References
- 1Ainsworth, S, Oswald, A and Went, D. 2013.
Remotely acquired, not remotely sensed: using lidar as a field survey tool . In: Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC (eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation. AARG Occasional Paper. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 206–22. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dqdz.22 - 2Aldred, O. 2014. An Archaeology of Movement: a methodological study. PhD thesis. Reykjavík: University of Iceland.
- 3Bala, PS and Aghila, G. 2019.
Q-Genesis: Question Generation System Based on Semantic Relationships . In: Advances in Big Data and Cloud Computing. Springer. pp. 509–517. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1882-5_44 - 4Banaszek, Ł, Cowley, D and Middleton, M. 2018. Towards National Archaeological Mapping. Assessing Source Data and Methodology—A Case Study from Scotland, Geosciences, 8(272). DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8080272
- 5Bell, T and Lock, G. 2000.
Topographic and cultural influences on walking the Ridgeway in later prehistoric times . In: Lock, G (ed.), Beyond the Map. Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. NATO Science Series. Series A: Life Sciences. Amsterdam: IOS Press/Ohmsha. pp. 85–100. - 6Bell, T, Wilson, A and Wickham, A. 2002. Tracking the Samnites: Landscape and Communications Routes in the Sangro Valley, Italy. American Journal of Archaeology, 106(2): 69–186. DOI: 10.2307/4126242
- 7Bofinger, J and Hesse, R. 2011.
As far as the laser can reach… – Laminar analysis of LIDAR detected structures as a powerful instrument for archaeological heritage management in Baden-Württemberg, Germany . In: Cowley, D (ed.), Remote Sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. EAC Occasional Paper. Brussels: EAC. pp. 161–172. - 8Cameron, CM. 2013. How People Moved among Ancient Societies: Broadening the View, American Anthropologist, 115 (2): 218–231. DOI: 10.1111/aman.12005
- 9Chadwick, AM. 2007.
Trackways, hooves and memory-days–human and animal memories and movements around Iron Age and Romano-British rural landscapes . Prehistoric Journeys. Oxford: Oxbow. 131–152. - 10Chadwick, AM. 2016. Foot-fall and hoof-hit. Agencies, movements, materialities, and identities; and later prehistoric and Romano-British trackways, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(1): 93–120. DOI: 10.1017/S095977431500027X
- 11Chase, AF and Chase, DZ. 2001. Ancient Maya Causeways and Site Organization at Caracol, Belize, Ancient Mesoamerica, 12(2): 273–281. DOI: 10.1017/S0956536101121097
- 12Chase, AF, Chase, DZ, Weishampel, JF, Drake, JB, Shrestha, RL, Slatton, KC, Awe, JJ and Carter, WE. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2): 387–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.018
- 13CIDOC. 2015. Current Official Version of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. The version 6.2 of the reference model.
- 14Crozet, A, Laplaige, C and Rodier, X. 2017. Une approche multidisciplinaire de la fabrique des paysages dans la longue durée dans les forêts de Blois, Russy, Boulogne et Chambord (Loir-et-Cher). Projets de paysage, 16: 1–24.
- 15De Laet, V, Van Loon, G, Van der Perre, A, Deliever, I and Willems, H. 2015. Integrated remote sensing investigations of ancient quarries and road systems in the greater Dayr al-Barsha Region, Middle Egypt: A study of logistics. Journal of Archaeological Science, 55: 286–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.10.009
- 16Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, 24(3): 75–92. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1720.
- 17Erickson, CL and Walker, JH. 2009.
Precolumbian causeways and canals as landesque capital . In: Erickson, CL, Darling, JA and Snead, JE (eds.), Landscapes of movement. Trails, Paths, and Roads in Anthropological Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. pp. 232–252. - 18Fábrega-Álvarez, P. 2006. Moving without destination. A theoretical GIS–based determination of movement from a giving origin. Archaeological Computing Newsletter, 64: 7–11.
- 19Feinman, GM and Nicholas, LM. 2012.
Compact versus dispersed settlement in pre-Hispanic Mesoamerica: The role of neighborhood organization and collective action . In: Smith, ME (ed.), The neighborhood as a social and spatial unit in Mesoamerican cities. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press. pp. 132–155. - 20Fernandez-Diaz, J, Carter, W, Shrestha, R, & Glennie, C. 2014. Now you see it… now you don’t: Understanding airborne mapping LiDAR collection and data product generation for archaeological research in Mesoamerica. Remote Sensing, 6(10), 9951–10001. DOI: 10.3390/rs6109951
- 21Friedman, RA, Sofaer, A and Weiner, RS. 2017. Remote Sensing of Chaco Roads Revisited. Lidar Documentation of the Great North Road, Pueblo Alto Landscape, and Aztec Airport Mesa Road. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5(4): 365–381. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2017.25
- 22Fruchart, C. 2016. Utilisation de plans forestiers XVIIIe-XIXe siècles pour une étude archéologique des paysages passés de la forêt de Chailluz (Besançon): l’exemple d’un réseau viaire. Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre|BUCEMA, (Hors-série nº 9). DOI: 10.4000/cem.13789
- 23Gates, JE. 2006.
Hidden passage: Graeco-Roman roads in Egypt’s eastern desert . In: Robertson, EC, Seibert, JD, Fernandez, DC and Zender, MU (eds.), Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. Calgary: University of Calgary Press. pp. 315–322. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv6gqr9h.35 - 24Gibson, E. 2007. The Archaeology of Movement in a Mediterranean Landscape. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 20(1): 61–87. DOI: 10.1558/jmea.v20i1.61
- 25Güimil-Fariña, A and Parcero-Oubiña, C. 2015. “Dotting the joins”: a non-reconstructive use of Least Cost Paths to approach ancient roads. The case of the Roman roads in the NW Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Archaeological Science, 54: 31–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.030
- 26Hall, D. 2014. The open fields of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702955.001.0001
- 27Halliday, S. 2013.
I walked, I saw, I surveyed, but what did I see?… and what did I survey . In: Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC (eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation. AARG Occasional Paper. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 63–75. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dqdz.10 - 28Herzog, I. 2013. Theory and Practice of Cost Functions. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.), Fusion of Cultures. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. BAR International Series. Oxford:
Archaeopress . pp. 375–382. - 29Hesse, R. 2013. The changing picture of archaeological landscapes: lidar prospection over very large areas as part of a cultural heritage strategy. In Opitz, R and Cowley, D (eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications, pp. 171–183. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dqdz.19
- 30Hiebel, G, Doerr, M, Eide, Ø and Theodoridou, M. 2015. CRMgeo: a Spatiotemporal Model. An Extension of CIDOC CRM to link the CIDOC CRM to GeoSPARQL through a Spatiotemporal Refinement. Proposal for approval by CIDOC CRM-SIG (version 1.2). Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- 31Hodder, I. 1999. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
- 32Ingold, T. 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203818336
- 33Laligant, S. 2007.
Le labour et le détouré; derrière les techniques se cache la société (Damgan, Morbihan) . In: Bourrigaud, R and Sigaut, F (eds.), Nous labourons. Actes du colloque Technique de travail de la terre, hier et aujourd’hui, ici et là-bas. Nantes, Nozay, Châteaubriant 25–28 octobre 2006. Nantes: Éditions du Centre d’histoire du travail. pp. 117–132. - 34Laurence, R. 1999. The Roads of Roman Italy: Mobility and Cultural Change. London: Routledge.
- 35Lefebvre, H. 1974. La production de l’espace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos. DOI: 10.3406/homso.1974.1855
- 36Leturcq, S. 2008.
Fonction et devenir d’un réseau invisible: les crêtes de labours dans les terroirs beaucerons (XIVe–XXe siècles) . In: Compatangelo-Soussignan, R, Bertrand, J-R, Chapman, J and Laffont, P-Y (eds.), Marqueurs des paysages et systemes socio-economiques. 2008 Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. pp. 163–174. - 37Llobera, M. 1996. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity, 70(269): 612–622. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00083745
- 38Llobera, M. 2000.
Understanding movement: a pilot model towards the sociology of movement . In: Lock, G (ed.), Beyond the Map. Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. NATO Science Series. Series A: Life Sciences. Amsterdam: IOS Press/Ohmsha. pp. 66–84. - 39McCoy, MD and Ladefoged, TN. 2009. New developments in the use of spatial technology in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 17(3), 263–295. DOI: 10.1007/s10814-009-9030-1
- 40McOmish, D. 2011. Introductions to Heritage Assets: Field Systems. English Heritage, 1–5.
- 41Mlekuž, D. 2013.
Messy landscapes: lidar and the practices of landscaping . In: Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC (eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation. AARG Occasional Paper. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 88–99. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dqdz.12 - 42Mlekuž, D. 2014.
Exploring the topography of movement . In: Polla, S and Verhagen, P (eds.), Computational Approaches to the Study of Movement in Archaeology. Theory, Practice and Interpretation of Factors and Effects of Long Term Landscape Formation and Transformation. Topoi – Berlin Studies of the Ancient World/Topoi – Berliner Studien der Alten Welt. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 5–22. - 43Murrieta-Flores, P. 2014.
Developing computational approaches for the study of movement: assessing the role of visibility and landscape markers in terrestrial navigation during Iberian Late Prehistory . In: Polla, S and Verhagen, P (eds.), Computational Approaches to the Study of Movement in Archaeology. Theory, Practice and Interpretation of Factors and Effects of Long Term Landscape Formation and Transformation. Topoi – Berlin Studies of the Ancient World/Topoi – Berliner Studien der Alten Welt. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 99–132. - 44Nicolucci, F. 2017. Documenting archaeological science with CIDOC CRM. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(3): 223–231. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0199-x
- 45Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC (eds.). 2013. Interpreting archaeological topography. Airborne laser scanning, 3D data and ground observation. Occasional Publication of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
- 46Opitz, RS and Johnson, TD. 2016. Interpretation at the controller’s edge: Designing graphical user interfaces for the digital publication of the excavations at Gabii (Italy). Open Archaeology, 1(1): 274–290. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2015-0017
- 47Opitz, R and Limp, WF. 2015. Recent developments in high-density survey and measurement (HDSM) for archaeology: implications for practice and theory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44: 347–364. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013845
- 48Palmer, R. 2013.
Reading aerial images . In: Opitz, RS and Cowley, DC (eds.), Interpreting archaeological topography. 3D data, visualisation and observation. AARG Occasional Paper. Oxford: Oxbow Books. pp. 76–87. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dqdz.11 - 49Piana, P, Balzaretti, R, Moreno, D and Watkins, C. 2012. Topographical art and landscape history: Elizabeth Fanshawe (1779–1856) in early nineteenth-century Liguria. Landscape History, 33(2): 65–82. DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2012.739397
- 50Ricoeur, P. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
- 51Robin, C. 2002. Outside of houses: the practices of everyday life at Chan Nòohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology, 2(2): 245–268. DOI: 10.1177/14605302002002397
- 52Shaw, LC. 2012. The Elusive Maya Marketplace: An Archaeological Consideration of the Evidence. Journal of Archaeological Research, 20(2): 117–155. DOI: 10.1007/s10814-011-9055-0
- 53Sheth, A and Perry, M. 2008. Traveling the semantic web through space, time, and theme. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(2): 81–86. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2008.46
- 54Small, F. 2016. The lost Roman road from Chichester to Arundel. Historic England Research. Uncovering our urban wetlands, 4: 2–8.
https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/historic-england-research-4 . - 55Tolk, A and Muguira, JA. 2003.
The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model . In: 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, Florida, September 2003. Orlando: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization. - 56Trier, ØD, Zortea, M and Tonning, C. 2015. Automatic detection of mound structures in airborne laser scanning data. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2: 69–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.01.005
- 57van Lanen, RJ, Kosian, MC, Groenewoudt, BJ, Spek, T and Jansma, E. 2015. Best travel options: Modelling Roman and early-medieval routes in the Netherlands using a multi-proxy approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3: 144–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.05.024
- 58Verbrugghe, G, De Clercq, W and Van Eetvelde, V. 2017. Routes across the Civitas Menapiorum: using least cost paths and GIS to locate the Roman roads of Sandy Flanders. Journal of Historical Geography, 57: 76–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2017.06.006
- 59Verhagen, P and Jeneson, K. 2012.
A Roman Puzzle. Trying to Find the Via Belgica with GIS . In: Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta Flores, P and Papadopoulos, C (eds.), Thinking beyond the Tool: Archaeological Computing & the Interpretive Process. BAR International Series. Oxford: Archaeopress. pp. 123–130. - 60Verhagen, P, Nuninger, L and Groenhuijzen, MR. 2019.
Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches . In: Verhagen, P, Joyce, J and Groenhuijzen, MR (eds.), Finding the Limits of the Limes: Modelling Demography, Economy and Transport on the Edge of the Roman Empire. Cham: Springer. pp. 217–249. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04576-0_11 - 61Verschoof-van der Vaart, W and Lambers, K. 2019. Learning to Look at LiDAR: The Use of R-CNN in the Automated Detection of Archaeological Objects in LiDAR Data from the Netherlands. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 2(1): 31–40. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.32
- 62Vletter, WF. 2014. (Semi) automatic extraction from Airborne Laser Scan data of roads and paths in forested areas. In: Hadjimitsis, DG, Themistocleous, K, Michaelides, S and Papadavid, G (eds.), Proceedings of SPIE 2014. pp. 92291D–1. DOI: 10.1117/12.2069709
- 63Vletter, WF and van Lanen, RJ. 2018. Finding Vanished Routes: Applying a Multi-modelling Approach on Lost Route and Path Networks in the Veluwe Region, the Netherlands. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History, 5(1): 2. DOI: 10.16993/rl.35
- 64Whitley, TG and Hicks, LM. 2003. A geographic information systems approach to understanding potential prehistoric and historic travel corridors. Southeastern Archaeology, 22: 77–91.
- 65Whitley, TG, Moore, G, Goel, G and Jackson, D. 2010. Beyond the Marsh: Settlement Choice, Perception and Spatial Decision-Making on the Georgia Coastal Plain. In: Frischer, B, Webb Crawford, J and Koller, D (eds.), Making History Interactive. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22–26, 2009. Oxford:
Archaeopress . pp. 380–390. - 66Williamson, T. 2016. The ancient origins of medieval fields: A reassessment. Archaeological Journal, 173(2): 264–287. DOI: 10.1080/00665983.2016.1191129
- 67Zadora-Rio, E. 1991.
Les terroirs médiévaux dans le Nord et le Nord-Ouest de l’Europe . In: Guilaine, J (ed.), Pour une archéologie agraire: à la croisée des sciences de l’homme et de la nature. Paris: A. Colin. pp. 165–192. - 68Zakšek, K, Fovet, É, Nuninger, L and Pobodnikar, T. 2008. Path Modelling and Settlement Pattern. In: Posluschny, A, Lambers, K and Herzog, I (eds.), Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte. Bonn:
Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH . pp. 309–315.