Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fear and Awe: Making Sense of Generative AI Through Metaphor Cover

Fear and Awe: Making Sense of Generative AI Through Metaphor

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2025 (2025): Issue 1
By: Carmen Vallis,  Stephanie Wilson and  Alison Casey  
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. 1Anderson, SS. 2023. ‘“Places to stand”: Multiple metaphors for framing ChatGPT’s corpus’. Computers and Composition, 68: 102778. DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102778
    Back to article
  2. 2Bailey, R. 2024. ‘Educational technology, higher education discourses and the lived experience of lecturers as users: Exploring the metaphors’. Metaphor and the Social World, 14(2): 215–232. DOI: 10.1075/msw.24009.bai
    Back to article
  3. 3Baria, AT and Cross, K. 2021. ‘The brain is a computer is a brain: Neuroscience’s internal debate and the social significance of the Computational Metaphor’. ArXiv.Org.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bayne, S. 2015. ‘Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching’. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4): 455–467. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783
    Back to article
  5. 5Bearman, M and Ajjawi, R. 2023. ‘Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5): 1160–1173. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13337
    Back to article
  6. 6Bearman, M, Tai, J, Dawson, P, Boud, D and Ajjawi, R. 2024. ‘Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6): 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
    Back to article
  7. 7Bender, EM. 2024. ‘Resisting dehumanization in the age of “AI”’. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 33(2): 114–120. DOI: 10.1177/09637214231217286
    Back to article
  8. 8Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2021. ‘One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?’ Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3): 328–352. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
    Back to article
  9. 9Cameron, L. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London & New York: Continuum.
    Back to article
  10. 10Carbonell, J, Sánchez-Esguevillas, A and Carro, B. 2016. ‘The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of the artificial intelligence’. Futures, 84: 145–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.019
    Back to article
  11. 11Carvalho, L, Martinez-Maldonado, R, Tsai, Y-S, Markauskaite, L and De Laat, M. 2022. ‘How can we design for learning in an AI world?’ Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100053
    Back to article
  12. 12Coello, CEA, Alimam, MN and Kouatly, R. 2024. ‘Effectiveness of ChatGPT in coding: A comparative analysis of popular large language models’. Digital, 4(1): 114–125. DOI: 10.3390/digital4010005
    Back to article
  13. 13Cortazzi, M and Jin, L. 2020. ‘Elicited metaphor analysis: Researching teaching and learning’. In: Ward, MRM and Delamont, S (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research in education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 488–505. DOI: 10.4337/9781788977159.00054
    Back to article
  14. 14Costello, E. 2023. ‘ChatGPT and the educational AI chatter: Full of bullshit or trying to tell us something?’ Postdigital Science and Education, 6: 425–430. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-023-00398-5
    Back to article
  15. 15Costello, E, Welsh, S, Girme, P, Concannon, F, Farrelly, T and Thompson, C. 2023. ‘Who cares about learning design? Near future superheroes and villains of an educational ethics of care’. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(3): 460–475. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2022.2074452
    Back to article
  16. 16Cox, A, Cameron, D, Checco, A, Herrick, T, Mawson, M and Steadman-Jones, R. 2023. ‘Criteria of quality in fiction-based research to promote debate about the use of AI and robots in Higher Education’. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(3): 559–573. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2087603
    Back to article
  17. 17Davidson, D. 2001. Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/0198237537.003.0002
    Back to article
  18. 18Dawson, P. 2020. ‘Cognitive offloading and assessment’. In: Bearman, M, Dawson, P, Ajjawi, R, Tai, J and Boud, D (eds.) Re-imagining university assessment in a digital world. Cham: Springer. pp. 37–48. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_4
    Back to article
  19. 19Derakhshan, A and Ghiasvand, F. 2024. ‘Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research-active EFL teachers’ perceptions’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34: 1246–1264. DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12561
    Back to article
  20. 20Ding, A-CE, Shi, L, Yang, H and Choi, I. 2024. ‘Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development’. Computers and Education Open, 6: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178
    Back to article
  21. 21Dishon, G. 2024. ‘From monsters to mazes: Sociotechnical imaginaries of AI between Frankenstein and Kafka’. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3): 962–977. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-024-00482-4
    Back to article
  22. 22Fraser, RE. 2018. ‘The ethics of metaphor’. Ethics, 128(4): 728–755. DOI: 10.1086/697448
    Back to article
  23. 23Gourlay, L. 2024. ‘More-than-digital meaning-making: Paratexts of the postdigital’. Postdigital Science and Education, 6: 756–766. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-023-00449-x
    Back to article
  24. 24Grisoni, L and Page, M. 2010. ‘Two to the power of three: An exploration of metaphor for sense making in (women’s) collaborative inquiry’. Organization Management Journal, 7(1): 13–25. DOI: 10.1057/omj.2010.8
    Back to article
  25. 25Gupta, A, Atef, Y, Mills, A and Bali, M. 2024. ‘Assistant parrot or colonizing loudspeaker? ChatGPT metaphors for developing critical AI literacies’. Open Praxis, 16(1): 37–53. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.631
    Back to article
  26. 26Habib, S, Vogel, T, Anli, X and Thorne, E. 2024. ‘How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?’ Journal of Creativity, 34(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
    Back to article
  27. 27Houlden, S and Veletsianos, G. 2022. ‘Impossible dreaming: On speculative education fiction and hopeful learning futures’. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3): 605–622. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-022-00348-7
    Back to article
  28. 28Jensen, D. 2006. ‘Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1): 36–54. DOI: 10.1177/160940690600500104
    Back to article
  29. 29Jensen, LX, Buhl, A, Sharma, A and Bearman, M. 2024. ‘Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT’. Higher Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3
    Back to article
  30. 30Johnson, DG and Verdicchio, M. 2017. ‘Reframing AI discourse’. Minds and Machines, 27(4): 575–590. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6
    Back to article
  31. 31Kajava, K and Sawhney, N. 2023. ‘Language of algorithms: Agency, metaphors, and deliberations in AI discourses’. In: Lindgren, S (ed.) Handbook of critical studies of artificial intelligence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 224–236. DOI: 10.4337/9781803928562.00025
    Back to article
  32. 32Kizilcec, RF, Huber, E, Papanastasiou, EC, Cram, A, Makridis, CA, Smolansky, A, Zeivots, S and Raduescu, C. 2024. ‘Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States’. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269
    Back to article
  33. 33Krauss, S. 2005. ‘Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer’. The Qualitative Report, 10(4): 758–770. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1831
    Back to article
  34. 34Lakoff, G and Johnson, M. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    Back to article
  35. 35Lodge, JM, Thompson, K and Corrin, L. 2023. ‘Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.8695
    Back to article
  36. 36Lodge, JM, Yang, S, Furze, L and Dawson, P. 2023. ‘It’s not like a calculator, so what is the relationship between learners and generative artificial intelligence?’ Learning, Research and Practice, 9(2): 117–124. DOI: 10.1080/23735082.2023.2261106
    Back to article
  37. 37Markauskaite, L, Marrone, R, Poquet, O, Knight, S, Martinez-Maldonado, R, Howard, S, Tondeur, J, De Laat, M, Buckingham Shum, S, Gašević, D and Siemens, G. 2022. ‘Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI?’ Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3: 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100056
    Back to article
  38. 38McKnight, L and Shipp, C. 2024. ‘“Just a tool”? Troubling language and power in generative AI writing’. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 23(1): 23–35. DOI: 10.1108/ETPC-08-2023-0092
    Back to article
  39. 39Patton, MQ. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    Back to article
  40. 40Punar Özçelik, N and Yangın Ekşi, G. 2024. ‘Cultivating writing skills: The role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study’. Smart Learning Environments, 11(10): 1–18. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
    Back to article
  41. 41Santos Ferreira, GM, Lemgruber, MS and Cabrera, TL. 2023. ‘From didachography to AI: Metaphors teaching is automated by’. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2023(1): 3–3. DOI: 10.5334/jime.798
    Back to article
  42. 42Siemens, G, Marmolejo-Ramos, F, Gabriel, F, Medeiros, K, Marrone, R, Joksimovic, S and De Laat, M. 2022. ‘Human and artificial cognition’. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3:, 100107. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107
    Back to article
  43. 43Tlili, A, Shehata, B, Adarkwah, MA, Bozkurt, A, Hickey, DT, Huang, R and Agyemang, B. 2023. ‘What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education’. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1): 15. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
    Back to article
  44. 44UNESCO. 2023. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. DOI: 10.54675/EWZM9535
    Back to article
  45. 45Vallis, C and Redmond, P. 2021. ‘Introducing design thinking online to large business education courses for twenty-first century learning’. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(6): 213–234. DOI: 10.53761/1.18.6.14
    Back to article
  46. 46Vallis, C, Taleo, W, Wheeler, P, Casey, A, Tucker, S, Luu, J and Zeivots, S. 2023. ‘Collaborative sensemaking with generative AI: A muse, amuse, muse’. ASCILITE Publications: 573–577. DOI: 10.14742/apubs.2023.514
    Back to article
  47. 47Vallis, C, Wilson, S and Casey, A. 2024. ‘Generative AI: Beyond the binaries with metaphors’. ASCILITE Publications: 590–595. DOI: 10.14742/apubs.2024.1408
    Back to article
  48. 48Vallis, C, Wilson, S, Tyrrell, J and Narayan, V. 2022. ‘Co-design as professional learning: Pulling each other in different directions, pulling together’. In: Forbes, D and Walker, R (eds.) Developing online teaching in higher education. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 133–146. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5587-7_10
    Back to article
  49. 49Walter, Y. 2024. ‘Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education’. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1): 15. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
    Back to article
  50. 50Wardak, D, Wilson, S and Zeivots, S. 2024. Co-design as a networked approach to designing educational futures. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1): 194–210. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-023-00425-5
    Back to article
  51. 51Weller, M. 2023. Metaphors of Ed Tech (1st ed.). Athabasca University Press. DOI: 10.15215/aupress/9781771993500.01
    Back to article
  52. 52Wysel, M. 2023. ‘Frenemies – Unleashing the power of ChatGPT in assessments’. In: Cochrane, T, Narayan, V, Brown, C, MacCallum, K, Bone, E, Deneen, C, Vanderburg, R and Hurren, B (eds.) People, partnerships and pedagogies. Proceedings ASCILITE 2023. Christchurch. pp. 614–618. DOI: 10.14742/apubs.2023.653
    Back to article
  53. 53Yan, L, Greiff, S, Teuber, Z and Gašević, D. 2024. ‘Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning’. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10): 1839–1850. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.972 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 12, 2024
Accepted on: May 27, 2025
Published on: Aug 26, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
GenAI,
metaphors,
metaphors in education,
higher education,
qualitative,
sensemaking

© 2025 Carmen Vallis, Stephanie Wilson, Alison Casey, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2025 (2025): Issue 1Next article