Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Backbone Extraction in Archaeological Similarity Networks: Methodology and a Ceramic Case Study from the Amuq Valley Cover

Backbone Extraction in Archaeological Similarity Networks: Methodology and a Ceramic Case Study from the Amuq Valley

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Akar, M and Kara, D. 2018. ‘Into the Hinterland: The Middle Bronze Age Building at Toprakhisar Höyük, Altınözü (Hatay, Turkey)’. Adalya, 21: 81–116.
  2. Bailey, G. 2007. ‘Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2): 198–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002
  3. Bintliff, JL, Howard, P and Snodgrass, AM. 2007. Testing the Hinterland: The Work of the Boeotia Survey (1989–1991) in the Southern Approaches to the City of Thespiai. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
  4. Blair, EH. 2024. ‘Material Culture Similarity and Co-occurrence Networks’. In: Brughmans, T, Mills, BJ, Munson, J and Peeples, M (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Network Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854265.013.6
  5. Braidwood, RJ. 1937. Mounds in the Plain of Antioch: An Archaeological Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Brughmans, T, Collar, A and Coward, F. 2016. The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198748519.001.0001
  7. Brughmans, T, Mills, BJ, Munson, J and Peeples, M. (eds.) 2024. The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Network Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854265.001.0001
  8. Brughmans, T and Peeples, M. 2017. ‘Trends in archaeological network research: A bibliometric analysis’. Journal of Historical Network Research, 1: 1–24. DOI: 10.25517/jhnr.v1i1.10
  9. Brughmans, T and Peeples, MA. 2023. Network Science in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009170659
  10. Casana, J. 2009. ‘Alalakh and the archaeological landscape of Mukish: The political geography and population of a Late Bronze Age kingdom’. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 353: 7–37. DOI: 10.1086/BASOR27805145
  11. Casana, J, Gansell, AR and Yener, KA. 2005. Surface ceramics, off-site survey, and floodplain development at Tell Atchana (Alalakh). In: Yener, KA (ed.) The Amuq Valley Regional Projects 1: Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, pp. 199–224.
  12. Casana, J and Wilkinson, TJ. 2005. Settlement and landscapes in the Amuq region. In: Yener, KA (ed.) The Amuq Valley Regional Projects 1: Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, pp. 25–65.
  13. Collar, A, Coward, F, Brughmans, T and Mills, BJ. 2015. ‘Networks in archaeology: Phenomena, abstraction, representation’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1): 1–32. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-014-9235-6
  14. Coscia, M and Neffke, F. 2017. Network backboning with noisy data. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). DOI: 10.1109/ICDE.2017.100
  15. Donnellan, L. (ed.) 2020. Archaeological Networks and Social Interaction. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351003063
  16. Intxaurbe, I. 2026. ‘Mapping the symbolic structure of Palaeolithic rock art using co-occurrence network analysis’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 33: 59. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-026-09796-y
  17. Knappett, C. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199215454.001.0001
  18. Liebig, J and Rao, A. 2016. ‘Fast extraction of the backbone of projected bipartite networks to aid community detection’. Europhysics Letters, 113(2): 28003. DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/113/28003
  19. Mills, BJ. 2016. Communities of Consumption: Cuisines as Constellated Networks of Situated Practice. In: Knowledge in Motion: Constellations of Learning Across Time and Place. Amerind Studies in Anthropology. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. pp. 247–270.
  20. Moreno-Navarro, F. 2024. ‘Similarity in consumption patterns among peasant communities in Roman Central Hispania through network science’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 7(1). DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.120
  21. Neal, Z. 2014. ‘The backbone of bipartite projections: Inferring relationships from co-authorship, co-sponsorship, co-attendance and other co-behaviors’. Social Networks, 39: 84–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.06.001
  22. Neal, ZP. 2022. ‘backbone: An R package to extract network backbones’. PLOS ONE, 17(5): e0269137. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269137
  23. Östborn, P and Gerding, H. 2014. ‘Network analysis of archaeological data: a systematic approach’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 46: 75–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.015
  24. Peeples, MA. 2019. ‘Finding a place for networks in archaeology’. Journal of Archaeological Research, 27: 451–499. DOI: 10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8
  25. Peeples, MA and Bischoff, RJ. 2023. ‘Archaeological networks, community detection, and critical scales of interaction in the U.S. Southwest/Mexican Northwest’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 70: 101511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2023.101511
  26. Peeples, MA and Mills, BJ. 2018. ‘Frontiers of marginality and mediation in the U.S. Southwest: A social networks perspective’. In: Harry, K and Herr, S (eds.) Life Beyond the Boundaries: Constructing Identity in Edge Regions of the North American Southwest. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, pp. 25–56. DOI: 10.5876/9781607326960.c002
  27. Peeples, MA and Roberts, JM, Jr. 2013. ‘To Binarize or Not to Binarize: Relational Data and the Construction of Archaeological Networks’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(7): 3001–3010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.014
  28. Prignano, L, Morer, I and Diaz-Guilera, A. 2017. ‘Wiring the Past: A Network Science Perspective on the Challenge of Archaeological Similarity Networks’. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 4: 13. DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2017.00013
  29. Riris, P and Oliver, J. 2019. ‘Patterns of style, diversity, and similarity in Middle Orinoco rock art assemblages’. Arts, 8(2): 48. DOI: 10.3390/arts8020048
  30. Serrano, MÁ, Boguñá, M and Vespignani, A. 2009. ‘Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16): 6483–6488. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808904106
  31. Tumminello, M, Miccichè, S, Lillo, F, Piilo, J and Mantegna, RN. 2011. ‘Statistically validated networks in bipartite complex systems’. PLoS ONE, 6(3): e17994. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017994
  32. Visser, RM. 2021. ‘Dendrochronological Provenance Patterns. Network Analysis of Tree-Ring Material Reveals Spatial and Economic Relations of Roman Timber in the Continental North-Western Provinces’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 4(1): 230–253. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.79
  33. Wilkinson, TJ. 2003. Archaeological Landscapes of the Near East. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1jf2ddx
  34. Yassin, A, Cherifi, H, Seba, H and Togni, O. 2025. ‘Exploring weighted network backbone extraction: A comparative analysis of structural techniques’. PLOS ONE, 20(5): e0322298. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322298
  35. Yener, KA. (ed.) 2005. The Amuq Valley Regional Projects 1: Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.281 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Page range: 312 - 328
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 10, 2026
Published on: Sep 22, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Dario Nincheri, Marco Moderato, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.