Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Building an Integrated Database of North-Eastern African Archaeological and Heritage Sites for Mapping Complex Social Landscapes Cover

Building an Integrated Database of North-Eastern African Archaeological and Heritage Sites for Mapping Complex Social Landscapes

Open Access
|Apr 2023
Read online

Figures & tables

Figure 1

Map of the Marmarica region displaying the sites documented during the project.

Figure 2

Kernel density shows a high cluster of archaeological and heritage sites mostly along the coast and inland oases.

Table 1

Chronological scheme.

TEMPORALITIESCULTURAL PERIODDATE
Late Bronze AgeNew Kingdom15th – 11th BC
Early Iron AgeThird Intermediate period11th – 7th BC
Archaic (Iron Age)
ClassicalLate period7th – 4rd BC
HellenisticPtolemaic period4rd – 1st BC
RomanRoman period1st BC – 3rd AD
Late RomanLate Roman period3rd – 7th AD
Table 2

Database record structure.

VARIABLETYPEEXAMPLE
IDstringPE_00002
Zonenumeric2
Modern_NamestringBates’s Island
Old_NamestringUnknown
Coord_xnumeric27.266849
Coord_ynumeric31.361078
AccuracystringHigh
Validationnumeric4
TypestringSettlement
SubtypestringHarbour
Eco_ZonestringCoastal zone and northern tableland
Risk_LevelstringHigh
Cod_Riskstring2, 3, 4
RemainsdichotomousYes
ChronologystringLate Bronze Age, Early Iron Age, Archaic, Classical, Hellenistic, Roman, Late Roman
KeywordsstringMarmarica coast, Marsa Matruh, Shells, Cannanite amphora, Cypriot pottery, Trade, Ships
DescriptionstringIsland settlement. Crete, which lies ca. 420 km northwest of Matruh, was perhaps the final point west for eastern Mediterranean traders
Biblio_refstring(White, D. 1986: 51–84)
Figure 3

Conceptual model of data collection, validation, and dissemination process.

Figure 4

Digitisation process of the Mersa Matruh area (NW-Egypt) based on the cross-checking of different sources. (A) Satellite imagery showing changes to its coastline and present-day urban expansion; (B) Historical aerial photograph from 1938 taken by the Royal Air Force (RAF) (© UCL Institute of Archaeology); (C) Topographic map from 1955, US Army Map Service (P502, Sheet NH 35–3 Matruh); (D) Spatial distribution of digitised sites by the project covering the entire area (Basemap: © ESRI).

Figure 5

Validation scale with fields of accurate of digitized sites and level of confidence of sources.

Figure 6

Examples of archaeological sites according to their closeness degree based on observed evidence, and the level of confidence provided by the sources.

Figure 7

Chart displaying the relationship between accuracy and validation of the documented sites.

Figure 8

PERAIA web service providing access to the database for direct query and downloading in CSV format, and visualisation of the interactive map.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joad.99 | Journal eISSN: 2049-1565
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Published on: Apr 25, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 David Laguna-Palma, Maurizio Toscano, Carlos Rodríguez-Rellán, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.