Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sleep and Microdialysis: An Experiment and a Systematic Review of Histamine and Several Amino Acids Cover

Sleep and Microdialysis: An Experiment and a Systematic Review of Histamine and Several Amino Acids

Open Access
|Jul 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Medial prefrontal cortex microdialysis results.

Amino acidPhaseMedian (μM)25%–75% IQR (μM)NG(df)p
AsnWash-out1.280.40–2.241020.3 (4)<0.001
Baseline Light0.110.08–0.1911
Baseline Dark0.150.08–0.2011
SD0.110.10–0.2011
Recovery0.130.09–0.2011
            Sleep deprivation vs. Baseline Light: t = 42.5; p = 0.40
            Recovery vs. Baseline Dark: t = 31.0; p = 0.86
            Baseline Light vs. Baseline Dark: t = 40.0; p = 0.53
AspWash-out0.060.05–0.081020.3 (4)<0.001
Baseline Light0.050.04–0.0611
Baseline Dark0.040.04–0.0611
SD0.050.04–0.0611
Recovery0.050.03–0.0611
            Sleep deprivation vs. Baseline Light: t = 42.5; p = 0.40
            Recovery vs. Baseline Dark: t = 31.0; p = 0.86
            Baseline Light vs. Baseline Dark: t = 40.0; p = 0.53
GABAWash-out0.090.07–0.13103.44 (4)0.49
Baseline Light0.090.06–0.1311
Baseline Dark0.100.05–0.1111
SD0.080.06–0.1211
Recovery0.090.06–0.1111
GlnWash-out5.400.16–11.81010.67 (4)0.031
Baseline Light0.030.03–0.0911
Baseline Dark0.040.02–0.0511
SD0.070.02–0.0911
Recovery0.070.05–0.1211
            Sleep deprivation vs. Baseline Light: t = 31.0; p = 0.72
            Recovery vs. Baseline Dark: t = 62.0; p = 0.010
            Baseline Light vs. Baseline Dark: t = 23.0; p = 0.65
GluWash-out0.100.53–1.441015.2 (4)0.004
Baseline Light0.160.09–0.1911
Baseline Dark0.310.25–0.3411
SD0.270.26–0.3911
Recovery0.340.20–0.5011
            Sleep deprivation vs. Baseline Light: t = 61.0; p = 0.013
            Recovery vs. Baseline Dark: t = 46.0; p = 0.25
            Baseline Light vs. Baseline Dark: t = 66.0; p = 0.003
GlyWash-out0.430.26–0.781019.0 (4)0.001
Baseline Light0.110.08–0.1511
Baseline Dark0.080.06–0.1211
SD0.080.06–0.1111
Recovery0.080.06–0.1511
            Sleep deprivation vs. Baseline Light: t = 3.0; p = 0.23
            Recovery vs. Baseline Dark: t = 4.0; p = 0.55
            Baseline Light vs. Baseline Dark: t = 4.0; p = 0.55
HistWash-out0.040.03–0.05103.1 (4)0.54
Baseline Light0.030.03–0.0510
Baseline Dark0.040.03–0.0511
SD0.030.03–0.0511
Recovery0.030.03–0.0411
ProWash-out0.350.07–0.63105.3 (4)0.26
Baseline Light0.090.06–0.2610
Baseline Dark0.100.06–0.3610
SD0.120.07–0.3011
Recovery0.110.07–0.2611
TauWash-out0.610.55–0.85103.8 (4)0.44
Baseline Light0.880.51–1.1411
Baseline Dark0.850.60–1.1411
SD1.100.47–1.2311
Recovery0.600.35–0.9711

[i] Asn = Asparagine, Asp = Aspartate, GABA = Gamma-AminoButyric Acid, Gln =Glutamine, Glu = Glutamate, Gly = Glycine, Hist = Histamine, Pro = Proline, Tau = Taurine, SD = Sleep Deprivation, IQR = InterQuartile Range, N = number of rats, G = the test statistic of the Friedman’s test, df = degrees of freedom, p = p-value of the Friedman’s test.

jcr-17-183-g1.png
Figure 1

Flow scheme of retrieved and included references.

TiAb – Title-Abstract; μD = microdialysis.

Table 2

Studies of microdialysate histamine and amino acid levels during naturally occurring sleep.

Study_IDSpeciesBrain AreaSummary
Azuma_1996 [27]RatsmPOAGlu was higher during wake (2.04 ± 0.22μM) and wake-to NREM transitions (2.22 ± 0.63μM) than during NREM sleep (1.56 ± 0.27μM) or NREM-to wake transitions (1.26 ± 0.28μM).
Chu_2004 [28]RatsFrontal cortexHist release was 3.8 times higher during wake episodes (0.19 ± 0.01 pmol/20 min) than during sleep episodes (0.05 ± 0.002 pmol/20 min).
Gronli_2007 [26]RatsHippocampusGABA levels did not show state-dependent variations (wake: 1600.5 ± 393.4 fmol/sample; SWS: 1530.5 ± 408.4 fmol/24μl sample; REM: 1503.0 ± 388.1 fmol/sample).
Hasegawa_2000 [29]RatsPRNGly levels (in the low μM range, exact values not provided) were higher during REM than during NREM and wake. Glu and Gln levels (in the low μM range, exact values not provided) were not state-dependent.
John_2008 [22]RatsTMNNo significant differences in hypothalamic Glu levels were observed between REM (2.5 ± 0.17 pmol/10μl sample), SWS (2.4 ± 0.06 pmol/sample) and W (2.5 ± 0.17; 2.4 ± 0.06 and 2.3 ± 0.12 pmol/sample).
Kekesi_1997 [23]CatsVPLAsp, Asn, Glu, Gly, Tau and GABA were significantly elevated during SWS (exact values not provided) compared to the awake baseline (Asp: 1.7 ± 0.03 μM; Asn: 1.5 ± 2.0 μM;
Glu: 6.6 ± 0.3 μM; Gly: 8.7 ± 0.6 μM; Tau: 17.8 ± 0.7 μM; GABA: 0.7 ± 0.2 μM). Gln did not show state-dependent variations (61.3 ± 3.4 μM at baseline wake).
Kodama_1998 [30]CatsPIA, NMC, NPMGlu levels during SWS were taken as reference (NMC: 217.5 ± 21.9; PIA: 164.3 ± 18.1; NPM: 239.6 ± 23.5 fmol/min sample). During REMS, Glu in NMC increased to 111% of SWS, significantly different from Glu during W (98% of SWS). In the other areas no such difference was observed.
Lena_2005 [31]RatsmPFC, NaccIn the NAcc, Glu was lower during SWS (5.69 × 10–7 ± 1.53 M) and REM (5.57 × 10–7 ± 1.47 M) than during wake (9.28 × 10–7 ± 2.89 M). ANOVA indicated a difference in Asp concentrations (SWS: 2.24 × 10–7 ± 1.3 M; REM: 2.25 × 10–7 ± 1.21 M; wake: 5.1 × 10–7 ± 2.3 M), but post-hoc analyses were negative.
No state-dependent changes in Asp and Glu levels were observed in the mPFC (wake Asp: 2.51 × 10–7 ± 0.18 M; Glu: 16.2 × 10–7 ± 2.9 M; SWS Asp: 2.79 × 10–7 ± 0.58 M; Glu: 16.1 × 10–7 ± 6 2.5 M; REM Asp: 2.33 × 10–7 ± 0.28 M; Glu: 15.9 × 10–7 ± 2.6 M).
LopezRodriguez_2007 [32]RatsOrbitofrontal CortexGlu levels (range: 0.17–5.28 μM) were higher during REM (134 ± 14% of overall mean) than during wake (106 ± 5%), and lower during SWS (87 ± 5%) than during wake.
Nitz_1997a [33]CatsDorsal rapheGABA was higher during REM sleep (0.072 ± 0.003 pmol/μL) than during SWS (0.049 ± 0.007 pmol/μL) and wake (0.042 ± 0.005 pmol/μL). Glu (wake: 35.84 ± 2.55 pmol/μL; SWS: 36.42 ± 4.57 pmol/μL; REM: 33.98 ± 2.03 pmol/μL) and Gly (wake: 32.30 ± 4.29 pmol/μL; SWS: 34.05 ± 4.80 pmol/μL; REM: 33.89 ± 4.11 pmol/μL) levels were not state-dependent.
Nitz_1997b [34]CatsLocus CoeruleusGABA was higher during REM sleep (1.91 ± 0.2 fmol/μL) than during SWS (1.58 ± 0.2 fmol/μL) and wake (1.2 ± 0.3 fmol/μL). Glu (wake: 0.88 ± 0.20 pmol/μL; SWS: 0.90 ± 0.20 pmol/μL; REM: 0.95 ± 0.25 pmol/μL) and Gly (wake: 0.54 ± 0.16 pmol/μL; SWS: 0.45 ± 0.14 pmol/μL; REM: 0.48 ± 0.13 pmol/μL) levels were not state-dependent.
Strecker_2002 [35]CatsPOAHHist was highest during wakefulness (1.155 ± 0.225 pg/μl), lower during SWS (0.395 ± 0.081 pg/μl) and lowest during REM-sleep (0.245 ± 0.032 pg/μl). Note that after conversion (wake: 0.312 ± 0.061 pmol/20 min; REM 0.066 ± 0.009; SWS 0.107 ± 0.022), these values are quite comparable to those of Chu [28].
Vanini_2011 [36]CatsPRNGABA decreased during REM (0.268 ± 0.050 pmol/10μL) versus both wake (0.466 ± 0.046 pmol/10μL) and SWS (0.365 ± 0.046 pmol/10μL), which did not differ from each other.
Vanini_2012 [37]CatssCTX, BFIn the BF, GABA levels were higher during SWS (1.042 pmol/10μL) than during REM (0.836 pmol/10μL) and wake (0.977 pmol/10μL).
In the somatosensory cortex, GABA levels were higher during SWS (1.275 pmol/10μL) than during wake (1.15 pmol/10μL) and REM (0.932 pmol/10μL).
Watson_2011 [38]RatsPRNConcentrations of both Glu and GABA were higher during wake (Glu: 1.948 ± 0.018 μM; GABA: 0.428 ± 0.003 μM) than during NREM (Glu 85.8% of wake; GABA 89.0%) and REM (Glu 83.6% of wake; GABA 81.3%). Asp (0.522 ± 0.003 μM during wake), Tau (7.442 ± 0.055 μM during wake) and Gly (4.942 ± 0.046 μM during wake) did not show state-dependent changes.

[i] ANOVA = ANalysis Of VAriance; BF = Basal Forebrain; mPFC = Medial PreFrontal Cortex; NAcc = Nucleus Accumbens; NMC = Nucleus MagnoCellularis; NPM = Nucleus ParaMedianus; PIA = Pontine Inhibitory Area; POAH = Preoptic/Anterior Hypothalamic Area; NREM = Non-REM; PRN = Pontine Reticular Formation; sCTX = somatosensory Cortex; SWS = Slow Wave Sleep; TMN = TuberoMammillary Nucleus; VPL = VentroPosteroLateral thalamic nuclei.

Table 3

Sleep deprivation studies.

Study_IDSpeciesBrain AreaSD methodSummary
John_2008 [22]Ratshypothalamus, cortexGentle HandlingSleep deprivation had no significant effect on hypothalamic Glu (2.8 ± 0.02 vs. 2.5 ± 0.04 pmol/sample), but it increased cortical Glu (0.72 ± 0.14 μM vs. 0.35 ± 0.05 μM).
Strecker_2002 [35]CatsPOAHGentle HandlingHist levels during sleep deprivation (no exact values given) were comparable with those during wakefulness (1.155 ± 0.225 pg/μl; after conversion: 0.312 ± 0.061 pmol/20 min).
Vanini_2012 [37]CatsCTX, BFnaCortical GABA increased during extended wakefulness, BF GABA levels did not (no exact values given).
Xie_2015 [39]RatsHippocampusPlatform-water tank (PSD)Glu and GABA were higher at the end of 24h of paradoxical sleep deprivation (Glu: 500 ± 138 μmol/L; GABA: no exact values given) than during baseline (Glu: 0.74 ± 0.07 μmol/L; GABA: 0.27 ± 0.03 μmol/L). Of note, microdialysis flow was decreased during the SD period. Increased recovery due to decreased flow rate may have confounded these findings.
Zant_2012 [40]RatsBasal ForebrainGentle HandlingSleep deprivation increased Hist levels (in the nM range, no exact values given).

[i] BF = Basal Forebrain; CTX = Cortex; na = information not available; POAH = Preoptic/Anterior Hypothalamic Area.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcr.183 | Journal eISSN: 1740-3391
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2019
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2019
Published on: Jul 3, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Cathalijn H. C. Leenaars, W. H. Pim Drinkenburg, Christ Nolten, Maurice Dematteis, Ruud N. J. M. A. Joosten, Matthijs G. P. Feenstra, Rob B. M. De Vries, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.