References
- 1Allan, G and Wolf, W. 1978. Relationships between perceived attributes of innovations and their subsequent adoption. Peabody Journal of Education, 55(4): 332–336. DOI: 10.1080/01619567809538207
- 2Allen, N, Bell, S and Billings, M. 2014. Spreading the word, building a community: Vision for a national OER movement. Against the Grain, 26. DOI: 10.7771/2380-176X.6842
- 3Anderson, T, Doney, J, Hendrix, B, Martinez, J, Stoddart, R and Wright, M. 2019. The five laws of OER: Observations from Ranganathan. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 7(1). DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2299
- 4Baker, A and Ippoliti, C. 2019. Student-driven OER: Championing the student voice in campus-wide efforts. In: Wesolek, A, Lashley, J and Langley, A (eds.), OER: A field guide for academic librarians, editor’s cut. Pacific University Press.
https://boisestate.pressbooks.pub/oer-field-guide/chapter/student-driven-oer-championing-the-student-voice-in-campus-wide-efforts/ . - 5Battles, M. 2004. Library: An unquiet history. New York: WW Norton & Company.
- 6Bell, S. 2018. Course materials adoption: A faculty survey and outlook for the OER landscape (Choice White Paper no. 3). American Library Association.
http://choice360.org/librarianship/whitepaper . - 7Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- 8Chtena, N. 2019. The social construction of openness: Open textbooks and their interpretations. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 15(3): 21–41. DOI: 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v15i03/23-40
- 9Delimont, N, Turtle, EC, Bennett, A, Adhikari, K and Lindshield, BL. 2016. University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative. Research in Learning Technology, 24. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v24.29920
- 10Drabinski, E. 2013. Queering the catalog: Queer theory and the politics of correction. The Library Quarterly, 83(2): 94–111. DOI: 10.1086/669547
- 11Essmiller, K, Thompson, P and Alvarado-Albertorio, F. 2020. Performance improvement technology for building a sustainable OER initiative in an academic library. TechTrends, 64(2): 265–274. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-019-00467-2
- 12Hawkins, K. 2019. Creating a library publishing program for scholarly books: Your options are limited. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 7(1). DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2262
- 13Hess, J, Nann, AJ and Riddle, KE. 2016. Navigating OER: The library’s role in bringing OER to campus. The Serials Librarian, 70(1–4): 128–134. DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2016.1153326
- 14Jhangiani, R. 15 October, 2019. For-profit, faux-pen, and critical conversations about the future of learning materials. Rajiv Jhangiani, Ph.D. [online]. Available at
https://thatpsychprof.com/for-profit-faux-pen-and-critical-conversations/ . - 15Jung, E, Bauer, C and Heaps, A. 2017. Strategic implementation of open educational resources in higher education institutions. Educational Technology, 57(2): 78–84.
- 16Kleymeer, P, Kleinman, M and Hanss, T. 2010. Reaching the heart of the university: Libraries and the future of OER. In: Proceedings of the 7th Open Education Conference (OpenEd2010),
2–4 November 2010 Barcelona. UOC, OU, BYU .http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/4866 . - 17Lankes, RD. 2011. The atlas of new librarianship. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8755.001.0001
- 18Lashley, J, Cummings-Sauls, R, Bennett, AB and Lindshield, BL. 2017. Cultivating textbook alternatives from the ground up: One public university’s sustainable model for open and alternative educational resource proliferation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3010
- 19Lauritsen, K. 2019, July 22–26. Open textbook library. Paper presented to The Open Textbook Network Summer Institute, Chaska, Minnesota,
22–26 July 2019 . - 20Merriam, SB and Tisdell, EJ. 2016. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons.
- 21Miao, F, Mishra, S, Orr, D and Janssen, B. 2019. Guidelines on the development of open educational resources policies. UNESCO Publishing.
- 22Moore, S, Neylon, C, Eve, MP, O’Donnell, DP and Pattinson, D. 2017. “Excellence R Us”: University research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.10
- 23Pitcher, K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The open SUNY textbooks program. Against the Grain, 26(5): 10. DOI: 10.7771/2380-176X.6844
- 24Reed, JB and Jahre, B. 2019. Reviewing the current state of library support for open educational resources. Collection Management, 44(2–4): 232–243. DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2019.1588181
- 25Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. Free Press.
- 26Sandy, HM and Mattern, JB. 2018. Academic library-based publishing: A state of the evolving art. Library Trends, 67(2): 337–357. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0040
- 27Schlosser, M, Hamilton, L, Neds-Fox, J, Bielavitz, T and Hoff, A. 2017.
Introduction. In: The Library Publishing Coalition Direction Committee, ed . Library publishing directory 2018. Library Publishing Coalition. pp. vii–xi.https://librarypublishing.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/LPC_LPDirectory2018.pdf . - 28Smeltekop, T. 2014. The Michigan State University course materials program: Packing up your textbook troubles with course packs. Against the Grain, 26(5): 27–28. DOI: 10.7771/2380-176X.6845
- 29Soper, D, Wharton, L and Phillips, J. 2018.
Expediting OER on campus: A multifaceted approach . In: Jensen, K and Nackerud, S (eds.), The evolution of affordable content efforts in higher education: Programs, case studies and examples. University of Minnesota Libraries. pp. 134–148. - 30Stacey, P and Pearson, SH. 2017. Made with creative commons. Ctrl+Alt+Delete Books.
- 31Sutton, SC and Chadwell, FA. 2014. Open textbooks at Oregon State University: A case study of new opportunities for academic libraries and university presses. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(4): 34–48. DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1174
- 32Tennant, JP, Dugan, JM, Graziotin, D, Jacques, DC, Waldner, F, Mietchen, D and Masuzzo, P. 2017. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6: 1151. 120037. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research
- 33VanScoy, A. 2019. Bridging the chasm: Faculty support roles for academic librarians in the adoption of Open Educational Resources. College & Research Libraries, 80(4): 426–449. DOI: 10.5860/crl.80.4.426
- 34Walker, J. 1999. Diffusions of Innovations Theory applied: The adoption of digital on-demand technology by book publishers and printers. (Masters). University of Tennessee.
https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk/gradthes/1926 . - 35Walz, AR. 2015. Open and editable: Exploring library engagement in Open Educational Resource adoption, adaptation and authoring. Online Submission, 61: 23–31. DOI: 10.21061/valib.v61i1.1326
- 36Wiley, D. n.d. Defining the “open” in open content and open educational resources.
http://opencontent.org/definition/ . - 37Wiley, D, Bliss, TJ and McEwen, M. 2014.
Open educational resources: A review of the literature . In: Spector, J, Merrill, M, Elen, J and Bishop, M (eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer. pp. 781–789. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63 - 38Wiley, D and Hilton, JL,
III . 2018. Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4): 133–147. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601 - 39Yin, R. 2019. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. 6th ed. Sage.