Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Australian Overview: The Creation and Use of 3D Models in Australian Universities Cover

An Australian Overview: The Creation and Use of 3D Models in Australian Universities

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Volume 8 (2025): Issue 1
By: Thomas James Keep,  Madeline G. P. Robinson,  Jackson Shoobert and  Jessie Birkett-Rees  
Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. 1Adams, JW, Olah, A, McCurry, MR and Potze, S. 2015. ‘Surface Model and Tomographic Archive of Fossil Primate and Other Mammal Holotype and Paratype Specimens of the Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, Pretoria, South Africa Wilson, BA (ed.)’. PloS one, 10(10): e0139800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139800
    Back to article
  2. 2Adobe. 2023. Photoshop CC version v.24.1.
    Back to article
  3. 3Agisoft. 2018. Photoscan Professional Edition version 1.4.2 build 6205.
    Back to article
  4. 4Agisoft. 2023. Metashape Professional Edition version 2.0.3 build 16915.
    Back to article
  5. 5Almeida, F and Lovett, T. 2016. ‘At the Distance of a Snapshot (Well, Maybe More than One): Affordable 3D modelling of Aboriginal cultural heritage through photogrammetry’. In: Spry, C, Foley, E, Frankel, D and Lawrence, S (eds.) Excavations, Surveys and Heritage Management in Victoria. Bundoora: La Trobe University, pp. 35–45.
    Back to article
  6. 6Artec. 2021. Artec Studio version 16.0.2.899.
    Back to article
  7. 7Artec. 2024. Artec Studio version 18.1.2.25.
    Back to article
  8. 8Atanasiu, V and Marthot-Santaniello, I. 2022. ‘Personalizing Image Enhancement for Critical Visual Tasks: Improved legibility of papyri using color processing and visual illusions’. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 25(2): 129–160. DOI: 10.1007/s10032-021-00386-0
    Back to article
  9. 9Australian Museum. 2011. Rapid Digitisation Project: Final Report. Sydney: Australian Museum.
    Back to article
  10. 10Beacham, R, Denard, H and Niccolucci, F. 2006. ‘An Introduction to the London Charter’. In: Ioannides, M, Arnold, D, Niccolucci, F and Mania, K (eds.) The E-volution of ICTechnology in Cultural Heritage, Papers from the Joint Event CIPA/VAST/EG/EuroMed Event, 2006. Budapest: Archeolingua, pp. 263–270.
    Back to article
  11. 11Bickler, SH. 2021. ‘Machine Learning Arrives in Archaeology’. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 9(2): 186–191. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2021.6
    Back to article
  12. 12Blender Foundation. 2023. Blender version 2.93.3.
    Back to article
  13. 13Bornstein, D and Keep, TJ. 2023. ‘New Dimensions in Conservation Imaging: Combining Photogrammetry and Photometric Stereo for 3D Documentation of Heritage Artefacts’. AICCM Bulletin, 44(1–2): 148–162. DOI: 10.1080/10344233.2023.2288467
    Back to article
  14. 14Boyer, DM, Gunnell, GF, Kaufman, S and McGeary, TM. 2016. ‘Morphosource: Archiving and Sharing 3-D Digital Specimen Data’. The Paleontological Society Papers, 22: 157–181. DOI: 10.1017/scs.2017.13
    Back to article
  15. 15Byeon, W, Domínguez-Rodrigo, M, Arampatzis, G, Baquedano, E, Yravedra, J, Maté-González, MA and Koumoutsakos, P. 2019. ‘Automated Identification and Deep Classification of Cut Marks on Bones and its Paleoanthropological Implications’. Journal of Computational Science, 32: 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.02.005
    Back to article
  16. 16Cabrelles, M, Lerma, JL and Villaverde, V. 2020. ‘Macro Photogrammetry & Surface Features Extraction for Paleolithic Portable Art Documentation’. Applied Sciences, 10(19): 6908. DOI: 10.3390/app10196908
    Back to article
  17. 17Chandler, T, McKee, B, Wilson, E, Yeates, M and Polkinghorne, M. 2017. ‘A New Model of Angkor Wat: Simulated Reconstruction as a Methodology for Analysis and Public Engagement’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art, 17(2): 182–194. DOI: 10.1080/14434318.2017.1450063
    Back to article
  18. 18Chandler, T, Morgan, T and Kuhlen, TW. 2018. ‘Exploring Immersive Analytics for Built Environments’. In: Marriott, K, Schreiber, F, Dwyer, T, Klein, K, Riche, NH, Itoh, T, Stuerzlinger, W and Thomas, BH (eds.) Immersive Analytics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 331–357. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01388-2_11
    Back to article
  19. 19Chatterjee, H. 2009. ‘Staying Essential: Articulating the Value of Object Based Learning’. University Museums and Collections Journal, 1: 1–6. DOI: 10.18452/8626
    Back to article
  20. 20Chatterjee, HJ, Hannan, L and Thomson, L. 2016. ‘An introduction to object-based learning and multisensory engagement’. In: Chatterjee, HJ and Hannan, L (eds.) Engaging the senses: Object-based learning in higher education. London: Routledge, pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.4324/9781315579641
    Back to article
  21. 21Chauvel, P. 2020. Layered Landscapes: An historical archaeology of Maria Island’s industrial periods. PhD Thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
    Back to article
  22. 22Chauvel, P and Flexner, JL. 2020. ‘Mapping Difference in the “Uniform” Workers’ Cottages of Maria Island, Tasmania’. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 24(4): 902–919. DOI: 10.1007/s10761-019-00531-w
    Back to article
  23. 23Christofi, M, Kyrlitsias, C, Michael-Grigoriou, D, Anastasiadou, Z, Michaelidou, M, Papamichael, I and Pieri, K. 2018. ‘A Tour in the Archaeological Site of Choirokoitia using Virtual Reality: A learning performance and interest generation assessment’. In: Ioannides, M, Martins, J, Žarnić, R and Veranika, L (eds.), Advances in digital cultural heritage. Cham: Springer, pp. 208–217. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75789-6_15
    Back to article
  24. 24Cignoni, P, Callieri, M, Corsini, M, Dellepiane, M, Ganovelli, F and Ranzuglia, G. 2008. ‘Meshlab: An open-source mesh processing tool.’ In: Scarano, V, De Chiara, R and Erra, U. (eds.) Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference (2008). Salerno: The Eurographics Association, pp. 129–136.
    Back to article
  25. 25Cobb, PJ, Cobb, E, Jiafang Liang, Kiyama, R and Jeremy Ng. 2024. ‘Theoretical Foundations for Archaeological Pedagogy with Digital 3D, Virtual, A tual, Augmented, and Mix ugmented, and Mixed Reality Technologies’. Journal of Archaeology & Education, 8(1): 1–29.
    Back to article
  26. 26D’Andrea, A and Fernie, K. 2013. ‘CARARE 2.0: A metadata schema for 3D cultural objects’. In: Addison, A, De Luca, L, Guidi, G and Pescarin, S (eds.), 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage). IEEE, pp. 137–143. DOI: 10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744745
    Back to article
  27. 27David, B, Fresløv, J, Mullett, R, Delannoy, J-J, Petchey, F, Land, G, Mialanes, J, Russell, L, Wood, R and Arnold, LJ. 2021. ‘Paradigm Shifts and Ontological Turns at Cloggs cave, GunaiKurnai Country, Australia’. In: Moro Abadía, O and Porr, M (eds.) Ontologies of Rock Art. London: Routledge, pp. 135–160. DOI: 10.4324/9780429321863-6
    Back to article
  28. 28Delannoy, J-J, David, B, Fresløv, J, Mullett, R, GunaiKurnai Land And Waters Aboriginal Corporation, Green, H, Berthet, J, Petchey, F, Arnold, LJ, Wood, R, McDowell, M, Crouch, J, Mialanes, J, Ash, J and Wong, VNL. 2020. ‘Geomorphological Context and Formation History of Cloggs Cave: What was the cave like when people inhabited it?’ Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33: 102461. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102461
    Back to article
  29. 29Dixon, A, Laven, R, Emmitt, J, Richardson, S, Phillipps, R, Holdaway, S and Nielsen, PMF. 2024. ‘Semi-automated and High-throughput Photogrammetry of Stone Artefacts’. Paper presented at Across the Horizon. 51st Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology International Conference. 8–12 April 2024, Auckland Tāmaki Makaurau, Aotearoa New Zealand.
    Back to article
  30. 30Economou, M and Pujol-Tost, L. 2008. ‘Educational Tool or Expensive Toy? Evaluating VR evaluation and its relevance for virtual heritage’. In: Kalay, Y, Kvan, T and Affleck, J (eds.), New heritage: New media and cultural heritage. London: Routledge, pp. 242–260.
    Back to article
  31. 31Evans, L and Mourad, A-L. 2018. ‘DStretch® and Egyptian Tomb Paintings: A case study from Beni Hassan’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 18: 78–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.01.011
    Back to article
  32. 32Forte, M and Siliotti, A. (eds.) 1997. Virtual Archaeology: Great Discoveries Brought to Life Through Virtual Archaeology. London: Thames and Hudson.
    Back to article
  33. 33Fraile, FJL, García, LMG and Klink, AC. 2016. ‘3D Documentation and Use of DStretch for Two New Sites with Post-Paleolithic Rock Art in Sierra Morena, Spain’. Rock Art Research: The Journal of the Australian Rock Art Research Association (AURA), 33(2): 127–142.
    Back to article
  34. 34Fraser, J, Lord, C and Magnussen, J. 2022. Speak My Name: Investigating Egyptian Mummies. Sydney: Sydney University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv31svrpb
    Back to article
  35. 35Frischer, B, Abernathy, D, Guidi, G, Myers, J, Thibodeau, C, Salvemini, A, Müller, P, Hofstee, P and Minor, B. 2008. ‘Rome Reborn’. In: SIGGRAPH ’08: SIGGRAPH 2008 new tech demos. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 34:1. DOI: 10.1145/1401615.1401649
    Back to article
  36. 36German, SC. 2024. ‘Object-Based Teaching in Post-Pandemic Higher Education in the US’. Journal of Museum Education, 49(3): 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/10598650.2023.2283825
    Back to article
  37. 37GigaMesh. 2023. GigaMesh Software Framework version 230622.
    Back to article
  38. 38Gopnik, H and Rindi Nuzzolo, C. 2022. Centre for Ancient Cultures Museum Collection. Melbourne: Monash University. DOI: 10.26180/C.5707865.V2
    Back to article
  39. 39Guerry, E and Thogersen, J. 2023. ‘Reflections on a Disrupted Object-Based Learning Program’. University Museums and Collections Journal, 14(1): 36–43.
    Back to article
  40. 40Guidi, G, Micoli, LL, Gonizzi, S, Navarro, PR and Russo, M. 2013. ‘3D Digitizing a Whole Museum: A metadata centered workflow’. In: Addison, A, De Luca, L, Guidi, G and Pescarin, S (eds.), 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage). IEEE, pp. 307–310. DOI: 10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6744768
    Back to article
  41. 41Gündemir, O, Koungoulos, L, Szara, T, Duro, S, Spataru, M, Michaud, M and Onar, V. 2023. ‘Cranial Morphology of Balkan and West Asian livestock guardian dogs’. Journal of Anatomy, 243(6): 951–959. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13929
    Back to article
  42. 42Gunn, RG, Douglas, LC and Whear, RL. 2014. ‘Interpreting Polychrome Paintings using DStretch’. Rock Art Research, 31(1): 101–104.
    Back to article
  43. 43Hannan, L, Duhs, R and Chatterjee, H. 2013. ‘Object-Based Learning: A Powerful Pedagogy for Higher Education’. In: Boddington, A, Boys, J and Speight, C (eds.), Museums and Higher Education Working Together. London: Routledge, pp. 159–168. DOI: 10.4324/9781315596471-15
    Back to article
  44. 44Harman, J. 2008. ‘Using Decorrelation Stretch to Enhance Rock Art Images’. In: American Rock Art Research Association Annual Meeting May 28, 2005. Sparks, NV: American Rock Art Research Association, pp. 1–4.
    Back to article
  45. 45Homburg, T, Cramer, A, Raddatz, L and Mara, H. 2021. ‘Metadata Schema and Ontology for Capturing and Processing of 3D Cultural Heritage Objects’. Heritage Science, 9(1): 91. DOI: 10.1186/s40494-021-00561-w
    Back to article
  46. 46ImageJ. 2022. ImageJ version 1.53t.
    Back to article
  47. 47Jamieson, A. 2017. ‘Object Based Learning: A New Way of Teaching in Arts West’. University of Melbourne Collections, 20: 12–14.
    Back to article
  48. 48Joyce, R. 2012. ‘Life with Things: Archaeology and materiality’. In: Shankland, D (ed.) Archaeology and Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 119–132. DOI: 10.4324/9781003084679-7
    Back to article
  49. 49Karami, A, Menna, F and Remondino, F. 2021. ‘Investigating 3d Reconstruction Of Non-Collaborative Surfaces Through Photogrammetry And Photometric Stereo’. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43: 519–526. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-519-2021
    Back to article
  50. 50Karami, A, Menna, F and Remondino, F. 2022. ‘Combining Photogrammetry and Photometric Stereo to Achieve Precise and Complete 3D Reconstruction’. Sensors, 22(21): 8172-1–24. DOI: 10.3390/s22218172
    Back to article
  51. 51Kearney, A, Bradley, J and Dodd, V. 2025. ‘‘Keeping Inside the Law’: Digital Animations, Indigenous Law & Younger Generation Yanyuwa, Northern Australia’. Anthropological Forum, 35(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2025.2491380
    Back to article
  52. 52Keep, T. 2022a. ‘Digitization of Museum Collections and the Hellenic Museum Digitization Project’. Iris: Journal of the Classical Association of Victoria, 32–33(1): 16–27.
    Back to article
  53. 53Keep, TJ. 2022b. ‘The Mernda VR Project: The Creation of a VR Reconstruction of an Australian Heritage Site’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 5(1): 238–254. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.91
    Back to article
  54. 54Keep, TJ. 2023a. Tetradrachm of Philip II. Available at: https://arts.unimelb.pedestal3d.com/r/nBs3HDWN5f [Last accessed 10 July 2025].
    Back to article
  55. 55Keep, TJ. 2023b. Cylinder seal. Available at: https://arts.unimelb.pedestal3d.com/r/UlyjTfcli8 [Last accessed 10 July 2025].
    Back to article
  56. 56Keep, TJ. 2023c. Canopic jar lid with baboon head of the god Hapi. Available at: https://arts.unimelb.pedestal3d.com/r/63jpCn9-13 [Last accessed 10 July 2025].
    Back to article
  57. 57Keep, TJ, Gunn, RG and Goodes, J. 2024. ‘Stretching the Surrogate: An Initial Test Combining DStretch Image Enhancement With Photogrammetry Modelling at Bunjil’s Shelter and Gulgurn Manya, Australia’. Rock Art Research, 41(1): 74–87. DOI: 10.56801/rar.v41i1.273
    Back to article
  58. 58Kolb, DA. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Back to article
  59. 59Koungoulos, L. 2020. ‘Old Dogs, New Tricks: 3D geometric analysis of cranial morphology supports ancient population substructure in the Australian dingo’. Zoomorphology, 139(2): 263–275. DOI: 10.1007/s00435-019-00475-z
    Back to article
  60. 60Krömker, S and Mara, H. 2013. GigaMesh Manual. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University.
    Back to article
  61. 61Kuligowski, K. 2021. Visualising Objects and their Histories: An examination of South Sea Islander objects and the effects of visualisation. Honours thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
    Back to article
  62. 62Liao, H-T, Zhao, M and Sun, S-P. 2020. ‘A Literature Review of Museum and Heritage on Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation’. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 435: 473–476. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200428.101
    Back to article
  63. 63Lopez-Menchero, VM and Grande, A. 2011. ‘The Principles of the Seville Charter’. In: Proceedings of CIPA Symposium 23, Prague (Czech Republic), 12 September – 16 September 2011. CIPA Heritage Documentation, pp. 1–5.
    Back to article
  64. 64Maeir, A. 2019. Brent Davis teaches hieroglyphics using VR! Available at https://gath.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/brent-davis-teaches-hieroglyphics-using-vr/ [Last accessed 26 August 2024].
    Back to article
  65. 65Mara, H and Krömker, S. 2013. ‘Vectorization of 3D-Characters by Integral Invariant Filtering of High-Resolution Triangular Meshes’. In: 2013 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Washington, DC, USA, August 2013. IEEE, pp. 62–66. DOI: 10.1109/ICDAR.2013.21
    Back to article
  66. 66Martinez, KP, Untalan, MZG, Burgos, DFM, Ramos, RV and Germentil, MJQ. 2019. ‘Creation of a Virtual Reality Environment of a University Museum Using 3D Photogrammetric Models’. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2-W13: 841–847. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-841-2019
    Back to article
  67. 67Metcalfe, T. 2017. ‘Ancient ‘Plain of Jars’ Burial Site Recreated in Virtual Reality’. Live Science. Available at https://www.livescience.com/57395-plain-of-jars-burial-site-in-virtual-reality.html [Last accessed 3 September 2024].
    Back to article
  68. 68Moore, J, Rountrey, A and Kettler, HS. (eds.) 2022. 3D Data Creation to Curation: Community Standards for 3D Data Preservation. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
    Back to article
  69. 69Museums & Galleries of New South Wales. 2019. Digitising your Collection. Available at https://mgnsw.org.au/sector/resources/online-resources/ [Last accessed 11 July 2025].
    Back to article
  70. 70NSAMG. 2023. National Standards for Australian Museums and Galleries. 2nd ed. Brisbane: The National Standards Taskforce.
    Back to article
  71. 71Pavelka, K and Raeva, P. 2019. ‘Virtual Museums: The future of historical monuments documentation and visualization’. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, XLII(2): 903–908. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-903-2019
    Back to article
  72. 72Pedestal, 3D. 2025. About Us. Pedestal 3D. Available at https://pedestal3d.com/about/ [Last accessed 2 July 2025].
    Back to article
  73. 73Pix4D. 2017. Pix4Dmapper 4.1 User Manual.
    Back to article
  74. 74Raykovska, M, Bevan, G, Vasilev, I and Tenekedjiev, V. 2016. ‘An Application of Colour Decorrelation Stretching to Faded Frescoes in a Late Medieval Church St. Petka, Western Bulgaria’. Poster presented at 36th Symposium on Byzantine and Post-Byzantine Art and Archaeology, Athens, 20–22 May 2016.
    Back to article
  75. 75Roach, L. 2023. Rock Art Conservation by Digital Record: Monitoring Degradation Over Time in the Blue Mountains. Honours thesis. Sydney: University of Sydney.
    Back to article
  76. 76Robinson, MGP. 2024. Photogrammetry for Archaeological Objects: A Manual. Sydney: Sydney University Press. DOI: 10.2307/jj.18108217
    Back to article
  77. 77Rodríguez González, E, Pastor, SC and Casals, JR. 2019. ‘Lost Colours: Photogrammetry, image analysis using the DStretch plugin, and 3-D modelling of post-firing painted pottery from the south west Iberian Peninsula’. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 13: e00093. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2019.e00093
    Back to article
  78. 78Sharp, A, Thomson, L, Chatterjee, HJ and Hannan, L. 2016. ‘The Value of Object-Based Learning Within and Between Higher Education Disciplines’. In: Chatterjee, HJ and Hannan, L (eds.) Engaging the senses: Object-based learning in higher education. London: Routledge, pp. 97–116. DOI: 10.4324/9781315579641
    Back to article
  79. 79Shoobert, J. 2022. MALoan2021.1.1 Armidale Globe Theatre – Base. Armidale: University of New England.
    Back to article
  80. 80Shoobert, J. 2024. MA1960.37.1 Silver Tetradrachm of Alexander III. Armidale: University of New England.
    Back to article
  81. 81Simpson, A and Hammond, G. 2012. ‘University Collections and Object-Based Pedagogies’. University Museums and Collections Journal, 5: 75–82. DOI: 10.18452/8724
    Back to article
  82. 82Sipiran, I, Mendoza, A, Apaza, A and Lopez, C. 2022. ‘Data-Driven Restoration of Digital Archaeological Pottery with Point Cloud Analysis’. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(9): 2149–2165. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-022-01637-1
    Back to article
  83. 83Stock, P. 2023. ‘Core blimey! A virtual museum for tooling up on stone artefacts’. Cosmos. Available at https://cosmosmagazine.com/history/archaeology/a-virtual-museum-for-tooling-up-on-stone-artefacts/ [Last accessed 11 July 2025].
    Back to article
  84. 84Tanabashi, S. 2021. ‘Old Nishiki-e as Learning Tool for Contemporary Digital Object-based Learning in STEAM Education’. In: 2021 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Tokai, Nagoya, Japan. IEEE. pp. 219–222. DOI: 10.1109/ISET52350.2021.00052
    Back to article
  85. 85Tanabashi, S. 2022. ‘Digital Narratives: Alternative Object-based Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic’. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Hung Hom, Hong Kong. IEEE. pp. 733–735. DOI: 10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00130
    Back to article
  86. 86The London Charter. 2009. The London Charter for the Computer-based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage. Available at https://londoncharter.org/index.html [Last accessed 11 July 2025].
    Back to article
  87. 87The University of Melbourne. 2024. 3D Model Metadata Guide. Available at https://lms.unimelb.edu.au/staff/guides/pedestal-3d/3d-model-metadata-guide [Last accessed 11 July 2025].
    Back to article
  88. 88Thogersen, J, Simpson, A, Hammond, G, Janiszewski, L and Guerry, E. 2018. ‘Creating Curriculum Connections: A University Museum Object-Based Learning Project’. Education for Information, 34(2): 113–120. DOI: 10.3233/EFI-180190
    Back to article
  89. 89Trounson, A. 2017. The new hyper-reality of work. Pursuit. Available at https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/the-new-hyper-reality-of-work [Last accessed 26 August 2024].
    Back to article
  90. 90VFX Grace. 2024. Details Capture v.1.5.2.
    Back to article
  91. 91Way, AM, Koungoulos, L, Wyatt-Spratt, S and Hiscock, P. 2023. ‘Investigating hafting and composite tool repair as factors creating variability in backed artefacts: Evidence from Ngungara (Weereewa/Lake George), south-eastern Australia’. Archaeology in Oceania, 58(2): 214–222. DOI: 10.1002/arco.5292
    Back to article
  92. 92Whitford, MF, Wyatt-Spratt, S, Gore, DB, Johnsson, MT, Power, RK, Rampe, M, Richards, C and Withford, MJ. 2020. ‘Assessing the standardisation of Egyptian shabti manufacture via morphology and elemental analyses’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33: 102541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102541
    Back to article
  93. 93Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IjJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJG, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, ’t Hoen, PAC, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Rocca-Serra, P, Roos, M, van Schaik, R, Sansone, S-A, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, van der Lei, J, van Mulligen, E, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K, Zhao, J and Mons, B. 2016. ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship’. Scientific Data, 3(1): 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  94. 94Witmore, C. 2014. ‘Archaeology and the New Materialisms’. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(2): 203–246. DOI: 10.1558/jca.v1i2.16661
    Back to article
  95. 95Wyatt-Spratt, S. 2018. Fragment – Etruscan Caeretan stamped ware dolio, 3D Model. Available at https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/fragment-etruscan-caeretan-stamped-ware-dolio-160381bfaa0a4a6c8ed794d6eb537044 [Last accesed 11 July 2025].
    Back to article
  96. 96Wyatt-Spratt, S. 2022. ‘After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis’. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 5(1): 215–237. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.103
    Back to article
  97. 97Wyatt-Spratt, S and Thoeming, A. 2019. ‘New Eyes for Old Objects: Teaching history with photogrammetry’. Teaching History, 53(3): 27–33. DOI: 10.1002/9781119412861.ch2
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.222 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2025
Published on: Jul 29, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
3D modelling,
pedagogy,
object-based learning,
archaeology,
metadata,
online education

© 2025 Thomas James Keep, Madeline G. P. Robinson, Jackson Shoobert, Jessie Birkett-Rees, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2025): Issue 1Next article