References
- 1Ackerman, R and Goldsmith, M. 2011. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1): 18. DOI: 10.1037/a0022086
- 2Allen, M, LeFebvre, L, LeFebvre, L and Bourhis, J. 2020. Is the pencil mightier than the keyboard? A meta-analysis comparing the method of notetaking outcomes. Southern Communication Journal, 85(3): 143–154. DOI: 10.1080/1041794X.2020.1764613
- 3Baron, NS, Calixte, RM and Havewala, M. 2017. The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5): 590–604. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.008
- 4Browne, T, Hewlett, R, Jenkins, M, Voce, J, Walker, R and Yip, H. 2010. 2010 Survey of technology enhanced learning for higher education in the UK. Oxford: UCISA.
http://hdl.handle.net/10036/3009 . - 5CAST. 2018. Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Available at:
http://udlguidelines.cast.org . - 6Dawadi, S, Goshtasbpour, F and Kukulska-Hulme, A. 2024. Equitable access to higher education learning and assessment: Perspectives from low-resource contexts. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (JIME), 2024 Issue, 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.832
- 7Delgado, P, Vargas, C, Ackerman, R and Salmerón, L. 2018. Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25: 23–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
- 8Froud, K, Levinson, L, Maddox, C and Smith, P. 2023. Middle-schoolers’ reading and processing depth in response to digital and print media: An N400 study. bioRxiv. 2023.2008. 2030.553693. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.30.553693
- 9Gourley, P. 2021. Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning. International Review of Economics Education, 37: 100217. DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2021.100217
- 10Henderson, M, Selwyn, N and Aston, R. 2017. What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8): 1567–1579. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
- 11Iniesto, F, McAndrew, P, Minocha, S and Coughlan, T. 2022.
Accessibility in MOOCs: The stakeholders’ perspectives . In: Rienties, B, Hampel, R, Scanlon, E and Whitelock, D (eds.), Open world learning: Research, innovation and the challenges of high-quality education. London: Routledge. pp. 119–130. DOI: 10.4324/9781003177098-11 - 12Morehead, K, Dunlosky, J, Rawson, KA, Blasiman, R and Benjamin Hollis, R. 2019. Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: Implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory, 27(6): 807–819. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694
- 13Mueller, PA and Oppenheimer, DM. 2014. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6): 1159–1168. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614524581
- 14Nichols, M. 2020. Reading and studying on the screen: An overview of literature towards good learning design practice. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 24(1): 121–131.
- 15Pappano, L. 2012. The year of the MOOC. New York Times, 2 November.
- 16Piolat, A, Olive, T and Kellogg, RT. 2005. Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3): 291–312.
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1086 - 17Sharples, M and Ferguson, R. 2014. Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. EC-TEL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 98–111. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_8
- 18Sharples, M and Ferguson, R. 2019.
Pedagogy-informed design of conversational learning at scale . ECTEL. Delft, NL (16–19 September).http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2437/paper2.pdf . - 19Simpson, N. 2018. Listening to students. Previously available at
https://www.oustudents.com/interview-with-nicola-simpson-listening-to-students/ (Last accessed 20 February 2021). - 20Singer, LM and Alexander, PA. 2017. Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6): 1007–1041. DOI: 10.3102/0034654317722961
- 21Spencer, C. 2006. Research on learners’ preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 21(1): 33–50.
https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/70 . - 22Stokoe, E, Benwell, B and Attenborough, F. 2013. University students managing engagement, preparation, knowledge and achievement: Interactional evidence from institutional, domestic and virtual settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(2): 75–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.01.001
- 23Tuffour, I. 2017. A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4): 52. DOI: 10.4172/2472-1654.100093
- 24Van Dijk, J and Hacker, K. 2003. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4): 315–326. DOI: 10.1080/01972240309487
- 25W3C. 2023. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/ (Last accessed 20 January 2024). - 26Watkins, R, Corry, M, Dardick, W and Stella, J. 2015. Note-taking habits of online students: Value, quality, and support. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(3): 1.