Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Social Justice and K-12 Teachers’ Effective Use of OER: A Cross-Cultural Comparison by Nations Cover

Social Justice and K-12 Teachers’ Effective Use of OER: A Cross-Cultural Comparison by Nations

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2020 (2020): Issue 1
By: Hengtao Tang and  Yu Bao  
Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. 1Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 19(6): 716–723. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
    Back to article
  2. 2Atkins, DE, Brown, JS and Hammond, AL. 2007. A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities (Vol. 164). Mountain View: Creative common.
    Back to article
  3. 3Bozkurt, A, Koseoglu, S and Singh, L. 2019. An analysis of peer reviewed publications on openness in education in half a century: Trends and patterns in the open hemisphere. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4). DOI: 10.14742/ajet.4252
    Back to article
  4. 4Büchi, M, Just, N and Latzer, M. 2016. Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in Internet use. New Media & Society, 18(11): 2703–2722. DOI: 10.1177/1461444815604154
    Back to article
  5. 5Chang, M and Kim, S. 2009. Computer access and computer use for science performance of racial and linguistic minority students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(4): 469–501. DOI: 10.2190/EC.40.4.e
    Back to article
  6. 6Cobo, C. 2013. Exploration of open educational resources in non-English speaking communities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2): 106–128. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1493
    Back to article
  7. 7Cox, G and Trotter, H. 2016. Institutional culture and OER policy: How structure, culture, and agency mediate OER policy potential in South African universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2523
    Back to article
  8. 8Dolan, JE. 2016. Splicing the divide: A review of research on the evolving digital divide among K–12 students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(1): 16–37. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2015.1103147
    Back to article
  9. 9Farrow, R, Pitt, R, de los Arcos, B, Perryman, LA, Weller, M and McAndrew, P. 2015. Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: Data from OER Research Hub (2013–2014). British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5): 972–976. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12310
    Back to article
  10. 10Fraser, N. 2005. Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36: 69–88. Available at https://newleftreview.org/II/36/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world.
    Back to article
  11. 11Gershenson, S. 2013. Do summer time-use gaps vary by socioeconomic status? American Educational Research Journal, 50(6): 1219–1248. DOI: 10.3102/0002831213502516
    Back to article
  12. 12Gunkel, D. 2003. Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5(4): 499–522. DOI: 10.1177/146144480354003
    Back to article
  13. 13Haßler, B and Jackson, AMM. 2010. Bridging the bandwidth gap: Open educational resources and the digital divide. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(2): 110–115. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2010.8
    Back to article
  14. 14Hew, KF and Brush, T. 2007. Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3): 223–252. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
    Back to article
  15. 15Higashi, RM, Schunn, CD and Flot, JB. 2017. Different underlying motivations and abilities predict student versus teacher persistence in an online course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6): 1471–1493. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-017-9528-z
    Back to article
  16. 16Hilton, J. 2016. Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4): 573–590. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
    Back to article
  17. 17Hilton, J, III. 2017. Special issue: Outcomes of openness: Empirical reports on the implementation of OER. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(4): i–v. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3378
    Back to article
  18. 18Hilton, J, III, Wiley, D, Stein, J and Johnson, A. 2010. The four ‘R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(1): 37–44. DOI: 10.1080/02680510903482132
    Back to article
  19. 19Hilton, JL, III, Robinson, TJ, Wiley, D and Ackerman, JD. 2014. Cost-savings achieved in two semesters through the adoption of open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2): 67–84. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1700
    Back to article
  20. 20Hodgkinson-Williams, CA. 2015. Open educational resources and pedagogical practices in African higher education: A perspective from the ROER4D Project. Transform 2015 Colloquium. Available at http://transform2015.net/live/Resources/Papers/keynote1CHW.pdf.
    Back to article
  21. 21Hodgkinson-Williams, CA and Trotter, H. 2018. A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the global south. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 5(3): 204–224.
    Back to article
  22. 22Hofstede, G. 1986. Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10: 301–320. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
    Back to article
  23. 23Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
    Back to article
  24. 24Hofstede, G. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1): 8. DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
    Back to article
  25. 25Hollingworth, S, Mansaray, A, Allen, K and Rose, A. 2011. Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4): 347–360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00431.x
    Back to article
  26. 26Jung, I and Lee, J. 2020. A cross-cultural approach to the adoption of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1): 263–280. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12820
    Back to article
  27. 27King, M, Pegrum, M and Forsey, M. 2018. MOOCs and OER in the global south: Problems and potential. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742
    Back to article
  28. 28Kizilcec, RF, Piech, C and Schneider, E. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Suthers, D, Verbert, K and Duval, E (eds.), LAK’13 Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, 170–179. April 2013 Leuven. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2460296.2460330
    Back to article
  29. 29Kurelovic, EK. 2015. Advantages and limitations of usage of open educational resources in small countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1): 136. DOI: 10.21890/ijres.92299
    Back to article
  30. 30Lambert, SR. 2018. Changing our (dis) course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 5(3): 225–244.
    Back to article
  31. 31Lin, YJ and Tang, H. 2017. Exploring student perceptions of the use of open educational resources to reduce statistics anxiety. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(2): 110–125. DOI: 10.1007/s41686-017-0007-z
    Back to article
  32. 32Nakata, C. (ed.) 2009. Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Back to article
  33. 33Ngimwa, P and Wilson, T. 2012. An empirical investigation of the emergent issues around OER adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(4): 398–413. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2012.685076
    Back to article
  34. 34OERRH. 2014. OER Research Hub. Available at http://oerresearchhub.org/ (Last accessed 8 May 2015).
    Back to article
  35. 35Reinhart, JM, Thomas, E and Toriskie, JM. 2011. K-12 teachers: Technology use and the second level digital divide. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3): 181–193.
    Back to article
  36. 36Rideout, VJ, Foeh, UG and Roberts, DF. 2010. Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
    Back to article
  37. 37Robinson, TJ, Fischer, L, Wiley, D and Hilton, J, III. 2014. The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7): 341–351. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X14550275
    Back to article
  38. 38Rohs, M and Ganz, M. 2015. OER and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6): 1–19. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
    Back to article
  39. 39Scheerder, A, van Deursen, A and van Dijk, J. 2017. Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8): 1607–1624. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
    Back to article
  40. 40Tang, H and Wang, N. 2017. Have massive open online courses disrupted higher education around the globe? Exploring the cultural perspective. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 13(1): 45–54.
    Back to article
  41. 41Tang, H, Lin, Y and Qian, Y. 2020. Understanding K-12 teachers’ intention to adopt Open Educational Resources: A mixed methods inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12937
    Back to article
  42. 42Tichenor, PJ, Donohue, GA and Olien, CN. 1970. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2): 159–170. DOI: 10.1086/267786
    Back to article
  43. 43UNDP. (n.d. a). United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Index. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.
    Back to article
  44. 44UNDP. (n.d. b). United Nations Development Programme, Gender Development Index. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-development-index-gdi.
    Back to article
  45. 45UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (n.d.). What are open educational resources (OER)? Available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/access-toknowledge/open-educational-resources/what-are-open-educational-resources-oers/.
    Back to article
  46. 46van Deursen, AJ and van Dijk, JA. 2014. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3): 507–526. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813487959
    Back to article
  47. 47Wiley, D, Hilton, JL, III, Ellington, S and Hall, T. 2012. A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3): 262–276. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1153
    Back to article
  48. 48Wood, L and Howley, A. 2012. Dividing at an early age: The hidden digital divide in Ohio elementary schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1): 20–39. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2011.567991
    Back to article
  49. 49Zhang, M. 2015. Internet use that reproduces educational inequalities: Evidence from big data. Computers & Education, 86: 212–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.007
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.576 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 3, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 3, 2020
Published on: May 11, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
open educational resources,
social justice,
second-level digital divide,
K-12 teachers,
cultural dimensions,
exploratory research,
stepwise logistic regression

© 2020 Hengtao Tang, Yu Bao, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2020 (2020): Issue 1Next article