References
- 1Antares Audio Technologies. 2025. Auto-Tune. Available at:
https://www.antarestech.com/ [Last accessed 17 January 2025]. - 2Bearman, M and Ajjawi, R. 2023. ‘Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5): 1160–1173. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13337
- 3Bucher, T. 2016.
‘Neither black nor box: Ways of knowing algorithms’ . In: Kubitschko, S and Kaun, A (eds.) Innovative methods in media and communication research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 81–98. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5_5 - 4Celemony. 2025. What is melodyne?
https://www.celemony.com/en/melodyne/what-is-melodyne (Last accessed 17 January 2025). - 5Cormier, D. 20 January 2023. ‘ChatGPT search – Autotune for knowledge’. Dave’s Educational Blog. Available at:
https://davecormier.com/edblog/2023/01/20/chatgpt-search-autotune-for-knowledge/ (Last accessed 17 January 2025). - 6Costello, E. 2024. ‘ChatGPT and the educational AI chatter: Full of bullshit or trying to tell us something?’ Postdigital Science and Education, 6(2): 425–430. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-023-00398-5
- 7Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.
- 8Diaz, J. 2009. The fate of Auto-Tune. Available at:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/music-and-theater-arts/21m-380-music-and-technology-contemporary-history-and-aesthetics-fall-2009/projects/MIT21M_380F09_proj_mtech_3.pdf (Last accessed 17 January 2025). - 9Ferreira, GMDS, Lemgruber, MS and Cabrera, TL. 2023. ‘From didachography to AI: Metaphors teaching is automated by’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2023(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/jime.798
- 10Jin, F, Sun, L, Pan, Y and Lin, CH. 2025. ‘High heels, compass, Spider-Man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing’. Computers & Education, 105248. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248
- 11Lakoff, G. 1993.
‘The contemporary theory of metaphor’ . In: Ortony, A (ed.) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 202–251. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 - 12Lodge, JM, Yang, S, Furze, L and Dawson, P. 2023. ‘It’s not like a calculator, so what is the relationship between learners and generative artificial intelligence?’ Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2): 117–124. DOI: 10.1080/23735082.2023.2261106
- 13Looi, CK. 2024. ‘Charting the uncertain future of AI and education: Promises, challenges and opportunities’. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 19(3): 477–486. DOI: 10.1080/1554480X.2024.2379776
- 14Maxwell, JA. 2013. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
- 15McGowan, M. 2012. Auto-tune’s effect on musicians, genres, and culture. Thesis (PhD), Carleton University.
- 16Provenzano, C. 2019. Emotional signals: Digital tuning software and the meanings of pop music voices. Thesis (PhD), New York University.
- 17Schön, DA. 1993.
‘Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy’ . In: Ortony, A (ed.) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 137–163. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011 - 18Tai, J, Ajjawi, R, Boud, D, Dawson, P and Panadero, E. 2018. ‘Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work’. Higher education, 76: 467–481. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
- 19Warner, J. 2025. More than words – How to think about writing in the age of AI. New York: Basic Books.
- 20Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.