Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Caring in Practice, Caring for Knowledge Cover
By: Johanna Funk  
Open Access
|Sep 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Criteria for Evaluation.

Theory related criteria
Knowledge authority
Authentic learning
Collaborative, communicative action
Community of Practice
Universal Design Principles (and accredited requirements for online readiness)
Table 2

Optional open-ended questions for Student Evaluations.

1. What were the best aspects of this unit and its teaching staff?
2. Can you elaborate on any of your more critical responses above (or any other areas where you think this unit needs to improve)?
3. Please comment on any part of your learning experience; how we talked about the cultures we participate in, the ways we contribute to our future learning and work, how we interact with other humans via the platforms we learn and work on (e.g., discussion board, feed forward, tutorial sessions, flexibility, learning environment, report writing, working in pairs/teams).
Table 3

Criteria and results for Evaluation and Content Analysis of unit materials.

THEORY RELATED CRITERIADATA ITEM IDENTIFIED IN EVALUATIONISSUEOUTCOMEFUTURE ACTIONS
Knowledge authorityYolŋu lecturers’ videosNeed more framing and centringScaffolded more; tied into lecturesNeed to reinforce links to student experience
Authentic learningMental healthGenerally, an issue these daysdiscuss consent, triggering content, trauma informedWeekly polling, word clouds, interactive
Collaboration, communicative action, COPStudent experience and expectationsWant 1: 1 feedback, resistant to critical reflectionWelcome video for navigating, critical thinking, co-creation, and agency increased systematicallyNeeds links to disciplines, assessment and study help, open text, Discussion Board engagement protocols
COP, Authentic learningMy View resultsStudents want more staffChange assessments to quizzes an option but this is disposable learningMore Rubric-based self and peer evaluation
Authentic learning, COPDigital LiteracyLMS is not social media, info-seeking digital skillsJISC digital, needs online cultural awareness, digital learning skillsPublishing work openly on platforms, Open texts
Authentic learning, COPInformation LiteracyScope of sources and ‘info-demic’We need 4 moves applied to current issues, case study on digital criticalityhttps://webliteracy.pressbooks.com/chapter/four-strategies/
Collaboration, communicative actionContent presentationNeeds more scaffoldingFor low bandwidth options, mobile phones, time, data povertyReview with this again Cali College criteria UCT
Online Course Design
communicative action, COPpedagogical practicesInconsistent uptake of practices distinct from contentLanguage use, connectedness, situated, intercultural, participatoryFramework needs re-potting for students to use
Authentic learning, COPa/synch/hyflex deliveryStudents have isolated experienceWelcome video and set up pre- week 1Discussion Board engagement protocols
Universal Design PrinciplesCommunication clarityConfusion/info overloadNeed to keep editing questions/assignment guidelines
Instructional text with each link
Streamline assessment and materials (ongoing)
jime-2021-1-648-g1.png
Table 4

Student Ratings of Pedagogy.

Table 5

Commonly Used Words in Student Feedback.

10 learning9 discussion6 board5 environment5 online
5 student5 students5 way4 helpful4 readings
4 really4 tutorial4 unit4 well3 academic
3 best3 content3 create3 culture3 even
3 external3 feel3 group3 knowledge3 lectures
jime-2021-1-648-g2.png
Figure 1

Word Cloud of Commonly Used words.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.648 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2021
Accepted on: May 25, 2021
Published on: Sep 8, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Johanna Funk, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.