References
- 1Amsler, R and Facer, K. 2017. Learning the future otherwise: Emerging approaches to critical anticipation in education. Futures, 94. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.004
- 2Barkley, E. 2010. Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Franciso, CA: Wiley and Sons.
- 3Barrett, E. 2020. Active learning in the digital world: Inspiring learning. UK: JISC
http://inspiringlearning.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2020/07/active-learning-in-the-digital-world/ . - 4Biesta, G. 2012. Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2): 35–49. DOI: 10.29173/pandpr19860
- 5Bond, M, Buntins, K, Bedenlier, S, Zawacki-Richter, O and Kerres, M. 2020. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1): 1–30. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
- 6Coates, H. 2007. A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2): 121–141. DOI: 10.1080/02602930600801878
- 7Downes, S. 2011. Free learning: Essays on open educational resources and copyright.
https://www.downes.ca/files/books/FreeLearning.pdf . - 8Edinburgh University Centre for Research in Digital Education. 2020. Near future teaching.
https://www.de.ed.ac.uk/project/near-future-teaching . - 9Facer, K and Sandford, R. 2010. The next 25 years?: Future scenarios and future directions for education and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00337.x
- 10Fung, D and Carnell, B. 2017. Connected curriculum: Enhancing programmes of study. 2nd ed. London: University College
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/sites/teaching-learning/files/connected_curriculum_brochure_oct_2017.pdf . - 11Garrison, D, Anderson, T and Archer, W. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3): 87–105. DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
- 12Garrison, D, Anderson, T and Archer, W. 2001. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 7–23. DOI: 10.1080/08923640109527071
- 13Garrison, D and Cleveland-Innes, M. 2005. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3): 133–148. DOI: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- 14Gourlay, L. 2015. ‘Student engagement’ and the tyranny of participation. Teaching in Higher Education 20(4): 402–411. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020784
- 15Gourlay, L. 2020. Quarantined, sequestered, closed: theorising academic bodies under Covid-19 lockdown. Postdigital Science and Education, 2: 791–811. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00193-6
- 16Gourlay, L. 2021. Posthumanism and the digital university: Texts, bodies and materialities. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781350038202
- 17Gourlay, L, Littlejohn, A, Oliver, M and Potter, J. 2021. Lockdown literacies and semiotic assemblages: Academic boundary work in the Covid-19 crisis. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1900242
- 18Kahn, P. 2013. Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6): 1005–1018. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3121
- 19Kahu, E. 2013. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5): 758–773. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
- 20Kahu, E and Nelson, K. 2018. Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1): 58–71. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
- 21Kahu, E, Picton, C and Nelson, K. 2020. Pathways to engagement: A longitudinal study of the first-year student experience in the educational interface. Higher Education, 79(4), 657–673. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-019-00429-w
- 22Knox, J. 2016. Posthumanism and the massive online course: Contaminating the subject of global higher education. London, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315674032
- 23Macfarlane, B. 2017. Freedom to learn: The threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed. Abingdon: Routledge.
- 24Quaye, J and Harper, J. (eds.) 2015. Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
- 25Siemens, G. 2005. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1): 3–10.
- 26Trowler, V. 2010. Student engagement literature review. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
- 27UCL. 2021a. ChangeMakers. Available at
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/changemakers/ (Last accessed 6 July 2021). - 28UCL. 2021b. Moving online to teaching and homeworking.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-and-centres/centres/ucl-knowledge-lab/our-research/ucl-moving-online-teaching-and-homeworking-moth (Last accessed 6 July 2021).