Equipping the Next Generation for Responsible Research and Innovation with Open Educational Resources, Open Courses, Open Communities and Open Schooling: An Impact Case Study in Brazil

Alexandra Okada; Tony Sherborne

doi:10.5334/jime.482

References

Aikenhead, GS. 2006. Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, Teachers College Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alcaraz-Domínguez, S, Barajas Frutos, M, Malagrida, R and Pérez, F. 2015. ‘Els projectes Europeus Engaging Science, Xplore Health, RRI Tools i Scientix’. Ciències: revista del professorat de ciències de Primària i Secundària, 30: 47–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bardone, E, Burget, M, Saage, K and Taaler, M. 2017. ‘Making Sense of Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education through Inquiry-based Learning: Examples from the Field’. Science Education International, 28(4): 293–304.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bayram-Jacobs, D. 2015. ‘Responsible Research and Innovation: What is it? How to Integrate in Science Education’. Presented at International Congress on Education for the Future: Issues and Challenges (ICEFIC 2015) Conference. Ankara University, Turkey, 13–15 May.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bayram-Jacobs, D, Henze, I, Evagorou, M, Shwartz, Y, Aschim, E, Alcaraz-Domínguez, S, Dagan, E and Barajas, M. 2017. ‘Exploring the impact of educative materials on teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge’. ESERA Conference. Dublin City University, Dublin, 21–25 August [Online]. Available at: https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5233/pdf/ESERA2017_0408_paper.pdf (Accessed 9 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blonder, R, Rap, S, Zemler, E and Rosenfeld, S. 2017. ‘Assessing Attitudes about Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): The Development and Use of a Questionnaire’. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 5(3): 122–156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blonder, R, Zemler, E and Rosenfeld, S. 2016. ‘The story of lead: A context for learning about responsible research and innovation (RRI) in the chemistry classroom’. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4): 1145–1155. DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00177G
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruner, JS. 1960. The Process of education. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burget, M, Bardone, E and Pedaste, M. 2017. ‘Definitions and conceptual dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A literature review’. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clarke, D and Hollingsworth, H. 2002. ‘Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8): 947–967. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
David, PA. 2007. The Historical Origins of ‘Open Science’. Discussion paper, Stanford, CA, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research [Online]. Available at: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/06-38.pdf. (Accessed 9 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Davis, EA and Krajcik, JS. 2005. ‘Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning’. Educational Researcher, 34(3): 3–14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X034003003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Vocht, M, Laherto, A and Parchmann, I. 2017. ‘Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing Responsible Research and Innovation to European science classrooms’. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(4): 326–346. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1343602
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DuFour, R and Eaker, R. 1998. Professional Learning Communities at Work. Bloomington, National Educational Service.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dwyer, D, Ringstaff, C and Sandholtz, J. 1991. ‘Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms’. Educational Leadership, 48(8): 45–52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission (EC). 2012. Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsibleresearch-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf (Accessed 9 April 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission (EC). 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation – Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf (Accessed 24 June 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission (EC). 2015. Indicators for promoting and monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/rri_indicators_final_version.pdf (Accessed 24 June 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fullick, P and Ratcliffe, M. 1996. Teaching Ethical Aspects of Science. Southampton, The Bassett Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorghiu, G, Anghel, GA and Ion, RM. 2015. ‘Students’ Perception Related to a Responsible Research and Innovation Demarche’. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180: 600–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.166
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorghiu, LM, Dumitrescu, C and Petrescu, AMA. 2016. ‘Introducing RRI in Science Teaching – An Actual Challenge for Science Teachers’. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 18: 183–191. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.12.25
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gott, R and Duggan, S. 1996. ‘Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science’. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7): 791–806. DOI: 10.1080/0950069960180705
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guskey, TR and Huberman, M. 1995. Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms & Practices. New York, Teacher’s College Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hoban, GF. 2002. Teacher Learning for Educational Change. Buckingham, Open University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodson, D. 2011. Looking to the Future. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-472-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodson, D. 2014. ‘Becoming part of the solution: Learning about activism, learning through activism, learning from activism’. In: Bencze, L and Alsop, S (Eds.), Activist Science and Technology Education, 67–98. Netherlands, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jarman, R and McClune, B. 2007. Developing Scientific Literacy: Using News Media In The Classroom. Maidenhead, London: Open University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiki-Papadakis, K and Chaimala, F. 2016. ‘The Embedment of Responsible Research and Innovation Aspects in European Science Curricula’. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 8(2): 71–87. DOI: 10.18662/rrem/2016.0802.06
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kop, R, Fournier, H and Mak, JSF. 2011. ‘A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses’. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7): 74–93. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Loucks-Horsley, S, Hewson, PW, Love, N and Stiles, KE. 1998. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mikroyannidis, A, Okada, A, Correa, A and Scott, P. 2016. ‘Inquiry-Based Learning on the Cloud’. In: Chao, L (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Cloud-Based STEM Education for Improved Learning Outcomes, 291–310. Hershey PA, USA, Information Science Reference. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9924-3.ch019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A. 2014. ‘Scaffolding school students’ scientific argumentation in inquiry-based learning with evidence maps’. In: Okada, A, Buckingham, S, Simon, J and Sherborne, T (Eds.), Knowledge Cartography, 135–172. London, Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A. 2016a. Engaging Science: Innovative Teaching for Responsible Citizenship. Milton Keynes, The Open University – UK.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A. 2016b. Responsible research and innovation in science education report. Milton Keynes, The Open University – UK.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A and Bayram-Jacobs, D. 2016. ‘Opportunities and challenges for equipping the next generation for responsible citizenship through the ENGAGE HUB’. Research papers presented at the 2016 LSME International Conference on Responsible Research in Education and Management and its Impact, 42–57. London 13th–15th January 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Costa, A, Kowalski, R, Torres, P, Nakayama, M and Souza, K. 2016. ‘Open Educational Resources for Responsible Research and Innovation: a case study with Brazilian universities and schools’. International Conference on Responsible Research in Education and Management and its Impact, 42–57. London 13th–15th January 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Kowalski, RPG, Kirner, C and Torres, PL. 2018. ‘Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of AR inquiry games to foster skills for Responsible Research and Innovation’. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5). Early access. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1473257
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Rossi, LC and Costa, A. 2015a. ‘Online argumentative maps for facilitating international debates with experts at large scale’. EC-TEL The 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Toledo, 15–18 September 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Wolff, A, Mikroyannidis, A and Ashton, S. 2015b. ‘Promoting partnerships among Universities, Schools and Research Centres to foster Responsible Research and Innovation for smart citizenship’. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Technology, Policy and Innovation, Milton Keynes, 17–19 June 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Young, G and Sanders, J. 2015d. ‘Fostering Communities of Practices for teachers’ professional development integrating OER and MOOC’. EC-TEL The 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Toledo, 15–18 September 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Okada, A, Young, G and Sherborne, T. 2015c. ‘Innovative teaching of responsible research and innovation in science education’. E-Leaning Papers, Open Education Europa Journal, 44(1): 180–195.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Open University (OU-UK). 2018. Outstanding Impact of Research on Society and Prosperity – Criteria. The Open University Research Excellence Awards 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Osborne, J. 2010. ‘Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse’. Science, 328(5977): 463–466. DOI: 10.1126/science.1183944
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Owen, R, Macnaghten, P and Stilgoe, J. 2012. ‘Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society’. Science and Public Policy, 39(6): 751–760. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Owen, R, Stilgoe, J, Macnaghten, P, Gorman, M, Fisher, E and Guston, D. 2013. ‘A framework for responsible innovation’. In: Owen, R, Bessant, J and Heintz, M (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 27–50. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peciuliauskiene, P. 2017. ‘The engagement of secondary school learners for learning science by responsible research and innovation’. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, II: 151–162. 26–27 May. DOI: 10.17770/sie2017vol2.2249
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petrescu, AM, Gorghiu, G and Lupu, RA. 2015. ‘Non-formal Education-Frame for Responsible Research and Innovation Demarches’. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180: 682–687. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.178
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pinto, SM, Ribeiro, SF, Rocha, AKLT and Okada, A. 2018. ‘Argumentação de estudantes da educação básica sobre dilemas sócio-científicos no Projeto ENGAGE’. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 13(1): 207–228. DOI: 10.21723/riaee.v13.n1.2018.10242
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rocha, AK, Rocha, AB and Okada, A. 2017. ‘Rubric to assess evidence-based dialogue of socio-scientific issues with LiteMap’. The 2017 International Technology Enhanced Assessment Conference, 5–6 October 2017. Barcelona.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, EM. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. New York, NY, Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryan, C. 2015. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf (Accessed 9 November 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sherborne, T and Okada, A. 2013. ‘Equipping the next generation for Research and Innovation’. Scientix Conference 2013, 14–16 March 2013. Lisbon, Portugal.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Supovitz, JA and Turner, HM. 2000. ‘The effects of professional development on science teaching practice in classroom culture’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9): 963–980. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9%3C963::AID-TEA6%3E3.0.CO;2-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sutcliffe, H. 2011. A report on Responsible Research & Innovation. MATTER and the European Commission.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Torres, PL, Fialho, NN, Kowalski, RPG and Okada, A. 2016. ‘Responsible Research and Innovation for the Media Facebook: Community Involvement in the Study on Agrobiodiversity’. Creative Education, 7(15): 2141–2150. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2016.715212
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Von Schomberg, R. 2013. ‘A vision of responsible research and innovation’. In: Owen, R, Bessant, J and Heintz, M (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 51–74. London, Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wickson, F and Carew, AL. 2014. ‘Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: Learning from transdisciplinarity’. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(3): 254–273. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.963004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wideman, H. 2010. Online Teacher Learning Communities: A Literature Review. Institute for Research on Learning Technologies, Technical Report 2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article