Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Brain Microdialysate Monoamines in Relation to Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Sleep Deprivation – a Systematic Review, Network Meta-analysis, and New Primary Data Cover

Brain Microdialysate Monoamines in Relation to Circadian Rhythms, Sleep, and Sleep Deprivation – a Systematic Review, Network Meta-analysis, and New Primary Data

Open Access
|Jan 2019

Figures & Tables

jcr-17-174-g1.png
Figure 1

Flow scheme of screening process.

Table 1

Circadian rhythms in dopamine levels.

Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain RegionDopamine Levels
Dugovic et al (2009) [54]Rats6h–18h6hPrefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during DP
Barbier et al (2007) [55]Rats6h–18h20hPrefrontal CortexFairly stable
Nakayama et al (1993) [56]Rats8h–20h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during LP
No effect of extra 12h DP
Robinson et al (1991) [57]SheepNatural cycle20hPreoptic AreaStable during DP, higher during LP
Alfinito et al (2009) [58]Rats12:1212h30Preoptic AreaStable
Smith et al (1992) [46]Rats7h–19h18hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) A1 [59]Rats20h–8h30hStriatumLower during DP, higher during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B1 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hStriatumHigher at DP onset, then decrease and reach its lowest during LP
Hood et al (2010) [60]Rats8h–20h24hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Sano et al (1992) A [47]Rats, young animals6h–18h24hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Sano et al (1992) B [47]Rats, old animals6h–18h24hStriatumSame pattern but levels are lower
Sano et al (1992) C [47]Rats, enriched milieu6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Sano et al (1992) D [47]Rats, isolated6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Decker et al (2005) [53]Rats7h–19h48hStriatumA few spikes but mean is stable between DP and LP
De Marquez-Pardo et al (2000) [52]Rats8h–20h24hNeostriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Ferris et al (2014) A [48]RatsZT0–ZT1236hCaudate PutamenHigher during DP, lower during LP
Ferris et al (2014) B [48]MiceZT0–ZT1238hCaudate PutamenPeak at DP onset, higher during DP, lower during LP
Ferris et al (2014) C [48]Mice (DAT KO)ZT0–ZT1238hCaudate PutamenStable
Paulson et al (1994) 1 [61]Rats6h–20h20hCaudate NucleusHigher during DP (double the NAC levels), lower during LP
Paulson et al (1996) 1 [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Caudate NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Murillo-Rodriguez et al (2013) [63]Rats7h–19h6hNucleus AccumbensStable
Paulson et al (1994) 2 [61]Rats6h–20h20hNucleus AccumbensStable
Paulson et al (1996) 2 [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Nucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) A2 [59]Rats20h–8h30hNucleus AccumbensLower during DP, higher during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B2 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hNucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Verhagen et al (2009) [64]Rats2h–14h36hLateral to Nucleus Accumbens ShellHigher during DP, lower during LP
Fetissov et al (2000) 1 [65]Rats6h–18h24hLateral HypothalamusPeak at DP onset, then start to decrease after 2h. Stay stable during LP
Fetissov et al (2000) 2 [65]Rats6h–18h24hVentromedial HypothalamusGradually decrease
Izumo et al (2012) [66]Rats7h–19h15hCentral Nucleus of the AmygdalaHigher during DP, lower during LP (wide error bars)

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitude of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: L/D cycle: Light-Dark Cycle; LP: Light Phase; DP: Dark Phase; DAT KO: Dopamine Transporter Knock Out; ZT: Zeitgeber.

Table 2

Circadian rhythms in DOPAC levels.

Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain RegionDOPAC Levels
Ferris et al (2014) A [48]RatsZT0–ZT1236hCaudate PutamenHigher during DP, lower during LP
Paulson et al (1994) [61]Rats6h–20h20hCaudate NucleusHigher during DP, lower/stable during LP
Paulson et al (1996) [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Caudate NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) A1 [59]Rats20h–8h30hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B1 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Hucke et al (1998) A [51]Rats, nulliparous6h–18h8hStriatumHigher during DP, stable during LP
Hucke et al (1998) B [51]Rats, primiparous6h–18h8hStriatumHigher during DP, stable during LP
Sano et al (1992) A [47]Rats, young animals6h–18h24hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP. Highest values mid DP, lowest values mid LP
Sano et al (1992) B [47]Rats, old animals6h–18h24hStriatumSmaller variation and level of DOPAC than young group
Sano et al (1992) C [47]Rats, isolated6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Sano et al (1992) D [47]Rats, enriched environment6h–18h24hStriatumHigher levels than isolated, higher during DP, lower during LP
Smith et al (1992) [46]Rats7h–19h18hStriatumHighest during LP, decrease gradually during the entire duration, reach lowest during DP
De Marquez-Prado et al (2000) [52]Rats8h–20h24hNeostriatumDecrease during the entire duration (start at DP)
Castaneda et al (2004) A2 [59]Rats20h–8h30hNucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B2 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hNucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP.
Paulson et al (1994) [61]Rats6h–20h20hNucleus AccumbensIncrease during LP to be the highest at DP onset.
Stay stable during DP, lower during LP
Paulson et al (1996) [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Nucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Verhagen et al (2009) [64]Rats2h–14h36hLateral to Nucleus Accumbens ShellHigher during DP, highest at the end of DP Lowest level mid-LP. High range of fluctuation.
Nakayama et al (1993) [56]Rats8h–20h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexPeak at DP onset and about 3/4 DP, decrease strongly between the 2 peaks. Decrease during LP
Luo et al (2014) [67]Rats?24hSCNHigher during DP

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: DOPAC: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; L/D Cycle: Light-Dark Cycle; LP: Light Phase; DP: Dark Phase; SCN: Suprachiasmatic Nucleus; ZT: Zeitgeber.

Table 3

Circadian rhythms in serotonin levels.

Serotonin-Circadian Rhythms
Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain RegionSerotonin Levels
Huang et al (2008) [68]Rats6h–18h72hPineal GlandPeak at DP onset, then decrease at its lowest, before increasing again before LP. Stable during LP.
Sun et al (2002) [69]Rats11h–1h312hPineal GlandIncrease strongly at DP onset, then decrease gradually, increase at the end. Stable during LP.
Sun et al (2003) [70]Rats11h–1h132hPineal GlandPeak at DP onset, gradual decrease during the rest of DP. Increase during LP.
Azekawa et al (1991) [71]Rats7h–19h24hPineal GlandPeak after DP onset followed by strong decrease until mid DP. Then increase until LP onset. Lower during LP
Liu et al (2005) [72]Rats11h–23h72hPineal GlandPeak 1h after DP onset, and 3h before LP. Nadir is seen at LP beginning, followed by a gradual increase until DP onset.
Liu et al (2006) A [73]Rats (LEW)6h–18h120hPineal GlandHigher after DP onset, followed by a sharp decrease until the end of DP. Levels return to baseline level and stay stable during LP
Liu et al (2006) B [73]Rats (SD)6h–18h24hPineal GlandHigher after DP onset but shifted compared to LEW followed by a strong decrease until the end of DP. Return to baseline level and stay stable during LP
Liu et al (2006) C [73]Rats (Wistar TG)6h–18h24hPineal GlandHigher at about 1/3rd of DP, followed by a sharp decrease until the end of DP. Levels return to baseline level and stay stable during LP
Liu et al (2006) D [73]Rats (PVG)6h–18h24hPineal GlandHigher 1h after DP onset, followed by a decrease until the end of DP. Levels return to baseline level and stay stable during LP
Liu et al (2006) E [73]Rats (LEW)6h–18h24hPineal GlandHigher 3h–4h after DP onset, followed by decrease until the end of DP. Levels return to baseline level and stay stable during LP
Liu et al (2006) F [73]Hamsters6h–18h24hPineal GlandPeak at DP onset followed by an increase and fluctuations (less marked than in rats)
Garabette et al (2000) [74]Rats7h–19h24hAdjacent to SCNLower during DP. Higher during LP
Grossman et al (2000) A [75]Hamsters5h–19h11hLateral Margin of SCNHigher after DP onset. Stable during LP
Dudley et al (1998) A [76]Hamsters7h–22h24hLateral Margin of the SCNPeak at DP onset followed by gradual decrease. Stay stable during LP
Dudley et al (1998) B [76]Hamsters7h–22h48hLateral Margin of the SCNPeak 2h after DP onset, followed by gradual decrease. Stay stable during LP
Barassin et al (2002) [77]Rats12:1217hSCN or in Between SCN NucleiPeak at DP onset followed by decrease. Lower during LP
Knoch et al (2004) [78]Hamsters12:1224hSCNPeak 2h after DP onset, followed by decrease. Lower during LP
Oshima et al (2003) [79]Mice6h–18h24hHippocampusHigher during DP, peak at onset and mid DP. Decrease during LP (but one peak mid LP)
Lopez-Rodriguez et al (2003) a [80]Rats1h–13h24hPosterior HippocampusSmall peak at LP onset, yet fairly stable
Linthorst et al (1994) [81]Rats7h30–19h3011hHippocampusPeak at DP onset. Fairly stable during LP
Yang et al (2013) A [49]*Mice (SERT +/+)4h–16h20hVentral Hippocampus and Ventral StriatumPeak 3h after DP onset followed by a decrease. LP and rest of DP stable
Yang et al (2013) B [49]*Mice (SERT +/–)4h–16h20hVentral Hippocampus and Ventral StriatumSmaller peak 3h after DP onset followed by a sudden sharp decrease. LP and rest of DP stable. Or peak at 3h + peak 3h before LP onset. Or overall fluctuation
Yang et al (2013) C [49]*Mice (SERT –/–)4h–16h20hVentral Hippocampus and Ventral StriatumGradual decrease during both DP and LP
Kalen et al (1989) [82]Rats12:1224hCaudal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Penalva et al (2002) A [83]Mice (CHR-R1 +/+)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Penalva et al (2002) B [83]Mice (CHR-R1 +/–)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Penalva et al (2002) C [83]Mice (CHR-R1 –/–)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Takahashi et al (1998) [84]Rats7h–17h24hStriatumHigher during DP, stable during LP
Verhagen et al (2009) [64]Rats2h–14h36hLateral to Nucleus Accumbens ShellHigher during DP, lower during LP. Start increase 1h before DP onset, and reach its highest 5h after DP onset. Then decrease and reach nadir during mid-LP.
Izumo et al (2012) [66]Rats7h–19h15hCentral Nucleus of the AmygdalaPeak at DP onset and mid DP followed each time by gradual decrease. Stable during LP
Smriga et al (2002) [85]Rats7h–19h25hCentral Nucleus of the AmygdalaPeak at DP onset followed by gradual decrease. 1h before LP, increase to baseline level. Stable during LP
Dugovic et al (2009) [54]Rats6h–18h6hPrefrontal CortexHigher during DP, stable during LP
Barbier et al (2007) [55]Rats6h–18h20hPrefrontal CortexStable
Jitsuki et al (2009) A [50]Rats, male5h–19h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexFairly stable
Jitsuki et al (2009) B [50]Rats, diestrous5h–19h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during LP
Jitsuki et al (2009) C [50]Rats, proestrous5h–19h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during LP
Grossman et al (2004) [86]Hamsters14:1024hMargin of Thalamic Intergeniculate LeafletHigher 1h after DP onset, higher during DP Lower during LP, nadir mid LP
Sayer et al (1999) [87]Rats6h–18h?Anterior HypothalamusStable during DP, slightly higher during LP
Fetissov et al (2000) 1 [65]Rats6h–18h24hLateral hypothalamusStable apart from one peak during LP
Fetissov et al (2000) 2 [65]Rats6h–18h24hVentromedial HypothalamusPeak 1h–2h after DP onset, followed by a return to baseline. Stable during rest of DP and LP

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals. * These studies provided average monoamine concentrations pooled for several brain regions.

Abbreviations: L/D cycle: Light-Dark Cycle; LP: Light Phase; DP: Dark Phase; LEW: Lewis; SD: Sprague-Dawley; TG: Transgenic; SERT: Serotonin Transporter; SCN: Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.

Table 4

Circadian rhythms in 5–HIAA levels.

Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain Region5–HIAA Levels
Glass et al (1993) a [88]Hamsters8h–22h24hLateral margin of SCNPeak at DP onset followed by a gradual decrease.
Stable during LP, lower than DP
Luo et al (1999) A [89]Hamsters, glucose intolerant8h30–22h30 9h–23h24hTop of SCNIncrease during DP (peak 4h after DP onset), decreases during LP
Luo et al (1999) B [89]Hamsters, glucose tolerant8h30–22h30 9h–23h24hTop of SCNSmall peak during DP. Rather stable during LP
Barassin et al (2002) [77]Rats12:1217hSCN or in Between SCN NucleiPeak 4–6h after DP onset followed by decrease
Glass et al (1993) b [90]Hamsters7h–21h24hSCNPeak 2h after DP, increase during DP, decrease during LP
Glass et al (1992) A [91]Hamsters8h–0h24hSCNPeak 2h after DP onset, return to baseline at LP onset. Stable during LP except a decrease at 19h
Glass et al (1992) B [91]Hamsters8h–0h24hLateral Margin of the SCNPeak 2h after DP onset, return to baseline at LP onset. Stable during LP except a decrease at 19h
Luo et al (2000) [92]Hamsters0h–14h24hSCNPeak at DP onset and nadir 4h DP onset. Stable during the rest of sampling time.
Glass et al (1993) c [45]Hamsters8h–0h24hSCNPeak at DP onset, increases during DP, decreases during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) A1 [59]Rats20h–8h30hStriatumSlight increase during DP, slight decrease during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B1 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hStriatumLower during DP, higher during LP
Sano et al (1992) A [47]Rats, young animals6h–18h24hStriatumNadir at DP onset, then increase gradually until the end of DP. Start of LP decrease gradually.
Sano et al (1992) B [47]Rats, old animals6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Sano et al (1992) C [47]Rats, enriched media6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Sano et al (1992) D [47]Rats, isolated6h–18h24hStriatumStable
Smith et al (1992) [46]Rats7h–19h18hStriatumStable
Nakayama et al (2002) [93]Rats8h–20h24hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Takahashi et al (1998) [84]Rats7h–19h24hStriatumHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) A2 [59]Rats20h–8h30hNucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Castaneda et al (2004) B2 [59]Rats6h DP–24h LP30hNucleus AccumbensInconsistent during DP (fluctuation up and down), lower during LP
Paulson et al (1994) 2 [61]Rats6h–20h20hNucleus AccumbensHigher during DP, lower during LP
Paulson et al (1996) [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Nucleus AccumbensSlightly higher during DP, lower during LP
Verhagen et al (2009) [64]Rats2h–14h36hLateral to Nucleus Accumbens ShellHigher during DP (peak around the end of DP), lower during LP
Paulson et al (1994) 1 [61]Rats6h–20h20hCaudate NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Paulson et al (1996) [62]Rats6h–20h18h20Dorsolateral Caudate NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Oshima et al (2003) [79]Mice6h–18h24hHippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Nakayama et al (2002) [93]Rats8h–20h24hHippocampusStable
Linthorst et al (1994) [81]Rats7h30–19h3011hHippocampusFairly stable, higher at DP onset (slightly)
Kalen et al (1989) [82]Rats12:1224hCaudal HippocampusStable, apart from a peak at the end of DP
Penalva et al (2002) A [83]Mice, (CHR–R1 +/+)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Penalva et al (2002) B [83]Mice, (CHR–R1 +/–)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Penalva et al (2002) C [83]Mice, (CHR–R1 –/–)6h–18h18hDorsal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP (higher levels than other mice)
Glass et al (1992) C [91]Hamsters8h–0h24hPreoptic AreaPeak at DP onset followed by gradual decrease. Stable during LP
Ezrokhi et al (2014) A [94]Rats (CTL)5h–19h24hVentromedial HypothalamusGradual decrease (start at LP)
Ezrokhi et al (2014) B [94]Rats (SHR), treated with vehicle5h–19h24hVentromedial HypothalamusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Luo et al (1998) A [95]Hamsters, glucose tolerant8h30–22h3025hVentromedial HypothalamusLower level than intolerant group. Higher during DP with a peak at the end. Lower during LP
Luo et al (1998) B [95]Hamsters, glucose intolerant8h30–22h3025hVentromedial HypothalamusHigher level and more fluctuations than tolerant group. Levels increases during DP with a peak at the end. Lower levels during LP
Luo et al (1998) C [95]Hamsters (CTL)8h30–22h3025hVentromedial HypothalamusFairly stable, higher during DP (slightly)
Stanley et al (1989) a [96]Rats9h–21h24hParaventricular NucleusPeak 1h after DP onset followed by sudden decrease. Lower during LP
Glass et al (1992) D [91]Hamsters8h–0h24hPosterior HypothalamusPeak at DP onset followed by gradual decrease Stable during LP
Gonzales-Pina et al (2003) [97]Rats12:1224hDorsal RapheHigher during DP, lower during LP
Azekawa et al (1991) [71]Rats7h–19h24hPineal glandPeak at DP onset followed by strong decrease and then a gradual increase until the end of DP. Lower levels during LP
Nakayama et al (1993) [56]Rats8h–20h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during LP
Nakayama et al (2002) [93]Rats8h–20h24hMedial Prefrontal CortexHigher during DP, lower during LP

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: 5-HIAA: 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; L/D Cycle: Light-Dark Cycle; LP: Light Phase; DP: Dark Phase; SCN: Suprachiasmatic Nucleus; CTL: Control, SHR: Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats; CHR–R1: Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor 1.

Table 5

Circadian rhythms in noradrenaline levels.

Noradrenaline-Circadian Rhythms
Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain RegionNoradrenaline Levels
Barbier et al (2007) [55]Rats6h–18h20hPrefrontal CortexHigher during DP, stable during LP
Dugovic et al (2009) [54]Rats6h–18h6hPrefrontal CortexHigher during DP, stable during LP
Robinson et al (1991) [57]Sheepnatural20hPreoptic AreaDecrease gradually
Alfinito et al (2009) [58]Rats12:1212h30Preoptic AreaHigher during DP, stable during LP
Mitome et al (1994) a [37]Rats6h–18h52hParaventricular NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Stanley et al (1989) b [98]Rats9h–21h48hParaventricular NucleusPeak 1h after DP onset, followed by sudden decrease, until a second smaller peak at 3h before LP. Lower levels during LP
Mitome et al (1994) b [99]Rats6h–18h54hParaventricular NucleusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Morien et al (1995) A [100]*Rats7h–19h24hParaventricular NucleusPeak 1h and 8h after DP onset. Higher during DP, lower during LP
Smriga et al (2000) b [101]Rats7h–19h24hLateral HypothalamusGradual increase from baseline during LP Peak at DP onset followed by sudden decrease and return to baseline
Smriga et al (2000) a [102]Rats7h–19h26hVentral HypothalamusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Kalen et al (1989) [82]Rats12:1224hCaudal HippocampusHigher during DP, lower during LP
Drijfhout et al (1996) [103]Rats6h–18h16hPineal glandPeak 1–3h after DP onset, decrease 2h before LP Higher during DP, lower during LP
Morien et al (1995) B [100]*Rats7h–19h24hSeptal Nuclei and the Ventromedial ThalamusStable

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals. *These studies provided average monoamine concentrations pooled for several brain regions.

Abbreviations: L/D Cycle: Light-Dark Cycle; LP: Light Phase; DP: Dark phase.

Table 6

Circadian rhythms in adrenaline levels.

Adrenaline-Circadian Rhythms
Reference_IDAnimalsL/D CycleDurationBrain RegionAdrenaline Levels
Robinson et al (1991) [57]SheepNatural cycle20hPreoptic AreaStable

[i] Abbreviations: L/D Cycle: Light/Dark Cycle; DP: Dark-Phase; LP: Light-Phase.

Table 7

Dopamine levels during naturally occurring sleep stages.

Dopamine-Sleep
ReferenceAnimalsL/D CycleBrain RegionDopamine Levels
Orosco et al (1995) [104]Rats6h–18hPVN/VMN2 days measurement with different observation Day1: W and REM high, SWS lower/ Day2: W and REM low with SWS high
Nicolaidis et al (2001) A [105]Rats?PVN/VMNLevels increases from SWS to REM and from REM to W. Levels decreases from W to SWS
Shouse et al (2000) a 1 [106]Cats?AmygdalaStable during all stages (AW, QW, SWS and REM)
Shouse et al (2001) a 1 [107]Cats?AmygdalaStable during wake and sleep
Shouse et al (2001) b 1 [108]Cats?AmygdalaStable during wake and sleep
Shouse et al (2000) a 2 [106]Cats?Locus CoeruleusStable during all stages (AW, QW, SWS and REM)
Shouse et al (2001) a 1 [107]Cats?Locus CoeruleusStable during wake and sleep
Shouse et al (2001) b 2 [108]Cats?Locus CoeruleusStable during wake and sleep
Lena et al (2005) 1 [109]Rats8h–20hMedial Prefrontal CortexW: high level, SWS: low level, REM: in between
De Saint Hilaire (2000) [110]Rats6h–18hPrefrontal CortexW: lower, SWS: high. Higher in REM when followed by W
Nicolaidis et al (2001) B [105]Rats?Prefrontal CortexW to SWS: decrease, SWS to W: increases
Lena et al (2005) 2 [109]Rats8h–20hNucleus AccumbensW and REM: high, SWS: low

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: W: Wake; SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movements Sleep; PVN: Paraventricular Nucleus; VMN: Ventromedial Hypothalamic Nucleus.

Table 8

DOPAC levels during naturally occurring sleep stages.

DOPAC-Sleep
ReferenceAnimalsL/D CycleBrain RegionDOPAC Levels
De Saint Hilaire (2000) [110]Rats6h–18hPrefrontal CortexStable
Orosco et al (1995) [104]Rats6h–18hPVN/VMNW: low, SWS: intermediate, REM: high
Nicolaidis et al (2001) A [105]Rats?PVN/VMNFrom SWS to W: decrease, from SWS to REM: increase, from REM to W: increase

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: DOPAC: 3,4–Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; W: Wake; SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movements Sleep; PVN: Paraventricular Nucleus; VMN: Ventromedial Hypothalamic Nucleus.

Table 9

Serotonin levels during naturally occurring sleep stages.

Serotonin-Sleep
ReferenceAnimalsL/D CycleBrain RegionSerotonin Levels
Orosco et al (1995) [104]Rats6h–18hPVN/VMNW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Nicolaidis et al (2001) A [105]Rats?PVN/VMNW: high, SWS: low
Wilkinson et al (1991) [111]Cats?Preoptic Area/Anterior HypothalamusW: high, SWS: low
Python et al (2001) [112]Rats8h–20hPreoptic AreaW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low. SWS after REM showed no strong fluctuation, but when W after REM levels showed a strong increase
Shouse et al (2000) a 1 [106]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2001)a 1 [107]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: low
Shouse et al (2001) b 1 [108]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2000) a 2 [106]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2001) a 2 [107]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, SWS: low
Shouse et al (2001) b 1 [108]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Park et al (1999) [113]Rats7h–19hPosterior HippocampusW: high, SWS and REM: low
Gronli et al (2007) [114]Rats7h–19hHippocampusW and SWS: high, REM: low
Bjorvatn et al (2002) A1 [115]Rats6h–18hVentral HippocampusW: high, Sleep: low
Penalva et al (2003) A [116]Rats7h30–19h30Dorsal HippocampusW: high, SWS: low, REM: low
Fiske et al (2006) 1 [117]Rats6h–18hDorsal RapheW: high, SWS and REM: low
Fiske et al (2008) 1 [118]Rats6h–18hDorsal RapheW: high, SWS and REM: low
Portas et al (1994) [119]CatsConstant lightDorsal RapheW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Portas et al (1996) [120]CatsConstant lightDorsal RapheW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Portas et al (1998) 1 [121]Rats6h–18hDorsal RapheW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
De Saint Hilaire et al (2000) [110]Rats6h–18hPrefrontal CortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low. Except, 5–HT increases in REM if followed by W
Nicolaidis et al (2001) B [105]Rats?Prefrontal CortexW increases before a SWS stage. From SWS to W decrease after a long SWS period.
Portas et al (1998) 2 [121]Rats6h–18hFrontal cortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Mukaida et al (2007) [122] ƗRats7h–19hFrontal cortexW: high, SWS: lower
Fiske et al (2008) 2 [118]Rats6h–18hFrontal cortexStable
Bjorvatn et al (2002) A2 [115]Rats6h–18hFrontal cortexW: high, Sleep: low
Zeitzer et al (2002) [41]HumanL/D cycle of the seasonLateral VentricleW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low From stage 2 to REM: decrease/from REM to stage 2: increase
McCarley et al (2004) [123]??PPTW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Strecker et al (1999) [124]Cats?PPTW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Fiske et al (2006) 2 [117]Rats6h–18hFrontal cortexW: high, SWS: low, REM: intermediate
Lapierre et al (2012) [125]Seals?CortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Lapierre et al (2013) a [126]Seals8h–20hCerebral cortexW: high, BSWS: the lowest, REM: low
Lyamin et al (2016) A [127]*Seals8h–20hOccipital cortex and Frontal cortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low. Same decrease was seen in seals specific sleep stages (USWS (right and left), BSWS)
Blanco-Centurion et al (2001) A [128]Rats8h–20hGigantocellular reticular nucleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Iwakiri et al (1993) [129]Cats?Medial Pontine Reticular FormationW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Lyamin et al (2016) C [127]Seals8h–20hThalamusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Lyamin et al (2016) D [127]Seals8h–20hCaudate nucleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals. Ɨ Anaesthesia was applied during baseline: 6 L/min mixture of 25% oxygen and75% nitrogen. All the other studies measured natural sleep. *These studies provided average monoamine concentrations pooled for several brain regions.

Abbreviations: W: Wake; SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movements Sleep; PVN: Paraventricular Nucleus; VMN: Ventromedial Hypothalamic Nucleus; PPT: Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus.

Table 10

5-HIAA levels during naturally occurring sleep stages.

5-HIAA-Sleep
ReferenceAnimalsL/D CycleBrain Region5-HIAA Levels
De Saint Hilaire (2000) [110]Rats6h–18hPrefrontal CortexStable
Orosco et al (1995) [104]Rats6h–18hPVN/VMN1st day: W: intermediate, SWS: low, REM: high 2nd day: W: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Nicolaidis et al (2001) A [105]Rats?PVN/VMNW: High, Sleep: Lower. W is lower if preceded by REM.
Portas et al (1994) [119]CatsConstant lightDorsal RapheStable
Iwakiri et al (1993) [129]Cats?Medial Pontine Reticular FormationStable

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: 5-HIAA: 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; W: Wake; SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movements Sleep; PVN: Paraventricular Nucleus; VMN: Ventromedial Hypothalamic Nucleus.

Table 11

Noradrenaline levels during naturally occurring sleep stages.

Noradrenaline-Sleep
ReferenceAnimalsL/D CycleBrain RegionNoradrenaline Levels
Orosco et al (1995) [104]Rats6h–18hPVN/VMN1st day: W: high, SWS: low, REM: intermediate 2nd day W: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Nicolaidis et al (2001) A [105]Rats?PVN/VMNW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low. If SWS followed by W or REM: increase, while if REM or W is followed by SWS: decrease
Lyamin et al (2016) B [127]Seals8h–20hHypothalamusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2000) a 1 [106]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2000) b 1 [130]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: low
Shouse et al (2001) a 1 [107]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: low
Shouse et al (2001) b 1 [108]Cats?AmygdalaW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Park et al (2002) [131]Rats7h–19hAmygdalaW: high, SWS: low, REM: lower
Shouse et al (2000) a 2 [106]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Shouse et al (2000) b 2 [130]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, Sleep: low
Shouse et al (2001) a 2 [107]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, Sleep: low
Shouse et al (2001) b 2 [108]Cats?Locus CoeruleusW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Bellesi et al (2016) A1Mice8h–20hMedial Prefrontal CortexW: high, Sleep: low
Lena et al (2005) 1 [109]Rats8h–20hMedial Prefrontal CortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
De Saint Hilaire et al (2000) [110]Rats6h–18hPrefrontal CortexW: lower, SWS: high (relatively stable)
Lena et al (2005) 2 [109]Rats8h–20hNucleus AccumbensW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low
Lapierre et al (2013) b [132]Seals?CortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low.
Lyamin et al (2016) A [127]*Seals8h–20hOccipital cortex, frontal cortexW: high, SWS: intermediate, REM: low. Same decrease was seen in seals specific sleep stages (USWS (right and left), BSWS)
Bellesi et al (2016) A2Mice8h–20hM1W: high, Sleep: low

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Fluctuations are described as “higher” and “lower” disregarding actual magnitudes of changes. Rows are sorted by brain region. Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals. * These studies provided average monoamine concentrations pooled for several brain regions.

Abbreviations: W: Wake; SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movements Sleep; PVN: Paraventricular Nucleus; VMN: Ventromedial Hypothalamic Nucleus; M1: Primary Motor Cortex.

Table 12

Dopamine and sleep deprivation.

Dopamine-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain RegionDopamine levels during/after SD
Murillo-Rodriguez et al (2016) [134]Rats-Stroking fur with paint brush -Light noise in the cage -Tapping -Placing object in the cage6hNucleus AccumbensIncrease after SD

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Abbreviation: SD: Sleep Deprivation.

Table 13

DOPAC and sleep deprivation.

DOPAC-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain RegionDOPAC levels during/after SD
Zant et al (2010) [135]RatsGentle handling6hBasal ForebrainIncrease during SD, decrease to baseline levels during sleep recovery
Zant et al (2011) [136]Rats-Gentle handling including placing objects in the cage6hBasal ForebrainIncrease during 3 first hours of SD, then plateau. It decreases to baseline levels during sleep recovery

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results.

Abbreviations: DOPAC: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; SD: Sleep Deprivation.

Table 14

Serotonin and sleep deprivation.

Serotonin-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain RegionSerotonin levels during/after SD
Bjorvatn et al (2002) B1 [115]Rats-Gentle sensory stimulation (knocking on the plexiglas door, opening the door, gentle handling)8h30Ventral hippocampusDecrease during SD
Lopez-Rodriguez et al (2003) a [80]RatsModified disk-over-water24hPosterior HippocampusIncrease during SD and remain high during recovery
Lopez-Rodriguez et al (2003) b [133]RatsSmall platform (6cm) in tank filled with water (REM deprivation)24h but measurement for 11hPosterior HippocampusIncrease during SD and decrease below baseline during recovery
Penalva et al (2003) B [116]Rats-Introducing or removing objects -Shaking the cage slightly4hDorsal hippocampusIncrease during SD. During recovery time, levels are high during W and low during REM sleep.
Penalva et al (2003) C [116]Rats-Introducing or removing objects -Shaking the cage slightly4hDorsal hippocampusIncrease during SD. During recovery time, levels are high during W and low during REM sleep.
Bjorvatn et al (2002) B2 [115]Rats-Gentle sensory stimulation (knocking on the plexiglas door, opening the door, handling)8h30Frontal CortexDecrease during SD
Blanco-Centurion et al (2001) B [128]RatsPlatform (6.5cm) surrounded by water (REM deprivation)92hGigantoreticular Cellular NucleusDecrease (factor 100) during SD and remain low during recovery
Grossman et al (2000) B [75]Hamsters-Continuous gentle handling -Light puffs of air3h (red dim light)Lateral Margin of SCNIncrease during SD, decreases during recovery but slight increase at the end.
Grossman et al (2000) C [75]Hamsters-Continuous handling-Light puffs of air3hLateral Margin of SCNIncrease during SD, highest peak at the end of SD. Decreases to baseline levels during recovery
Murillo-Rodriguez et al (2016) [134]Rats-Stroking fur with paint brush-Light noise in the cage-Tapping-Placing object in the cage6hNucleus AccumbensIncrease after SD

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Rows are sorted by brain region.

Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: SD: Sleep Deprivation; SCN: Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.

Table 15

5-HIAA and sleep deprivation.

5-HIAA-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain Region5-HIAA levels during/after SD
Zant et al (2010) [135]RatsGentle handling6hBasal ForebrainIncrease during SD and return to baseline level during recovery
Zant et al (2011) [136]Rats-Gentle handling -Placing object in the cage6hBasal ForebrainIncrease during SD and return to baseline level during recovery
Blanco-Centurion et al (2001) B [128]RatsPlatform (6.5cm) surrounded by water (REM deprivation)92hGigantoreticular Cellular NucleusDecrease during SD, and increase during recovery

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Rows are sorted by brain region.

Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: SD: Sleep Deprivation; 5-HIAA: 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid.

Table 16

Noradrenaline and sleep deprivation.

Noradrenaline-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain RegionNoradrenaline levels during/after SD
Bellesi et al (2016) B1Mice-Exposure to novel objects6hMedial Prefrontal CortexIncrease during SD and slightly decrease at the end
Bellesi et al (2016) B2Mice-Exposure to novel objects6hM1Increase during SD
Murillo-Rodriguez et al (2016) [134]Rats-Stroking fur with paint brush -Light noise in the cage-Tapping-Placing object in the cage6hNucleus AccumbensIncrease after SD

[i] Each row represents one study (i.e. an experimental group within a publication) and a qualitative description of the results. Rows are sorted by brain region.

Lower case letters indicate separate publications from the same authors in the same year; upper cases letters represent separate groups within publications; numbers represent separate brain regions within animals.

Abbreviations: SD: Sleep Deprivation; M1: Primary Motor Cortex.

Table 17

Adrenaline and sleep deprivation.

Adrenaline-SD
Reference_IDAnimalsSD MethodsDurationBrain RegionAdrenaline levels during/after SD
Murillo-Rodriguez et al (2016) [134]Rats-Stroking fur with painting brush-Light noise during the cage-Tapping-Placing object in the cage6hNucleus AccumbensIncrease after SD

[i] Abbreviations: SD: Sleep Deprivation.

jcr-17-174-g2.png
Figure 2

Network meta-analysis comparing serotonin levels during wakefulness, SWS and REM sleep.

This plot summarises the results of 26 studies; 19 had data for each stage, 7 had data only for wakefulness and SWS. For the overall effect, p < 0.0001. The analysis shows significant heterogeneity; Τ² = 0.0059; I² = 98.4%.

Abbreviations: SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movement sleep.

jcr-17-174-g3.png
Figure 3

Network meta-analysis of noradrenaline levels during wakefulness, SWS and REM sleep.

This plot summarises the results of 13 studies; 8 had data for each stage, 5 had data only for wakefulness and SWS. For the overall effect p < 0.0001. The analysis shows significant heterogeneity; Τ² = 0.7835; I² = 99.5%.

Abbreviations: SWS: Slow Wave Sleep; REM: Rapid Eye Movement sleep.

Table 18

Summary of medians, interquartile ranges and Friedman’s ANOVA test statistics for each compound analysed during the different phases of the experiment.

AnalytePhaseMedian (nmol/L)IQR 25%IQR 75%Test statistics
5-HTLight1.561.176.88χ2(3) = 5.694 p = 0.127
Dark0.920.612.21
SD0.960.371.67
Recovery1.190.444.60
5-HIAALight86.6761.2160.71χ2(3) = 6.60 p = 0.086
Dark42.5620.8098.86
SD103.3272.6855.56
Recovery104.0786.4633.14
5-HTPLight2.170.352.21χ2(3) = 4.92 p = 0.178
Dark1.570.241.45
SD2.430.460.95
Recovery1.200.891.23
DALight0.490.190.15χ2(3) = 5.40 p = 0.145
Dark0.260.120.12
SD0.340.100.22
Recovery0.300.150.12
DOPACLight2.100.972.47χ2(3) = 8.846 p = 0.037
Dark1.700.673.35
SD2.060.844.70
Recovery1.330.361.36
NALight0.280.141.00χ2(3) = 7.145 p = 0.067
Dark0.470.3000.38
SD0.310.190.44
Recovery0.110.010.09
ADRELight0.180.060.04χ2(3) = 1.8 p = 0.615
Dark0.210.100.06
SD0.280.140.15
Recovery0.230.110.09

[i] Friedman’s ANOVA’s were performed to compare concentrations (nmol/L) between the different phases. For 5-HT, light phase n = 7, dark phase and SD n = 8, and recovery n = 9. For 5-HIAA, light phase, dark phase, and SD n = 11, recovery n = 10. For 5-HTP, light phase n = 9, dark phase, SD, and recovery n = 8. For dopamine, all phases n = 11. For DOPAC, light phase and recovery n = 9, dark phase n = 7, SD n = 8. For noradrenaline, all phase n = 11. For adrenaline, light phase, SD and recovery n = 10, dark phase n = 9. Numbers of observations vary because of missing samples (temporarily obstructed flow) and some concentrations being below HPLC detection limits.

Abbreviations: 5-HT: Serotonin; 5-HIAA: 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid; 5-HTP: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; DA: Dopamine; DOPAC: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; NA: Noradrenaline; ADRE: Adrenaline; IQR: Inter Quartile Range.

jcr-17-174-g4.png
Figure 4

Median DOPAC dialysates concentrations in (nM) ± inter quartile range.

Light: 12h of baseline during the light phase; dark: 12h of baseline during the dark phase; SD: 12h of sleep deprivation during the light phase and rec: recovery for 12h. *Wilcoxon signed rank test: T = 0, p = 0.018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcr.174 | Journal eISSN: 1740-3391
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 16, 2018
Published on: Jan 14, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Julia M. L. Menon, Christ Nolten, E. J. Marijke Achterberg, Ruud N. J. M. A. Joosten, Maurice Dematteis, Matthijs G. P. Feenstra, W. H. (Pim) Drinkenburg, Cathalijn H. C. Leenaars, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.