Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Tool for Understanding Taskscapes in Stone Age Coastal Hunter-Fisher-Gatherer Societies: Theoretical Aspects of Building a Relational Database (NAUTICC) for Large-Scale Analysis Cover

A Tool for Understanding Taskscapes in Stone Age Coastal Hunter-Fisher-Gatherer Societies: Theoretical Aspects of Building a Relational Database (NAUTICC) for Large-Scale Analysis

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Anichini, F, et al. 2012a. A database for archaeological data recording and analysis. MapPapers, 1en-II: 21–38. DOI: 10.4456/MAPPA.2012.02
  2. Anichini, F, et al. 2012b. MAPPA. Metodologie applicate alla predittività del potenziale archeologico, vol. 1. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura. DOI: 10.4458/0917
  3. Anichini, F, Gattiglia, G and Saponara, AR. 2023. ‘MAGOH: un nuovo strumento per la gestione e la consultazione dei dati archeologici del Nord della Toscana’. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 34(2): 277–296. DOI: 10.19282/ac.34.2.2023.15
  4. Apel, J. 2008. ‘Knowledge, know-how and raw material – the production of Late Neolithic flint daggers in Scandinavia’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15(1): 91–111. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-007-9044-2
  5. Arias, P. 2009. ‘Rites in the dark? An evaluation of the current evidence for ritual areas at Magdalenian cave sites’. World Archaeology, 41(2): 262–294. DOI: 10.1080/00438240902843964
  6. Babalola, AB. 2024. ‘The Ile-Ife glass bead series: classification, chaîne opératoire and the ‘glass bead roads’ in West African archaeology’. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 59(4): 527–552. DOI: 10.1080/0067270X.2024.2412945
  7. Bell, C. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195110517.001.0001
  8. Berg-Hansen, IM. 2017. The social technology. Technology and tradition in Northern Europe at the end of the Ice Age, 10,900–8,500 BC. Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of Oslo. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10852/114607 [Last accessed 16 September 2025].
  9. Berg-Hansen, IM, Damlien, H and Zagorska, I. 2019. ‘The Northern Fringe of the Swiderian Technological Tradition: Salaspils Laukskola revisited’. Archaeologia Baltica, 26: 12–31. DOI: 10.15181/ab.v26i0.2020
  10. Berg-Hansen, M, Mjærum, A, Roalkvam, I, Solheim, S and Schülke, A. 2023. ‘Coast concepts in Norwegian Stone Age archaeology’. In: Marchand, G, Paillier, Y and Stéphan, P (eds.) Investigate the shore, sound out the past: Methods and practices of maritime prehistory/Explorer la côte, sonder le passé: Actes de la séance de la Société préhistorique française de Brest (décembre 2020). Paris: Société préhistorique française, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.5285/A29C5465-B138-234D-E053-6C86ABC040B9
  11. Binford, LR. 1980. ‘Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation’. American Antiquity, 45(1): 4–20. DOI: 10.2307/279653
  12. Boyd, R, Richerson, PJ and Henrich, J. 2011. ‘The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (Supplement 2): 10918–10925. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100290108
  13. Buckland, PI. 2014. ‘SEAD – The Strategic Environmental Archaeology Database: Inter-linking multiproxy environmental data with archaeological investigations and ecology’. In: Earl, G, Sly, T, Wheatley, D, Romanowska, I, Papadopoulos, C, Murrieta-Flores, P and Chrysanthi, A (eds.) Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, 26–29 March 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 320–331. DOI: 10.1515/9789048519590-035
  14. Cardinal, JS. 2019. ‘Sets, graphs, and things we can see: A formal combinatorial ontology for empirical intra-site analysis’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 2(1): 56–78. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.16
  15. Crema, ER and Bevan, A. 2021. ‘Inference from large sets of radiocarbon dates: Software and methods’. Radiocarbon, 63(1): 23–39. DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2020.95
  16. Crema, ER, Dee, TK and Wanner, B. 2020. ‘Rcarbon: Methods for calibrating and analysing radiocarbon dates’. Journal of Open Archaeology Data, 8(1): 2. DOI: 10.5334/joad.61
  17. Doerr, M. 2003. ‘The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata’. AI magazine, 24(3), 75–75. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1720
  18. Driscoll, K. 2017. ‘Approaching the Mesolithic through taskscapes: A case study from western Ireland’. In: Rajala, U and Mills, P (eds.) Forms of dwelling: 20 years of taskscapes in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 41–61.
  19. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2012. DCMI metadata terms. Availabe at: https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/.
  20. Eriksen, BV. 2000. ‘“Chaîne opératoire” – den operative proces og kunsten at tænke som en flinthugger’. In: Eriksen, BV (ed.) Flintstudier: En håndbog i systematiske analyser af flintinventarer. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, pp. 75–100.
  21. Farace, DJ. (ed.) 1998. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Grey Literature: Perspectives on the design and transfer of scientific and technical information (GL’97), Luxembourg, 13–14 November 1997. Amsterdam: TransAtlantic (GL-Conference Series, no. 3).
  22. Fretheim, SE. 2019. ‘Discovering dwellings: A study of Late Mesolithic dwelling practices, contexts and attributes based on evidence from Central Norway’. Acta Archaeologica, 90(1): 15–38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0390.2019.12203.x
  23. Fronza, V. 2003. ‘Principi di database management in archeologia: l’esperienza senese’. In: Società degli Archeologi Medievisti Italiani (eds.) 3° Congresso nazionale di archeologia medievale: Castello di Salerno, Complesso di Santa Sofia, Salerno, 2–5 ottobre 2003. Florence: All’Insegna del Giglio, pp. 1000–1004.
  24. Gattiglia, G. 2018. ‘Databases in archaeology’. In: López Varela, SL (ed.) The encyclopedia of archaeological sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0147
  25. Gonzalez-Perez, C. 2018. Information modelling for archaeology and anthropology: Software engineering principles for cultural heritage. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72652-6
  26. Guermandi, MP. 1999. ‘Dalle basi dati alla rete: l’evoluzione del trattamento dei dati archeologici’. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 10: 89–100.
  27. Hardy, K. 2008. ‘Prehistoric string theory: How twisted fibres helped to shape the world’. Antiquity, 82(316): 271–280. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00096794
  28. Hayden, B. 1998. ‘Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(1): 1–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177377.
  29. Henrich, J and McElreath, R. 2003. ‘The evolution of cultural evolution’. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12(3): 123–135. DOI: 10.1002/evan.10110
  30. Huma-Num. 2013. Documentation de l’infrastructure Huma-Num. Paris: Huma-Num. Available at: https://documentation.huma-num.fr/ [Last accessed 4 August 2025].
  31. Huma-Num/CNRS. 2014. NAKALA: partager, publier et valoriser vos données scientifiques. Available at: https://www.nakala.fr/ [Last accessed 4 August 2025].
  32. Ingold, T. 1993. ‘The temporality of the landscape’. World Archaeology, 25(2): 152–174. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
  33. Ingold, T. 2017. ‘Taking taskscape to task’. In: Rajala, U and Mills, P (eds.) Forms of dwelling: 20 years of taskscapes in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 16–27.
  34. Inizan, M-L, Reduron-Ballinger, M, Roche, H and Tixier, J. 1999. Technology and terminology of knapped stone (Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée 5). Nanterre: CREP.
  35. Jordan, PD. 2014. Technology as human social tradition: Cultural transmission among hunter-gatherers. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520276925.001.0001
  36. Kelly, RL. 2013. The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: The foraging spectrum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139176132
  37. Lane, PJ. 2014. ‘Hunter-gatherer-fishers, ethnoarchaeology, and analogical reasoning’. In: Cummings, V, Jordan, P and Zvelebil, M (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199551224.013.024
  38. Larson, ML and Komfeld, M. 1997. ‘Chipped stone nodules: Theory, method, and examples’. Lithic Technology, 22(1): 4–18. DOI: 10.1080/01977261.1997.11754530
  39. Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1993. Gesture and speech. Translated by A.B. Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1964).
  40. López-Montalvo, E, Roldán, C, Badal, E, Murcia-Mascarós, S and Villaverde, V. 2017. ‘Identification of plant cells in black pigments of prehistoric Spanish Levantine rock art by means of a multi-analytical approach: A new method for social identity materialization using chaîne opératoire’. PLoS One, 12(2): e0172225. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172225
  41. Lucid Software. n.d. Lucidchart. Available at: https://www.lucidchart.com [Last accessed 16 September 2025].
  42. Marchand, G. 2014. Quiberon (56). Beg er Vil: un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP 2014 (Rapport n° RAP03047). Rennes: Service régional de l’archéologie de Bretagne. Available at: https://bibliotheque-numerique-sra-bretagne.huma-num.fr/s/sra-bretagne/item/30269.
  43. Marchand, G. 2015. Quiberon (56). Beg er Vil: un habitat du Mésolithique sur le littoral du Morbihan. Rapport de FP 2015 (Rapport n° RAP03187). Rennes: Service régional de l’archéologie de Bretagne. Available at: https://bibliotheque-numerique-sra-bretagne.huma-num.fr/s/sra-bretagne/item/30568.
  44. Mauss, M. 1973. ‘Techniques of the body’. Economy and Society, 2(1): 70–88. (Original work published 1934). DOI: 10.1080/03085147300000003
  45. McCoy, MD. 2020. ‘The site problem: A critical review of the site concept in archaeology in the digital age’. Journal of Field Archaeology, 45(Suppl. 1): S18–S26. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1713283
  46. Oswalt, WH. 1973. Habitat and technology: The evolution of hunting. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  47. Pelegrin, J. 1990. Prehistoric lithic technology: Some aspects of research. DOI: 10.17863/CAM.109791
  48. Posit team. 2025. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. Available at: https://www.posit.co/.
  49. Rabinowitz, A, Shaw, R, Buchanan, S, Golden, P and Kansa, E. 2016. ‘Making sense of the ways we make sense of the past: The PeriodO Project’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 59(2): 42–55. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-5370.2016.12037.x
  50. Reimer, PJ, Austin, WE, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Ramsey, CB, … and Talamo, S. 2020. ‘The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP)’. Radiocarbon, 62(4): 725–757. DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2020.41
  51. Schild, R. 1980. ‘Introduction to dynamic technological analysis of chipped stone assemblages’. In: Schild, R (ed.) Unconventional archaeology: New approaches and goals in Polish archaeology. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, pp. 57–87.
  52. Schmidt, SC, Thiery, F and Trognitz, M. 2022. ‘Practices of linked open data in archaeology and their realisation in Wikidata’. Digital, 2(3): 333–364. DOI: 10.3390/digital2030019
  53. Silberschatz, A, Korth, HF and Sudarshan, S. 2019. Database system concepts, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  54. Sørensen, M. 2006a. ‘Rethinking the lithic blade definition: Towards a dynamic understanding’. In: Apel, J and Knutsson, K (eds.) Skilled production and social reproduction: Aspects of traditional stone-tool technologies. Proceedings of a symposium in Uppsala, 20–24 August 2003. Uppsala: SAU, pp. 277–296.
  55. Sørensen, M. 2006b. ‘The chaîne opératoire applied to Arctic archaeology’. In: Arneborg, J and Grønnow, B (eds.) Proceedings of the SILA/NABO Conference on Arctic and North Atlantic Archaeology 2004. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark, pp. 31–44.
  56. Torrence, R. 1983. ‘Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology’. In: Bailey, G (ed.) Hunter-gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–22.
  57. University of Oslo. n.d. ARCHE: Archaeology, climate and heritage. Available at: https://www.arche.uio.no/.
  58. van Haaster, H and Brinkkemper, O. 1995. ‘RADAR, a relational archaeobotanical database for advanced research’. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 4: 117–125. DOI: 10.1007/BF00206920
  59. Viken, S and Sundström, L. 2017. E18 Tvedestrand–Arendal: Delrapport Krøgenes D8 – Lokalitet med aktivitetsspor fra steinalder og jernalder. Krøgenes tjern, 511/67, Arendal, Aust-Agder. Excavation report. Oslo: University of Oslo, DUO. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/68428.
  60. Willey, GR and Phillips, P. 2001. Method and theory in American archaeology, reprint edn. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.244 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Page range: 348 - 365
Submitted on: Sep 19, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2026
Published on: Oct 6, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Giada Pirrone, Marie-Yvane Daire, Inger Marie Berg-Hansen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.