI: 10.1080/03640210701703659
- Gasser, M. (2004). The origins of arbitrariness in language. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 4–7.
- Goodrich, W., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2009). Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 81–87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00735.x
- Grice, H. P. (1975).
Logic and conversation . In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1163/9789004368811_003 - Hadar, U., & Butterworth, B. (2009). Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica, 115(1–2), 147–172. DOI: 10.1515/semi.1997.115.1-2.147
- Hasson, U., Egidi, G., Marelli, M., & Willems, R. M. (2018). Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension. Cognition, 180, 135–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018
- Herold, D. S., Nygaard, L. C., Chicos, K. A., & Namy, L. L. (2011). The developing role of prosody in novel word interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 229–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.005
- Herold, D. S., Nygaard, L. C., & Namy, L. L. (2011). Say It Like You Mean It: Mothers’ Use of Prosody to Convey Word Meaning: Language and Speech. DOI: 10.1177/0023830911422212
- Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–96. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
- Hofsten, C. von, Dahlström, E., & Fredriksson, Y. (2005). 12-Month-Old Infants’ Perception of Attention Direction in Static Video Images. Infancy, 8(3), 217–231. DOI: 10.1207/s15327078in0803_2
- Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2007). The Role of Iconic Gestures in Speech Disambiguation: ERP Evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(7), 1175–1192. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1175
- Holle, H., Obleser, J., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., & Gunter, T. C. (2010). Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. NeuroImage, 49(1), 875–884. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.058
- Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
- Holler, J., Schubotz, L., Kelly, S., Hagoort, P., Schuetze, M., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture. Cognition, 133(3), 692–697. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.008
- Holzrichter, A. S., & Meier, R. P. (2000).
Child-directed signing in American Sign Language . In Language acquisition by eye (pp. 25–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. - Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130298.#8211;. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
- Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109(1), 54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015
- Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Longobardi, E., & Caselli, M. C. (1999). Gesture in mother-child interactions. Cognitive Development, 14, 57–75. DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80018-5
- Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2007). What do English Speakers Know about gera-gera and yota-yota?: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Mimetic Words for Laughing and Walking. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe, 17(6), 53–78.
- Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. C. (1999). On Defining Lexeme in a Signed Language. Sign Language & Linguistics, 2(2), 115–185. DOI: 10.1075/sll.2.2.03joh
- Kelly, S., Healey, M., Özyürek, A., & Holler, J. (2015). The processing of speech, gesture, and action during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 517–523. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0681-7
- Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
- Kendon, A. (2008). Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture, 8(3), 348–366. DOI: 10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken
- Kendon, A. (2012). Language and kinesic complexity: Reflections on “Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language” by Wendy Sandler. Gesture, 12(3), 308–326. DOI: 10.1075/gest.12.3.02ken
- Kendon, A. (2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130293. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
- Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124(3), 245–266. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000059
- Kita, S., Özyürek, A., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Relations between syntactic encoding and co-speech gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(8), 1212–1236. DOI: 10.1080/01690960701461426
- Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Harvard University Press.
- Knoeferle, K., Li, J., Maggioni, E., & Spence, C. (2017). What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Nature, 7(1), 5562. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05965-y
- Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. Liveright.
- Laing, C. E. (2014). A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language, 34(5), 387–405. DOI: 10.1177/0142723714550110
- Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130302. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0302
- Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
- Little, H., Eryılmaz, K., & de Boer, B. (2017). Signal dimensionality and the emergence of combinatorial structure. Cognition, 168, 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.011
- Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(8), 1274–1281. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000235
- Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170137. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0137
- Marchand, H. (1959). Phonetic symbolism in English word-formation. Indogermanische Forschungen, 64, 256–277. DOI: 10.1515/9783110243062.256
- Mcgurk, H., & Macdonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746–748. DOI: 10.1038/264746a0
- McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
- Meteyard, L., Stoppard, E., Snudden, D., Cappa, S. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). When semantics aids phonology: A processing advantage for iconic word forms in aphasia—ScienceDirect. Neuropsychologia, 76, 264–275. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.042
- Meteyard, L., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Lexico-Semantics. The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.4
- Mohr, S. (2014). Mouth Actions in Sign Languages: An empirical study of Irish Sign Language. De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9781614514978
- Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
- Motamedi, Y., Murgiano, M., Perniss, P., Grzyb, B., Brieke, R., Gu, Y., Marshall, C. R., Wonnacott, E., & Vigliocco, G. (2020). There is much more than just words in caregivers’ communication to children. Manuscript in preparation.
- Mumford, K. H., & Kita, S. (2014). Children Use Gesture to Interpret Novel Verb Meanings. Child Development, 85(3), 1181–1189. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12188
- Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(1), 37–57. DOI: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_3
- Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S., & Namy, L. L. (2009). The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 127–146. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x
- Oda, H. (2000). An embodied semantic mechanism for mimetic words in Japanese [Ph.D., Indiana University].
https://search.proquest.com/docview/304600174/abstract/65B694AB3D32419BPQ/1 - O’Neill, M., Bard, K. A., Linnell, M., & Fluck, M. (2005). Maternal gestures with 20-month-old infants in two contexts. Developmental Science, 8(4), 352–359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00423.x
- Ortega, G. (2017). Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280
- Peeters, D., & Özyürek, A. (2016). This and That Revisited: A Social and Multimodal Approach to Spatial Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00222
- Peirce, C. S. (1974). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce. Harvard University Press.
- Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8), 150152. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150152
- Perniss, P. (2018). Why We Should Study Multimodal Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(June), 1–5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109
- Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). Mapping language to the world: The role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, July 2015, 1–23. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12551
- Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(DEC), 1–15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
- Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0300
- Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in english and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–17. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137147
- Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., Winter, B., Massaro, D. W., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Iconicity in the speech of children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(3), 1–8. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12572
- Pfau, R., & Quer, J. (2010).
Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles . In D. Brentari (Ed.), Sign Languages (pp. 381–402). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 - Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and Arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2(3), 296–321. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2002.0012
- Pizer, G., & Meier, R. P. (2011).
Child-directed signing as a linguistic register . In R. Channon & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Formational units in signed languages (pp. 65–83). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781614510680.65 - Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. MIT Press.
- Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., Rohlfing, K. J., & Deacon, T. W. (2018). Language Development From an Ecological Perspective: Ecologically Valid Ways to Abstract Symbols. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 39–73. DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2017.1410387
- Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia—A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.
- Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, Speech, and Lexical Access: The Role of Lexical Movements in Speech Production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.x
- Roberts, G., Lewandowski, J., & Galantucci, B. (2015). How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition, 141, 52–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001
- Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Differences in Early Gesture Explain SES Disparities in Child Vocabulary Size at School Entry. Science, 323(5916), 951–953. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167025
- Russo, T. (2004). La mappa poggiata sull’isola. Iconicità e metafora nelle lingue dei segni e nelle lingue vocali. Centro Editoriale e Librario Università degli Studi della Calabria.
- Sallandre, M.-A., & Cuxac, C. (2001). Iconicity in sign language: A theoretical and methodological point of view. Proceedings of the International Gesture Workshop, 171–180.
- Sandler, W. (1999). The Medium and the Message: Prosodic Interpretation of Linguistic Content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics, 2(2), 187–215. DOI: 10.1075/sll.2.2.04san
- Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
- Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals. Current Biology, 18(9), 668–671. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.059
- Shintel, H., Anderson, N. L., & Fenn, K. M. (2014). Talk This Way: The Effect of Prosodically Conveyed Semantic Information on Memory for Novel Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(4), 1437–1442. DOI: 10.1037/a0036605
- Shintel, H., Nusbaum, H. C., & Okrent, A. (2006). Analog acoustic expression in speech communication. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 167–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.002
- Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Lonely sensational icons: Semantic neighbourhood density, sensory experience and iconicity. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(1), 25–31. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1358379
- Sidhu, D. M., Vigliocco, G., & Pexman, P. M. (2020). Effects of iconicity in lexical decision. Language and Cognition, 12, 1–18. DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2019.36
- Slobin, D. I. (2008). Breaking the Molds: Signed Languages and the Nature of Human Language. Sign Language Studies, 8(2), 114–130. DOI: 10.1353/sls.2008.0004
- Snedeker, J., & Gleitman, L. R. (2004).
Why It Is Hard to Label Our Concepts . In Weaving a lexicon (pp. 257–293). MIT Press. - Staudte, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2011). Investigating joint attention mechanisms through spoken human–robot interaction. Cognition, 120(2), 268–291. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.005
- Stec, K., Huiskes, M., & Redeker, G. (2016). Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.008
- Strickland, B., Geraci, C., Chemla, E., Schlenker, P., Kelepir, M., & Pfau, R. (2015). Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 21, 1–6. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423080112
- Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632–1634. DOI: 10.1126/science.7777863
- Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 929–938. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.929
- Theisen, C. A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S. (2010). Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32. DOI: 10.1075/is.11.1.08the
- Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). The link between form and meaning in British sign language: Effects of iconicity for phonological decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 1017–1027. DOI: 10.1037/a0019339
- Tolar, T. D., Lederberg, A. R., Gokhale, S., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(2), 225–240. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enm045
- Tomasello, M. (2008). The Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
- Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. (1994). Learning Words in Nonostensive Contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 639–650. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.639
- Tomasello, M., & Kruger, A. C. (1992). Joint attention on actions: Acquiring verbs in ostensive and non-ostensive contexts*. Journal of Child Language, 19(2), 311–333. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900011430
- Tomasello, M., Strosberg, R., & Akhtar, N. (1996). Eighteen-month-old children learn words in non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language, 23(1), 157–176. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900010138
- Vigliocco, G., & Kita, S. (2006). Language-specific properties of the lexicon: Implications for learning and processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 790–816. DOI: 10.1080/016909600824070
- Vigliocco, G., Motamedi, Y., Murgiano, M., Wonnacott, E., Marshall, C. R., Milan Maillo, I., & Perniss, P. (2019). Onomatopoeias, gestures, actions and words in the input to children: How do caregivers use multimodal cues in their communication to children? Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/v263k
- Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130292. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0292
- Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1079–1087. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1079
- Vinson, D., Thompson, R. L., Skinner, R., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 56–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.002
- Wilbur, R. B. (2004).
Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In J. Quer (Ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004. Signum Press. - Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Which words are most iconic? Interaction Studies, 18(3), 430–451. DOI: 10.1075/is.18.3.07win
- Woll, B. (2014). Moving from hand to mouth: Echo phonology and the origins of language. Name: Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00662
- Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015–1027. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7
- Zhang, Y., Frassinelli, D., Tuomainen, J., Skipper, J. I., & Vigliocco, G. (2019). More than words: The online orchestration of word predictability, prosody, gesture, and mouth movements during natural language comprehension. Manuscript Submitted for Publication. DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.08.896712