Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting Future Condition and Conservation Costs from Modelling Improvements to the Indoor Environment: The Monumental Munch-Paintings in the University of Oslo’s Aula Assembly Hall Cover

Predicting Future Condition and Conservation Costs from Modelling Improvements to the Indoor Environment: The Monumental Munch-Paintings in the University of Oslo’s Aula Assembly Hall

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Anaf, W, Bencs, L, Van Grieken, R, Janssens, K and DeWael, K. 2015. Indoor particulate matter in four Belgian heritage sites: Case studies on the deposition of dark-colored and hygroscopic particles. Science of the Total Environment, 506–507: 361–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.018
  2. Appelbaum, B. 2013. Conservation in the 21st Century: Will a 20th Century Code of Ethics Suffice? In: Hatchfield, P. (ed.) Ethics and Critical Thinking in Conservation. Washington, D.C.: AIC. pp. 1–10.
  3. Berman, P, Pettersen, P and Ydstie, I. 2011. Introduction. In: Munch’s Laboratory. The Path to the Aula. Oslo: The Munch Museum. pp. 17–21.
  4. Brokerhof, A, Ankersmit, B and Ligterink, F. 2017. Risk management for collections. Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands. Available at https://cultureelerfgoed.nl/sites/default/files/publications/risk-management-for-collections_a.pdf [Last accessed 19 February 2019].
  5. Cano-Ruiz, JA, Kong, D, Balas, RB and Nazaroff, WW. 1993. Removal of reactive gases at indoor surfaces. Combining mass transport and surface kinetics. Atmospheric Environment, 27A(13): 2039–2050. DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(93)90276-5
  6. Caple, C. (ed.) 2012. Preventive Conservation in Museums. London: Routledge.
  7. Cultural Heritage Agency, Netherlands. 2014. Assessing Museum Collections – Collection valuation in six steps. Amersfoort: Cultural Heritage Agency. Available at https://cultureelerfgoed.nl/sites/default/files/publications/assessing-museum-collections.pdf [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  8. Daher, N, Ruprecht, A, Invernizzi, G, De Marco, C, Miller-Schulze, J, Heo, JB, Shafer, MM, Schauer, JJ and Sioutas, C. 2011. Coarse Particulate Matter Inside the Refectory of Santa Maria Delle Grazie Church, Home of Leonardo Da Vinci’s “Last Supper”. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45: 10344–10353. DOI: 10.1021/es202736a
  9. Dahlin, E, Grøntoft, T, Wittstadt, K, Drda-Kühn, K, Colombini, MP, Bonaduce, I, Vandenabeele, P, Larsen, R, Potthast, A, Marincas, O, Schieweck, A, Thicket, D, Odlyha, M, Andrade, G, Hackney, S, McDonagh, C and Ackerman, JJ. 2013b. Measurement, Effect Assessment and Mitigation of Pollutant Impact on Movable Cultural Assets – Innovative Research for Market Transfer. EU project MEMORI. Grant agreement no. 265132. Final Project Report. NILU OR 15/2014. pp. 12–26. Available at http://www.memori.fraunhofer.de/714.html [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  10. Dahlin, E, Taylor, J, Winness, M and Grøntoft, T. 2013a. Fysisk bevaring av kulturminner – kunnskapsbehov mot 2020. NILU OR 02/2013. Kjeller, Norway. pp. 23–29. Available at https://www.nilu.no/apub/27034/ (In Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  11. de Bock, LA, van Grieken, R, Camuffo, D and Grime, WG. 1996. Microanalysis of Museum Aerosols To Elucidate the Soiling of Paintings: Case of the Correr Museum, Venice, Italy. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30: 3341–3350. DOI: 10.1021/es9602004
  12. EnvCul. 2017. Condition model for cultural heritage, © Norwegian Institute for Air research. Available at http://envcul.nilu.no/ [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  13. Frøysaker, T. 2007. The paintings of Edvard Munch in the Assembly Hall of Oslo University. Their treatment history and the Aula-project. Restauro. Forum für Restauratoren, Konservatoren und Denkmalpfleger, 113(4): 246–257.
  14. Frøysaker, T. 2008. Konserveringsstudiets Aulaprosjekt. Norske Konserves 1. pp. 7–9. Available at https://www.hf.uio.no/iakh/english/research/projects/aula-project/pictures/Konserves.pdf (In Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  15. Frøysaker, T. 2015. Unintended contamination? A selection of Munch’s paintings with non-original zinc white. In: Frøysaker, T, Streeton, NLW, Kutzke, H, Hanssen-Bauer, F and Topolova-Casadiego, B (eds.), Public Paintings by Edvard Munch and His Contemporaries. Change and Conservation Challenges. London: Archetype Publications. pp. 132–140.
  16. Frøysaker, T. 2016. Munch’s ambivalence to Alma Mater – making, changes and challenges. Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, 2: 338–350. ISSN 0931-7198.
  17. Frøysaker, T. 2017. Fortiden forandrer seg ikke, men maleriene til Munch gjør. Faglig pedagogisk dag 2017, University of Oslo. Powerpoint presentation.
  18. Frøysaker, T, Miliani, C, Grøntoft, T and Kleiva, I. 2015. Monitoring of surface blackening and zinc reaction products on prepared samples located adjacent to Munch’s The Source in the Aula at the University of Oslo. In: Frøysaker, T, Streeton, NLW, Kutzke, H, Hanssen-Bauer, F and Topolova-Casadiego, B (eds.). Public Paintings by Edvard Munch and His Contemporaries. Change and Conservation Challenges. London: Archetype Publications. pp. 126–131.
  19. Frøysaker, T, Miliani, C and Liu, M. 2011. Non-invasive evaluation of cleaning tests performed on Chemistry (1909–1910). A large unvarnished oil painting on canvas by Edvard Munch. Restauro, 4: 53–63. Available at https://www.hf.uio.no/iakh/english/research/projects/aula-project/pictures/restauro4_2011.pdf [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  20. Gierløff, CW, Magnussen, K, Eide, LS, Iversen, EK, Ibenholt, K, Dombu, SV, Navrud, S and Strand, J. 2017. The value of cultural heritage. An economic analysis of cultural heritage and cultural environment. Menon publication no. 72/2017. Full report. Available at https://www.riksantikvaren.no/Aktuelt/Nyheter/Verdien-av-kulturarv (in Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 March 2019]. English summary available at https://www.riksantikvaren.no/en/Topics/International-activities/International-Project-News/The-value-of-cultural-heritage [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  21. Graedel, TE and Leygraf, C. 2000. Atmospheric Corrosion, Electrochemical Society Series. New York: John Wiley and Sons. p. 824.
  22. Grau-Bove, J and Strlič, M. 2013. Fine particulate matter in indoor cultural heritage: a literature review. Heritage Science, 1: 8. DOI: 10.1186/2050-7445-1-8
  23. Grøntoft, T. 2004. Deposition of gaseous pollutants to indoor material surfaces. Time, humidity and temperature dependent deposition of O3, NO2 and SO2. Measurement and modelling. Thesis (PhD), Department of Chemistry. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. University of Oslo. No. 324. Unipub AS, Oslo.
  24. Grøntoft, T. 2015. A condition modelling tool for cultural heritage objects. International Journal of Conservation Science, 6(4): 643–656. Available at http://ijcs.uaic.ro/public/IJCS-15-46_Grontoft.pdf [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  25. Grøntoft, T. 2016. NILU-målinger i programmet ECE-ICP-materialer, 1987–2011. Måleresultater og trender for NILU-stasjonene i måleprogrammet ECE ICP-materialer under konvensjonen for langtransporterte luftforurensninger(CLRTAP), 1987–2011. NILU report 18/2016. pp. 13–29. (In Norwegian).
  26. Grøntoft, T, Odlyha, M, Mottner, P, Dahlin, E, Lopez-Aparicio, S, Jakiela, S, Scharff, M, Andrade, G, Obarzanowski, M, Ryhl-Svendsen, M, Thickett, D, Hackney, S and Wadum, J. 2010. Pollution monitoring by dosimetry and passive diffusion sampling for evaluation of environmental conditions for paintings in microclimate frames. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(4): 411–419. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.02.004
  27. Grøntoft, T and Raychaudhuri, MR. 2004. Compilation of tables of surface deposition velocities for O3, NO2 and SO2 to a range of indoor surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 38(4): 533–544. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.010
  28. Grøntoft, T, Thickett, D, Lankester, P, Hackney, S, Townsend, JH, Ramsholt, K and Garrido, M. 2016. Assessment of indoor air quality and risk for damage to cultural heritage objects with MEMORI® dosimetry. Issue sup1, The Indoor Environment. Studies in Conservation, 61: 70–82. DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2015.1131477
  29. Hanssen-Bauer, I, Førland, EJ, Haddeland, I, Hisdal, H, Mayer, S, Nesje, A, Nilsen, JEØ, Sandven, S, Sandø, AB, Sorteberg, A and Ådlandsvik, B. (eds.) 2015. Klima i Norge 2100, Kunnskapsgrunnlag for klimatilpasning oppdatert i 2015. M-406 | 2015. NCCS report no. 2/2015. pp. 90–115. Available at http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/Documents/publikasjoner/M406/M406.pdf (In Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  30. Huijbregts, Z, Kramer, RP, Martens, MHJ, van Schijndel, AWM and Schellen, HL. 2012. A proposed method to assess the damage risk of future climate change to museum objects in historic buildings. Building and Environment, 55: 43–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.008
  31. Hutchings, J and Ashley-Smith, J. 2008. Using Survival Analysis on Conservation Metadata to Benchmark Treatment Frequency. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 1(2): 9–18. DOI: 10.1145/1434763.1434766
  32. Larssen, S and Hoem, K. 1990. Overvåkning av luftkonsentrasjoner fra biltrafikk 1989. Målinger i Oslo 1980–89. NILU rapport 58/90, O-8413: 34–72, Available at https://www.nb.no/items/URN:NBN:no-nb_digibok_2009071000069?page=39 (In Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 march 2019].
  33. Lindberg, W. 1968. Den alminnelige luftforurensningen i Norge. Røykskaderådet, pp. 9–23. (In Norwegian).
  34. Lithgow, K and Lloyd, H. 2017. Direct preventive conservation – Using information from the past to prevent small issues in the present from becoming bigger problems in the future. In: Bridgland, J. ICOM-CC 18th Triennial Conference Preprints, Copenhagen, 4–8 September 2017. Paris: International Council of Museums. Available at http://icom-cc-publications-online.org/PublicationDetail.aspx?cid=3e505f9c-d1fb-4c48-b8a3-565f2833948a [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  35. Lithgow, K, Lloyd, H, Brimblecombe, P, Yoon, YH and Thickett, D. 2005. Managing dust in historic houses – a visitor/conservator interface. In Sourbès-Verger, I. (ed.), ICOM Committee for Conservation, 14th Triennial Meeting, the Hague, 12–16 September 2005: preprints, vol. II, London: James & James, 2005, pp. 662–669.
  36. Lloyd, H, Bendix, C, Brimblecombe, P and Thickett, D. 2007. Dust in historic libraries, In: Padfield, T and Borchersen, K (eds.), Museum microclimates, The National Museum of Denmark, Contributions to the Copenhagen conference, 19–23 November, pp. 135–144. Available at https://www.conservationphysics.org/mm/musmic/musmic150.pdf [Last accessed 20 February 2019].
  37. Lloyd, H, Brimblecombe, P and Lithgow, K. 2007. Economics of Dust. Studies in Conservation, 52(2): 135–146, DOI: 10.1179/sic.2007.52.2.135
  38. Luftkvalitet.info. 2018. Available at http://www.luftkvalitet.info/Libraries/Rapporter/oslo_historisk.sflb.ashx (In Norwegian) [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  39. MAP. 2017. The Munch Aula Paintings project. University of Oslo, Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History, Research project. Available at https://www.hf.uio.no/iakh/english/research/projects/aula-project/index.html [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  40. Mecklenburg, MF, Charola, AE and Koestler, RJ (eds.). 2010. New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings, Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute, Washington, D.C., USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
  41. MEMORI. 2013a. The MEMORI technology, Innovation for conservation. Available at http://memori.nilu.no [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  42. MEMORI. 2013b. EU research project: Measurement, Effect Assessment and Mitigation of Pollutant Impact on Movable Cultural Assets. Innovative Research for Market Transfer. Available at http://www.memori.fraunhofer.de/memori.html [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  43. Michalski, S and Pedersoli, JL. 2016. The ABC Method: a risk management approach to the preservation of cultural heritage. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute. Available at https://www.iccrom.org/publication/abc-method-risk-management-approach-preservation-cultural-heritage [Last accessed 19 February 2019].
  44. Naverud, S and Ready, RC. 2002. Valuing Cultural Heritage. Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781843765455
  45. Nazaroff, WW, Ligocki, MP, Salmon, LG, Cass, GR, Fall, T, Jones, MC, Liu, HIH and Ma, T. 1993. Airborne Particles in Museums. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
  46. Ormsby, B and Learner, T. 2016. Recent Developments in the Cleaning of Modern Paints. Conservation perspectives, Fall 2016, Conserving modern paints. Los Angeles, CA, USA: The Getty Conservation Institute. Available at http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/newsletters/31_2/feature.html [Last accessed 20 February 2019].
  47. Rosenberg, E, De Santis, F, Kontozova-Deutsch, V, Odlyha, M, van Grieken, R and Vichi, F. 2015. Measuring Gaseous and Particulate Pollutants: Instruments and Instrumental Methods. In: Camuffo, D, et al. Basic Environmental Mechanisms Affecting Cultural Heritage, Understanding Deterioration Mechanisms for Conservation Purposes. Firenze: Nardini Editore, pp. 115–146.
  48. Russell, R and Winkworth, K. 2009. Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections, 2nd ed. Collections Council of Australia. Available at https://www.arts.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1761/f/significance-2.0.pdf [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  49. Sabbioni, C, Brimblecombe, P and Cassar, M. (eds.) 2010. The Atlas of Climate Change Impact on European Cultural. Heritage: Scientific Analysis and Management Strategies. London/New York: Anthem Press. pp. 4–9.
  50. Scharffenberg, K. 2014. Investigations of Tide-Lines on Edvard Munch’s Painting ‘The Source’, Unpublished thesis (MA), Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History, University of Oslo.
  51. Scharffenberg, K. 2015. Investigations of a tide-line and its influences on the painting materials in The Source. In: Frøysaker, T, Streeton, NLW, Kutzke, H, Hanssen-Bauer, F and Topolova-Casadiego, B (eds.), Public Paintings by Edvard Munch and His Contemporaries. Change and Conservation Challenges. London: Archetype Publications. pp. 117–125.
  52. Stoveland, LP, Stols-Witlox, M, Ormsby, B, Caruso, F and Frøysaker, T. 2019. (in press). ‘Edvard Munch’s monumental Aula paintings: a review of soiling and surface cleaning issues and the search for new solutions.’ In: Wright, A, Clarricoates, R and Dowding, H (eds.), Interactions of Water with Paintings. London: Archetype Publications.
  53. Strlič, M, Thickett, D, Taylor, J and Cassar, M. 2013. Damage functions in heritage science. Studies in Conservation, 58(2): 80–87. DOI: 10.1179/2047058412Y.0000000073
  54. Tétreault, J. 2003. Airborne pollutants in museums, galleries, and archives: Risk assessment, control strategies and preservation management. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
  55. Thomson, G. 1986. The Museum Environment. Second Edition. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  56. Tidblad, J, Kreislová, K, Faller, M, de la Fuente, D, Yates, T, Verney-Carron, A, Grøntoft, T, Gordon, A and Hans, U. 2017. ICP-materials Trends in Corrosion, Soiling and Air Pollution (1987–2014). Materials, 10(8): 969. DOI: 10.3390/ma10080969
  57. TNNI. 2018. The Norwegian Nobel Institute, Award ceremony. Available at https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/Events/Award-ceremony [Last accessed 24 October 2018].
  58. UiO. 2018. University of Oslo. Interior. Available at https://www.uio.no/english/about/culture/art/aula/pictures/ [Last accessed 1 March 2019].
  59. UNESCO. 1972. Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf [Last accessed 24 October 2018].
  60. Waller, RR. 2016. Risk Assessment and Assignment of Environment Parameters. In: Stauderman, S and Tompkins, WG (eds.), Proceedings of the Smithsonian Institution summit on the museum preservation environment. Washington, D.C., USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, pp. 33–41. Available at https://opensi.si.edu/index.php/smithsonian/catalog/book/111 [Last accessed 19 February 2019].
  61. Wilson, H and van Snick, S. 2017. The effectiveness of dust mitigation and cleaning strategies at The National Archives, UK. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 24: 100–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.09.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcms.185 | Journal eISSN: 1364-0429
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2018
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2019
Published on: Aug 13, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Terje Grøntoft, Lena Porsmo Stoveland, Tine Frøysaker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.