From Points to Pixels – a Comparison of Structured Light, Photogrammetry, and Low-Cost Lidar Approaches in Archaeological Excavation

Jitte Waagen; Tijm Lanjouw

doi:10.5334/jcaa.245

From Points to Pixels – a Comparison of Structured Light, Photogrammetry, and Low-Cost Lidar Approaches in Archaeological Excavation

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology

Volume 9 (2026): Issue 1

By: Jitte Waagen and Tijm Lanjouw

Open Access

|Jul 2026

Abbas, S and Abed, FM. 2024. ‘Evaluating the accuracy of iPhone LiDAR sensor for building façades conservation’. Advances in Archaeological Practice, pp. 31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48715-6_31
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agisoft. 2025. Metashape. Available at: https://www.agisoft.com/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Artec 3D. 2025. Artec Leo. Available at: https://www.artec3d.com/portable-3d-scanners/artec-leo [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Artec 3D. 2025. Artec Studio. Available at: https://www.artec3d.com/3d-software/artec-studio [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Badillo, AE, Brennan, MR, Estes, AM, Aldrich, SP and Emmerson, ALC. 2024. ‘A paperless and 3D workflow for documenting excavations at Insula I.14, Pompeii, Italy’. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 12(2): 107–121. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2024.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barnhart, T and Crosby, B. 2013. ‘Comparing two methods of surface change detection on an evolving thermokarst using high-temporal-frequency terrestrial laser scanning, Selawik River, Alaska’. Remote Sensing, 5(6): 2813–2837. DOI: 10.3390/rs5062813
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berggren, Å, Dell’Unto, N, Forte, M, Haddow, SD, Hodder, I, Issavi, J, Lercari, N, Mazzucato, C, Mickel, A and Taylor, JS. 2015. ‘Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge’. Antiquity, 89: 433–448. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2014.43
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berggren, Å and Gutehall, A. 2018. ‘Going from analogue to digital: A study of documentation methods during an excavation of the Neolithic flint mines at Pilbladet, Sweden’. Current Swedish Archaeology, 26: 119–158. DOI: 10.37718/CSA.2018.10
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blender GIS. 2025. Blender GIS. Available at: https://blender-addons.org/blendergis-addon/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunge, M. 1963. ‘A general black box theory’. Philosophy of Science, 30(4): 346–358. DOI: 10.1086/287954
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boyd, MJ, Campbell, R, Doonan, RCP, Douglas, C, Gavalas, G, Gkouma, M and Renfrew, C. 2021. ‘Open area, open data: Advances in reflexive archaeological practice’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 46(2): 62–80. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1859780
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brookes, T. 2022. ‘Your iPhone Pro Has LiDAR: 7 Cool Things You Can Do With It’. How-To Geek. Available at: https://www.howtogeek.com/759121/your-iphone-pro-has-lidar-7-cool-things-you-can-do-with-it/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caraher, W. 2016. ‘Slow archaeology: Technology, efficiency, and archaeological work’. In: Averett, EW, Gordon, JM and Counts, DB (eds.), Mobilizing the past for a digital future: The potential of digital archaeology. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, pp. 421–441. DOI: 10.17613/M6ZG8P
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CloudCompare. 2025. CloudCompare. Available at: https://www.cloudcompare.org/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dell’Unto, N, Landeschi, G, Apel, J and Poggi, G. 2017. ‘4D recording at the trowel’s edge: Using three-dimensional simulation platforms to support field interpretation’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12: 632–645. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.03.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Reu, J, De Smedt, P, Herremans, D, Van Meirvenne, M, Laloo, P and De Clerq, W. 2014. ‘On introducing an image-based 3D reconstruction method in archaeological excavation practice’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41: 251–262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Furlan, LM and Piazentim, EG. 2025. ‘Smartphone-based LiDAR for generating digital outcrop models (DOMs) with field validation’. Discover Geoscience, 3(1): 137. DOI: 10.1007/s44288-025-00253-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leucci, G, De Giorgi, L and Scardozzi, G. 2014. ‘Geophysical prospecting and remote sensing for the study of the San Rossore area in Pisa (Tuscany, Italy)’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 52: 256–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.028
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lievendag, N. 2017. ‘Artec Leo Preview: Video, Sample Scan, Specs, Price & Release Date’. 3D Mag. Available at: https://www.3dmag.com/news/preview-artec-leo-portable-3d-scanner/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luetzenburg, G, Kroon, A and Bjørk, AA. 2021. ‘Evaluation of the Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR for an application in geosciences’. Scientific Reports, 11: 22221. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01763-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Madeleine, P. 2021. ‘3Dnatives Lab: Testing the Artec Leo 3D Scanner’. 3Dnatives. Available at: https://www.3dnatives.com/en/3dnatives-lab-testing-the-artec-leo-3d-scanner-150320214/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morgan, C, Petrie, H, Wright, H and Taylor, JS. 2021. ‘Drawing and knowledge construction in archaeology: The Aide Mémoire project’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 46(8): 614–628. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2021.1985304
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morgan, C and Wright, H. 2018. ‘Pencils and pixels: Drawing and digital media in archaeological field recording’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(2): 136–151. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neubauer, W and Doneus, M. 2005. ‘Laser scanners for 3D documentation of stratigraphic excavations’. In: Baltsavias, E (ed.), Recording, modeling and visualization of cultural heritage: Proceedings of the International Workshop, Centro Stefano Franscini, Monte Verita, Ascona, 22–27 May 2005. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 193–204.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nobles, G and Roosevelt, C. 2021. ‘Filling the void in archaeological excavations: 2D point clouds to 3D volumes’. Open Archaeology, 7(1): 589–614. DOI: 10.1515/opar-2020-0149
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nogee, A. 2021. ‘Samsung abandons lidar sensors in phones’. Laser Focus World. Available at: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/blogs/article/14205758/samsung-abandons-lidar-sensors-in-phones [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olson, BR, Placchetti, RA, Quartermaine, J and Killebrew, AE. 2013. ‘The Tel Akko total archaeology project (Akko, Israel): Assessing the suitability of multi-scale 3D field recording in archaeology’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 38(3): 244–262. DOI: 10.1179/0093469013Z.00000000056
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Paukkonen, N. 2023. ‘Towards a mobile 3D documentation solution: Video-based photogrammetry and iPhone 12 Pro as fieldwork documentation tools’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 6(1): 143–154. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.135
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pollefeys, M, van Gool, L, Vergauwen, M, Cornelis, K, Verbiest, F and Tops, J. 2001. ‘Image-based 3D acquisition of archaeological heritage and applications’. In: Arnold, D, Chalmers, A and Fellner, DW (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 conference on virtual reality, archaeology, and cultural heritage. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 255–262. DOI: 10.1145/584993.585033
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
QGIS. 2025. QGIS. Available at: https://qgis.org/ [Last accessed 8 July 2026].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reinders, HR. 1988. New Halos: A Hellenistic town in Thessalía, Greece. Leiden: Brill | Hes & De Graaf. DOI: 10.1163/9789004614062
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roosevelt, CH, Cobb, P, Moss, E, Olson, BR and Ünlüsoy, S. 2015. ‘Excavation is destruction digitization: Advances in archaeological practice.’ Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(3): 325–346. DOI: 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ross, S, Ballsun-Stanton, B, Cassidy, S, Crook, P, Klump, J and Sobotkova, A. 2022. ‘FAIRer data through digital recording: The FAIMS mobile experience’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 5(1): 271–285. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.96
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sapirstein, P and Murray, S. 2017. ‘Establishing best practices for photogrammetric recording during archaeological fieldwork’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 42(4): 337–350. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2017.1338513
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stissi, V, Heymans, E, Dijkstra, T, Reinders, R, Agnousiotis, D, Efstathiou, S, Kamphorst, S, Mamaloudi, I, Rondiri, V, Van Rookhuijzen, J and Stamelou, E. 2015. ‘Halos: Preliminary report of the 2013–2014 trial trenches at Magoula Plataniotiki’. Pharos: Journal of the Netherlands Institute in Athens, 21(2): 85–116. DOI: 10.2143/PHA.21.2.3206296
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stissi, V, Heymans, E, Waagen, J, Rondiri, V, Agnousiotis, D, Dijkstra, T and Efstathiou, D. 2020. ‘Halos: Preliminary report of the 2015 field survey and the 2016 trial trenches at Magoula Plataniotiki’. Pharos: Journal of the Netherlands Institute in Athens, 24: 113–136. DOI: 10.2143/PHA.24.0.3289833
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waagen, J. 2019. ‘New technology and archaeological practice: Improving the primary archaeological recording process in excavation by means of UAS photogrammetry’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 101: 11–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2018.10.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waagen, J and van Hilst, A. 2025. ‘Drones over excavations: Enhancing the archaeologist’s eyes. An empirical case study into the deployment of UAS remote sensing as a research tool for archaeological excavation in Veldhoven, the Netherlands’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 62: 105043. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105043
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wallrodt, J. 2016. ‘Why paperless: Technology and changes in archaeological practice, 1996–2016’. In: Averett, EW, Gordon, JM and Counts, DB (Eds.), Mobilizing the past for a digital future: The potential of digital archaeology. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota, pp. 33–50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJG, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, Hoen, PAC ‘t, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Rocca-Serra, P, Roos, M, van Schaik, R, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, van der Lei, J, van Mulligen, E, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K and Zhao, J. 2016. ‘The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship’. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams, R, Errickson, D and Taylor, G. 2021. ‘Mapping an archaeological site: Interpreting portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) soil analysis at Boroughgate, Skelton, UK’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 38: 103109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103109
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article